Global Warming... Oops, I'm Sorry It's Now Called CLIMATE CHANGE :lol:
- Thread starter CrackerJax
- Start date
CrackerJax
New Member
Does that thing pick up the new HD radio, or do you have to add "special" foil?
Hydrotech364
Well-Known Member
I think she pulled it off pretty well FDD.Kewl Vid.
CrackerJax
New Member
Anjinsan
Well-Known Member
Alright. I've had this discussion a few times elsewhere so I'll summerize my repeated talking points.
1. Global warming is vastly superior to global cooling. Life on Earth EXPLODED during high concentrations of C02. As farmers of sorts...we should all be aware of just how much plants love warmth and C02. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of new species will be created if the Earth warms and gets much higher levels of C02. Especially in the plant world. How come people only discuss polar bears and the other 3 or 4 species in the polar caps. ;P Yeah they might die. Let's be honest...you weren't about to go to the North Pole to see them in the wild anyways. Just imagine a brown bear...but white and you'll be close enough. Meanwhile you can now grow Marijuana trees that are 50' tall and produce 109 lbs of flowers per tree. Fair trade off imo.
2. The weatherman cannot tell for certain what the weather will be in a month...but people are able to predict the weather in 100 years? Maybe one of these mega-science d00ds needs a job as a weatherman as apparently weather is completely unpredictable...unless you are a climate "expert".
3. In the late 70's there was a global cooling scare. Ok today we have computers n models that they did not have then. Fair enough. Computers do not think though. They react to a human's input. If I want to have a climate problem solved...given a choice between a computer and a recent graduate from an appropriate university? I'll take the human. He might not play mp3s for me...but atleast he can think. If I set parameters on a computer...I can make it say or predict whatever i want it to. Like video games. The designers are not actually creating true alternate physical worlds...they are setting parameters for make-believe worlds that behave how they'd like them too. So what were people in the 70's just stupid? Is that it? Retards loose in academia?. I dunno...people in the 60's put a man on the moon...people in the 40's built a nuclear bomb. Computers didn't make us smarter...just a bit faster.
4. Al Gore is a believer. Man if EVER there was a guy who reeks of snake oil salesman...it's Al Gore.
5. We are not able to stop the NUMBER ONE CARBON EMITTER with taxes/carbon credits. The Earth will have none of that silly nonsense and will gladly fart a gazillion tons of C02 into the atmosphere whenever she damn well pleases
1. Global warming is vastly superior to global cooling. Life on Earth EXPLODED during high concentrations of C02. As farmers of sorts...we should all be aware of just how much plants love warmth and C02. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of new species will be created if the Earth warms and gets much higher levels of C02. Especially in the plant world. How come people only discuss polar bears and the other 3 or 4 species in the polar caps. ;P Yeah they might die. Let's be honest...you weren't about to go to the North Pole to see them in the wild anyways. Just imagine a brown bear...but white and you'll be close enough. Meanwhile you can now grow Marijuana trees that are 50' tall and produce 109 lbs of flowers per tree. Fair trade off imo.
2. The weatherman cannot tell for certain what the weather will be in a month...but people are able to predict the weather in 100 years? Maybe one of these mega-science d00ds needs a job as a weatherman as apparently weather is completely unpredictable...unless you are a climate "expert".
3. In the late 70's there was a global cooling scare. Ok today we have computers n models that they did not have then. Fair enough. Computers do not think though. They react to a human's input. If I want to have a climate problem solved...given a choice between a computer and a recent graduate from an appropriate university? I'll take the human. He might not play mp3s for me...but atleast he can think. If I set parameters on a computer...I can make it say or predict whatever i want it to. Like video games. The designers are not actually creating true alternate physical worlds...they are setting parameters for make-believe worlds that behave how they'd like them too. So what were people in the 70's just stupid? Is that it? Retards loose in academia?. I dunno...people in the 60's put a man on the moon...people in the 40's built a nuclear bomb. Computers didn't make us smarter...just a bit faster.
4. Al Gore is a believer. Man if EVER there was a guy who reeks of snake oil salesman...it's Al Gore.
5. We are not able to stop the NUMBER ONE CARBON EMITTER with taxes/carbon credits. The Earth will have none of that silly nonsense and will gladly fart a gazillion tons of C02 into the atmosphere whenever she damn well pleases
CrackerJax
New Member
That is some cold steel logic.
