FBI, DHS Classify antifa as acts as Domestic Terrorism.

Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Antifa will make themselves heard more clearly through numbers and nonviolent protest than by stooping to the level of the thugs they're protesting.

I understand your anger and I share it. Just like in martial arts class, there's a right way and a wrong way to channel it.
Click to expand...
What I learned from Shaolin Kung Fu, is that there are two systems, the "hard" one, where you match the adversary's blow by blow in order to win, and a "soft" style, where you let the enemy defeat himself by avoiding his blows, and then strike to win.
Avoiding the blows of the Nazis and white supremacists, so far has not worked to eliminate their threat.
I think now it is time to try a hard style, as it seems they have been getting off too easy, like for the last 100 years.
Fuck 'em, it's time for a change in tactics, and make them crawl back under the rocks where they came from.
I really wish I didn't feel this way, but I unfortunately I do.
What was that saying?
Nice guy's finish last?
Fuck that shit, I want to win.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
What I learned from Shaolin Kung Fu, is that there are two systems, the "hard" one, where you match the adversary's blow by blow in order to win, and a "soft" style, where you let the enemy defeat himself by avoiding his blows, and then strike to win.
Avoiding the blows of the Nazis and white supremacists, so far has not worked to eliminate their threat.
I think now it is time to try a hard style, as it seems they have been getting off too easy, like for the last 100 years.
Fuck 'em, it's time for a change in tactics, and make them crawl back under the rocks where they came from.
I really wish I didn't feel this way, but I unfortunately I do.
What was that saying?
Nice guy's finish last?
Fuck that shit, I want to win.
Click to expand...
If it devolves into violence, the thugs- and their sympathisers in the police forces- win.

They'll use the violence to justify ever more heavy handed tactics.

Maybe it's time you studied some history.
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
SouthCross said:
I have no idea why. What I do know is the Federal government doesn't tolerate competition. If they can't control you. They're gonna bring down the patriot act.

I didn't post this article to start a fight or try to change established mindsets. You're going to do what you want no matter what. Take the article as a warning. The Federal government does not play.
Click to expand...
Who is in charge? Does this surprise you.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
That is not the case here? