Good job Arizona

No - I believe without doubt that you are born a homosexual, but others are born murders, and child molesters so?

You have the right to be gay without question, but you do not have the right to force your lifestyle on others who are offended by your actions.
 
Uncle Ben said:
If I was Brewer I would have taken no action and treated myself to a great breakfast come Sunday morning.

She fucked up giving the libs what they wanted all in the name of political correctness. Gawd, is there a conservative politician ANYWHERE that will stand up to these sexual perverts, loonie eco terrorists, and the rest of the wacked out progressives!

There are probably a few unfortunately folks like Cornyn and Cruz aren't there.
Click to expand...

And there is another way to look at this.

Even though I personally disagree with government forcing private businesses to open their doors to people they may not want to, I certainly understand and agree with the governors decision to veto. I believe she was thinking of AZ as a whole, the potential financial repercussions the state would have suffered by politically motivated boycotts could have wreaked havoc on thousands of businesses. Many of them, who may have been against the bill in the first place.

My personal reasons have nothing to do with sexual orientation, race, religion, etc. it's all about stopping government intrusion.
 
angelsbandit said:
de·vi·ant

adjective\-ənt\: different from what is considered to be normal or morally correct
Click to expand...

you posted your definition of homosexual as deviant..in the definition of "homosexual" i do not see the word "deviant"..and in "deviant" there is NO "homosexual" attributes..

who says homosexuality is not "normal" or "moral"..maybe to someone who is not..but to someone who is?..

you are a small minded person.
 
angelsbandit said:
No - I believe without doubt that you are born a homosexual, but others are born murders, and child molesters so?

You have the right to be gay without question, but you do not have the right to force your lifestyle on others who are offended by your actions.
Click to expand...


like the way republicunts force the bible down everybody else's throats? or do you mean by the way the try to indoctrinate you?..which is it?
 
schuylaar said:
[/B]
like the way republicunts force the bible down everybody else's throats? or do you mean by the way the try to indoctrinate you?..which is it?
Click to expand...
Can you give a couple of examples where republican politicians are forcing the bible down everybody's throats.
And just so ya know, forcing biblical beliefs and indoctrinate are the same Schuylarr. :hug:
 
jahbrudda said:
Can you give a couple of examples where republican politicians are forcing the bible down everybody's throats.
And just so ya know, forcing biblical beliefs and indoctrinate are the same Schuylarr. :hug:
Click to expand...

i'm seriously starting to think you have a reading comprehension issue.
 
schuylaar said:
[/B]
like the way republicunts force the bible down everybody else's throats? or do you mean by the way the try to indoctrinate you?..which is it?
Click to expand...

jahbrudda said:
Can you give a couple of examples where republican politicians are forcing the bible down everybody's throats.
And just so ya know, forcing biblical beliefs and indoctrinate are the same Schuylarr. :hug:
Click to expand...

schuylaar said:
i'm seriously starting to think you have a reading comprehension issue.
Click to expand...

Then please tell the big difference, maybe I will learn something.
 
schuylaar said:
you posted your definition of homosexual as deviant..in the definition of "homosexual" i do not see the word "deviant"..and in "deviant" there is NO "homosexual" attributes..

who says homosexuality is not "normal" or "moral"..maybe to someone who is not..but to someone who is?..

you are a small minded person.
Click to expand...

Normal is what 90 percent of people are, and not what 10 percent of others are. Gay people make up about 1 in 10. Therefore, they are deviant by nature, because they deviate from the norm.

Homosexuality is considered amoral because the last 2000 years of western morality has considered it to be such. Morals are decided by society are they not? It is just in the past couple decades that anyone even dared to consider homosexuality acceptable in any western society. By the way, western society is not the only one that has a moral issue with homosexuality.

I will say that I am glad that society seems to be evolving somewhat in being more hospitable to the concept of homosexuality, but it is a mistake to portray it as a normal and equal lifestyle, it is not.
 
woody333333 said:
I doubt it... im sure theyre ok w selling firearms to people of every color religion and sexual preference......you wouldn't tho because youre dumb.....
Click to expand...

racist1.gif
 
schuylaar said:
you posted your definition of homosexual as deviant..in the definition of "homosexual" i do not see the word "deviant"..and in "deviant" there is NO "homosexual" attributes..

who says homosexuality is not "normal" or "moral"..maybe to someone who is not..but to someone who is?..

you are a small minded person.
Click to expand...

See you are too simple minded to understand:

I posted the definition of deviant in reply to another post, and like it or not homosexuality fits the definition of deviant behavior, and this is why many find it offensive.

I personally have nothing against anyone simply based on their sexual preference, color, or religion for that matter.
I do however have a big problem with you, or anyone else telling me that I must accept your actions and beliefs, while you refuse to do the same for those offended by these same actions.


You take away any and all credibility from your cause when you deny others the same rights you have so adamantly demand for yourself.
 
angelsbandit said:
See you are too simple minded to understand:

I posted the definition of deviant in reply to another post, and like it or not homosexuality fits the definition of deviant behavior, and this is why many find it offensive.

I personally have nothing against anyone simply based on their sexual preference, color, or religion for that matter.
I do however have a big problem with you, or anyone else telling me that I must accept your actions and beliefs, while you refuse to do the same for those offended by these same actions.


You take away any and all credibility from your cause when you deny others the same rights you have so adamantly demand for yourself.
Click to expand...

You are wrong, google paraphilia for the definition of what deviant sexual behaviour is.
 
Deviant would involve an instance of one or more parties not consenting. Thus when the state fucks people, it is a case of rape.
 
fr3d12 said:
You are wrong, google paraphilia for the definition of what deviant sexual behaviour is.
Click to expand...

No - I am not wrong.

The definition of deviant I posted is the accepted definition, and it does not make any difference if it is describing sexual preference, opinion, or even a different phenotype in your weed.
 
angelsbandit said:
No - I am not wrong.

The definition of deviant I posted is the accepted definition, and it does not make any difference if it is describing sexual preference, opinion, or even a different phenotype in your weed.
Click to expand...


paraphilia [per′əfil′yə] Etymology: Gk, para + philein, to love

sexual perversion or deviation. A condition in which the sexual instinct is expressed in ways that are socially prohibited or unacceptable or are biologically undesirable, such as the use of a nonhuman object for sexual arousal, sexual activity with another person that involves real or simulated suffering or humiliation, or sexual relations with a nonconsenting partner. Kinds of paraphilia include exhibitionism, pedophilia, transvestism, voyeurism, and zoophilia. paraphiliac, adj., n.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top