CannaPanda
Well-Known Member
Now Now Kids, You're ALL right...
Girls are you here to learn about weed?
- Thread starter misshestermoffitt
- Start date
- Status
Jointsmith
Well-Known Member
I for one wouldn't give a fuck, I see a GIANT ROCK HARD COCK everyday anyway.
Offensiveness is all relative anyway.
In Muslim cultures Natrones Avi would be offensive.
Jointsmith
Well-Known Member
Just to clarify, the GIANT ROCK HARD COCK is my own.
Jointsmith
Well-Known Member
In fact, MHM, your avi appears to be Jesus riding a Dragon, don't you think some people might find that a wee bit offensive?
offensive, pornographic, vulgar, nude, .......... pics are not allowed. if you read the rules "links" are not even allowed. you all keep trying to voice your opinions. they don't matter, sorry. the rules have been written. i will now STRICTLY enforce them since i see a very high lack of respect for the ladies here. what happened to being "gentlemen"? i see a lot of "ladies".
i have given no infractions on this thread. there are mods that lurk. just so you all know.
i have given no infractions on this thread. there are mods that lurk. just so you all know.
misshestermoffitt
New Member
Thank you FDD for always being respectful toward women.
Some of us do appreciate it.
and it's a T-rex, it's a response to the creationist museum in Kentucky that depicts people riding dinosaurs. Talk about misinformation.
Some of us do appreciate it.
PS Jesus is wearing clothes, and it's a cartoon. Now if it was actually Jesus and he was naked then yes, it would be offensive.
and it's a T-rex, it's a response to the creationist museum in Kentucky that depicts people riding dinosaurs. Talk about misinformation.
ZenMaster
Well-Known Member
The freedoms on this site are slowly diminishing..
Honestly, when I first started here people could say what they want, post what they want, and have any kind of avatar they wanted. I remember there was a thread about this not to long ago.. Then this site got really popular and so did the cry of political correctness. I could have sworn we were all adults here, I must have been wrong.
Some people have to have it their way. Some things on this forum I'd like to see different but I'm not going to bitch up a storm until its changed, hell I'm a guest here and I am just glad to be apart of the show, I'm not selfish enough to demand it change to accommodate my standards or beliefs.
Don't let such things bother you so much, you'll be much happier.
Honestly, when I first started here people could say what they want, post what they want, and have any kind of avatar they wanted. I remember there was a thread about this not to long ago.. Then this site got really popular and so did the cry of political correctness. I could have sworn we were all adults here, I must have been wrong.
Some people have to have it their way. Some things on this forum I'd like to see different but I'm not going to bitch up a storm until its changed, hell I'm a guest here and I am just glad to be apart of the show, I'm not selfish enough to demand it change to accommodate my standards or beliefs.
Don't let such things bother you so much, you'll be much happier.
natrone23
Well-Known Member
no that would be against the rules. but if the pot leaf covered the whole genitals it would not be against the rules........your comparison might be correct if the pot leaf only covered that "bimbo's'' clitoris...........................like i said your not offended when woman places a small piece of fabric over their genitala......but when in its a pot leaf the same size as that small piece of fabric....you call it pornography and the young woman names such as "bimbo"
CannaPanda
Well-Known Member
LOL @ 'freedom diminishing' statement... im a Newbie here... but its true... if u wanna have a good avatar, it should be something forum related.. no?
people were all respectful of each other as well. ah, the "good ole days". the worst avatar on here was Tahoe's and those were actually rather cool.
if i find it "offensive", whether or not it's nudity, IT'S GONE!!
call me a nazi.
misshestermoffitt
New Member
It only covers the actual vagina, the mons is still visable. If she were to walk onto a publc beach wearing that she would be arrested for indecent exposure. You could not walk down the street dressed like that.
In order for it to compare to a bikini, you would have to cover the whole mons, and the ass too. Right now it's like she's just trying to cover her tampon string. Maybe she was embarressed about her episotomy scar on her taint.
In order for it to compare to a bikini, you would have to cover the whole mons, and the ass too. Right now it's like she's just trying to cover her tampon string. Maybe she was embarressed about her episotomy scar on her taint.
Jointsmith
Well-Known Member
Actually to a hard line Christian it would already be offensive.
So it's ok to offend Christians but not Feminists?
"SICC"
Well-Known Member
thank you
misshestermoffitt
New Member
as long as jesus is fully robed, which he is.
I don't see how you can compare naked women to a fairy tale like the bible.
I don't see how you can compare naked women to a fairy tale like the bible.
thunderballs
New Member
yabba dabba dooo
Sunnysideup
Well-Known Member
...yes....
ZenMaster
Well-Known Member
Exactly, I am not exactly pleased with all the blasphemous pictures with Christ on it everywhere, but whatever, this is a free country you should be allowed to have what you want. Not gonna start a thread over it. But if you see a pair of titties then its on. You know in Europe they don't think boobs are a big deal, so much like a dude without a shirt. They laugh at us Americans over our censoring of it, haha.
thunderballs
New Member
cushion for the pushing feminist make this country horrible by the way
- Status