abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
lolthere is not amount of fighting or guerilla terrorist actions that would end well.
I think it makes for a compelling image, it actually looks rather nice.
lolthere is not amount of fighting or guerilla terrorist actions that would end well.
lol
I think it makes for a compelling image, it actually looks rather nice.
The basement where the Romanovs were riddled with bullets, ended well.I'm am art stupid, what am I looking at.
one sec lemme google .....romanovsThe basement where the Romanovs were riddled with bullets, ended well.
That's like, your opinion, man.ok gotcha, but see in that time; that could happen.
theres is no way anything like that could happen today. even if you did "cut the dead of the snake" so-to-speak
the government would not change.
yes but at no time in history, has this option not a viable option.
there is not amount of fighting or guerilla terrorist actions that would end well.
it would have the opposite effect.
it has to be a complete social/ideological rebellion, like the 100% rejection of the dollar or some other idea.
Having difficulty following your logic.ok gotcha, but see in that time; that could happen.
theres is no way anything like that could happen today. even if you did "cut the dead of the snake" so-to-speak
the government would not change.
Having difficulty following your logic.
We get it, you're counter revolutionary and yet still think you're a dissident, cognitive dissonance. You have already here demonstrated a lack of historical understanding sufficient to make any sort of argument regarding revolutionary praxis or theory from you immediately suspect.talking about revolution on the current oligarchy, buy means of conflict. right
IMHO: that is not an option, no matter how it is executed.
there is no winning solution to a hostile citizen coup.
He's not the only black guy who couldn't win a court case. You might be surprised to learn what the world is like when you're not white...LMAO abu coudnt even win his court case.
You probably still call indigenous people of the North America, "Indians".....newsalert, Columbus thought he was lost in.....India.....deluded fucks indeedThey're all a bunch of deluded fucks...
Evidence of this is easily available given both camps believe Trump is good for America.
We call them Native Americans here.You probably still call indigenous people of the North America, "Indians".....newsalert, Columbus thought he was lost in.....India.....deluded fucks indeed
I don't know of any examples in history where powerful elite surrendered without a fight.talking about revolution on the current oligarchy, buy means of conflict. right
IMHO: that is not an option, no matter how it is executed.
there is no winning solution to a hostile citizen coup.
Completely off topic, that post of yours was.You probably still call indigenous people of the North America, "Indians".....newsalert, Columbus thought he was lost in.....India.....deluded fucks indeed
Violence worked because the colonizers routinely used violence to control the native population.Vietnam did a pretty good job in getting rid of the French and American colonizers.
I am a child of the 60's,(a hippie, and proud of it ), and let me tell you something that without the Black Panthers, the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society), the Nation of Islam and the Weathermen, shit all would have happened at that time as far as getting out of Vietnam or the equal treatment of black citizens in the US, as soon as possible.Violence worked because the colonizers routinely used violence to control the native population.
It still took decades and hundreds of thousands of casualties. Is that something we want for our country and children?
I think not, so we need to fully utilize nonviolent methods and approaches first. Violence is the last resort, not the first option.
You just basically laid out Antifa's approach. This is one of those moments. It's just like how you gripe for hours about Clinton when she has the same fucking policy as Bernard. All this bullshit you spew and then you do a 180 and spell out exactly what you didn't even know you were criticizing.Violence worked because the colonizers routinely used violence to control the native population.
It still took decades and hundreds of thousands of casualties. Is that something we want for our country and children?
I think not, so we need to fully utilize nonviolent methods and approaches first. Violence is the last resort, not the first option.
So, your saying that there is no oppression "here"?Violence became necessary only when the opposition used violence in the service of oppression.
That is not the case here.