We are forced to pay for the roads you use and the school you either went to or chose not to.
It's part of the social contract. Eventually we will be forced to pay for the welfare you collect becuase you are obviously unemployable
The social contract is a fallacy and an exercise in word smithing. First of all, a "contract" that alleges to benefit society, would not have a basis in coercive government. You can't get there from here, that's like ensuring the fire is put out by adding gasoline.
Also any "contract" worth anything is based in a mutual agreement that is accepted, acknowledged and agreed to by all the participants. You would be more accurate calling it the "social edict" , since it does not contain the essential elements of a contract.
Yes you might be forced to pay for things. That's my point. Roads and schools can be administered privately on a pay as you use basis, like other products and services, like oh I don't know bread, cars, computers and blowup dolls. That way those who use them pay and those that don't aren't forced to pay for things they don't use.
You champion a system that mixes "goods and services" , with "bads and disservices" and think that's the best there is. You should stick to chewing your cud and baaaing. You are proof that the Prussian School system has taught you obedience, but given you little ability to apply logic and reasoning.
Why do you insist on calling something a "contract" if some of the parties involved did not agree to it? I understand your misunderstanding though. You also think your wanting to make pot "illegal" to sell, doesn't make you a prohibitionist. Sad.
and I want it to be as free as the lawn I mow and the air I breath!
