Now that we have read this latest one by you, lets look at some of your other posts, that are just flowing with fact and lacking assumptions of any kind:
Hmm jealous much?
I'm not jealous of... whatever people like you in your culture get jealous of.
More insults, im convinced you are BrotherBuz in disguise....
That's Bullshit. Are you delusional much? More insults? That was the first one clown
Actually fool, even after 9-11. almost all of use were STILL against invading Iraq. There was an ample amount of doubt to the info they had about WMD, and instead of waiting a few extra weeks, Bush and Congress made that decision, NOT US.
You voted for that President. He's your Father
Fool.
Right out of the very link you provided:
There’s a clear-cut engineering explanation for why the building fell the way it did. Trusses on the fifth and seventh floors of the building were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another; with the south face heavily damaged, the other columns were likely overtaxed. In engineering terms, the “progressive collapse” began on the eastern side, when weakened columns failed from the damage and fire. The entire building fell in on itself as the slumping east side dragged down the west side in a diagonal pattern. Still, damage to the Verizon Building (see p. 21 of
this report), directly west of WTC7, and to Fiterman Hall (see
here) directly north, show that it was hardly an orderly collapse.
Thats from YOUR link.
Wrong.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,265160,00.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html
There are more, but it was already detirmined that it was mistaken identities and identity theft.
This has already been explained MANY times, as it was the first thing you theorists brought to the table. Im not even going to bother. Try again.