Fines for not having Obama care are going up over 200%

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
LOL!!!

And Obamacare was not going to cost the taxpayers a dime because they were going to save so much money. Until it was 200 billion then 800 billion now much more than a trillion in spending. Cause you know... WE WERE ALREADY PAYING FOR IT!!!

Does anyone see the complete insanity with the above argument?

If we were already paying for it.... Why did fixing it and supposedly saving us money cost trillions more in tax dollars??
wow, you are a retarded person.

if, as you state, "obamacare was not going to cost the taxpayers a dime", then why did they project the costs of obamacare to be a certain amount?

and why, if as you state, it was "200 billion then 800 billion now much more than a trillion", why is obamacare costing 20% less than projected?

at least your inane bunch of lies got a like from resident retard and fellow racist ginwilly.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
Yup. They got someone by the balls but fail to see that guy is a surgeon and can quickly removed the body part.

I doubt the doctors will refuse emergency treatment, but follow-ups and post ops, and scripts to pharmacies,...all can be turned away.
Absolutely, completely normal to turn away someone who is requesting or needs medication.

Except what happens?

They end up coming back later in worse condition since they didn't get their meds, then taxpayers pay for the patients treatments anyways since they go on through the ER and then are admitted.

Scenario: a patient claiming to be a diabetic presents and claims he needs insulin or he will be out in two-three days. He is turned away.

The patient presents five days later, he is in hyperglycemic shock. The cost of the ambulance, the ER admission, the nursing tower admission, every day he spends there. Every sponge and dressing, if the patient cannot pay the taxpayer or hospital pay.

Why not give him enough medicine to Avoid that issue if he is unable to afford the medication? It seems quite silly to NOT give this patient medication, but hospitals do it frequently.

Ultimately universal healthcare saves money for a nation like the US that requires Emergency Departments to treat patients 100%.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Absolutely, completely normal to turn away someone who is requesting or needs medication.

Except what happens?

They end up coming back later in worse condition since they didn't get their meds, then taxpayers pay for the patients treatments anyways since they go on through the ER and then are admitted.

Scenario: a patient claiming to be a diabetic presents and claims he needs insulin or he will be out in two-three days. He is turned away.

The patient presents five days later, he is in hyperglycemic shock. The cost of the ambulance, the ER admission, the nursing tower admission, every day he spends there. Every sponge and dressing, if the patient cannot pay the taxpayer or hospital pay.

Why not give him enough medicine to Avoid that issue if he is unable to afford the medication? It seems quite silly to NOT give this patient medication, but hospitals do it frequently.

Ultimately universal healthcare saves money for a nation like the US that requires Emergency Departments to treat patients 100%.

I honestly believe that Obama knew this as well. That`s why his first attempt at healthcare not only worked, but was in the best interest of our country. Would have made him a hero of sorts and it was deserved. Then he sold out the population`s chances at finally conquering the health care issue to lobbyists that insisted that big insurance companies will no doubt fold and he must make changes to include the big insurances too.

He sold us out to lobbyists with an agenda and I`ll never forgive him for that.

He had it right the first time.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
I honestly believe that Obama knew this as well. That`s why his first attempt at healthcare not only worked, but was in the best interest of our country. Would have made him a hero of sorts and it was deserved. Then he sold out the population`s chances at finally conquering the health care issue to lobbyists that insisted that big insurance companies will no doubt fold and he must make changes to include the big insurances too.

He sold us out to lobbyists with an agenda and I`ll never forgive him for that.

He had it right the first time.
Check his party, it's the same as the Pubs. He presented himself as a liberal, he is nothing but a corporatist with a different letter.

-GITMO
-Renewed patriot act
-Renewed NSA permissions
-UAV assassinations of US citizens without trial
-Appoints friends and colleagues to posts
-Appoints ex lobbyists to positions where there is an obvious and direct conflict of interest

Goes on and on and on.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
If I walk into Boston and go to the emergency room, they will treat me. 100% guaranteed, no matter what insurance I do or do not have.

Most healthcare jobs require you treat injured people, doctors take an oath. Nurses first job is to be patient advocates, I would lose my job f I refused to render aid, EVER. When I had my EMT-Paramedic through NREMT I was legally required to render aid to anyone I saw or I could lose my EMT-P.

See where I am going with this?

May as well put the money into the pot in a visible way instead of stiffing hospitals until they close.
You will get triaged, the treatment will only come if needed (or fear of lawsuit). You know this though.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
doctors take no oath-

joke.

an eastern doctor taking a western philosopher's oath? preposterous.

they get paid. only. doctors refuse all the time. if folks knew the bullshit that happened behind all the dull looks at the hospital they'd never go there. better odds at the casino.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
doctors take no oath-

joke.

an eastern doctor taking a western philosopher's oath? preposterous.

they get paid. only. doctors refuse all the time. if folks knew the bullshit that happened behind all the dull looks at the hospital they'd never go there. better odds at the casino.
Please, let's see you CV for hospital work.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
doctors take no oath-

joke.

an eastern doctor taking a western philosopher's oath? preposterous.

they get paid. only. doctors refuse all the time. if folks knew the bullshit that happened behind all the dull looks at the hospital they'd never go there. better odds at the casino.
I wish we would incorporate more eastern medicine in our western world. I took a acupressure class from a Korean doc for ceus that was eyeopening. It's a very holistic approach instead of our pill pushing ways. He was talking about one of his classes final was 32 different feces samples and they had to diagnose the disease in each. His words will never leave me, "the poo poo tells you everything". We don't think like that.

Preventative medicine the basis for 90% of the practice in Asia, here it's about 10%.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I wish we would incorporate more eastern medicine in our western world. I took a acupressure class from a Korean doc for ceus that was eyeopening. It's a very holistic approach instead of our pill pushing ways. He was talking about one of his classes final was 32 different feces samples and they had to diagnose the disease in each. His words will never leave me, "the poo poo tells you everything". We don't think like that.

Preventative medicine the basis for 90% of the practice in Asia, here it's about 10%.
speak for yourself, i examine every shit i take very closely.
 
Top