Agreed on all points given. But hey, we get to wear those sexy thongs!!
Anjinsan
Well-Known Member
30 years of global cooling on the way reports the BBC...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/6300329/Sceptics-welcome-BBC-report-on-global-cooling.html
Fucking great. I said it and meant it...global warming is vastly superior to global cooling. But hey the fucking polar bears will get to migrate to downtown Chicago! GREAT!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/6300329/Sceptics-welcome-BBC-report-on-global-cooling.html
Fucking great. I said it and meant it...global warming is vastly superior to global cooling. But hey the fucking polar bears will get to migrate to downtown Chicago! GREAT!
Anjinsan
Well-Known Member
Shiite!and i just sold all my extra jackets.
I live where it's FECKING cold already...I soooooooooooooooo wanted global warming to be real...but just never really believed.
Much like the Easter bunny...it was just too good to be true.
CrackerJax
New Member
It's becoming common knowledge now to the public that global warming.... isn't happening.
Let's see, carry the dollar, multiply the votes, square the taxes, and subtract the paperwork, and divide the polls..... that means the politicians will figure it out in about 8.7 years from now.
Let's see, carry the dollar, multiply the votes, square the taxes, and subtract the paperwork, and divide the polls..... that means the politicians will figure it out in about 8.7 years from now.
CrackerJax
New Member
Of course it was.... I'm not a retard!
CrackerJax
New Member
Let's get this straight. The planet is not warming.
What warming there was stopped over 10 years ago. Moreover, it is now apparent that the proof that the planet was warming comes from largely from temperature readings which meteorologist Anthony Watts warns are unreliable.
He photographed and visually inspected 850 stations in the U.S. and extrapolated their findings globally and learned that fully 89 percent failed to meet the National Weather Service's location requirements.
Many of the locations, wrote Watts, "were located next to the exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, on blistering hot rooftops. And near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat."
But let's not argue. The planet was warming since the end of the little ice age. It stopped in 1998, and over the past decade, it's been getting cooler.
In some places, a lot cooler.
Springtime weather is getting harder to distinguish from winter weather. It snowed in Britain in June. Kids built snowmen. Temperatures here in the northern tier of states have cooled substantially.
As Robert Felix just reported in his authoritative iceagenow.com, on various days is June of 2009 there were record low temperatures in 18 states; record low temperatures in 15 states; record low temperatures in 24 states; record low temperatures in 11 states; record low max temperatures in 20 states; record low temperatures in seven states; and record low temperatures in 10 states.
Despite all this, with a straight face, the Obama administration prattles on about a disastrous global warming that just plain isn't happening.
[youtube]qJUFTm6cJXM[/youtube]
What warming there was stopped over 10 years ago. Moreover, it is now apparent that the proof that the planet was warming comes from largely from temperature readings which meteorologist Anthony Watts warns are unreliable.
He photographed and visually inspected 850 stations in the U.S. and extrapolated their findings globally and learned that fully 89 percent failed to meet the National Weather Service's location requirements.
Many of the locations, wrote Watts, "were located next to the exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, on blistering hot rooftops. And near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat."
But let's not argue. The planet was warming since the end of the little ice age. It stopped in 1998, and over the past decade, it's been getting cooler.
In some places, a lot cooler.
Springtime weather is getting harder to distinguish from winter weather. It snowed in Britain in June. Kids built snowmen. Temperatures here in the northern tier of states have cooled substantially.
As Robert Felix just reported in his authoritative iceagenow.com, on various days is June of 2009 there were record low temperatures in 18 states; record low temperatures in 15 states; record low temperatures in 24 states; record low temperatures in 11 states; record low max temperatures in 20 states; record low temperatures in seven states; and record low temperatures in 10 states.
Despite all this, with a straight face, the Obama administration prattles on about a disastrous global warming that just plain isn't happening.
[youtube]qJUFTm6cJXM[/youtube]
this just in, ...
AP IMPACT: Statisticians reject global cooling
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sci_global_cooling
AP IMPACT: Statisticians reject global cooling
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sci_global_cooling
CrackerJax
New Member
Oh, yahoo...
I'll go with actual temps..thanks. like the article says.... all of the original data is flawed flawed flawed.
I'll go with actual temps..thanks. like the article says.... all of the original data is flawed flawed flawed.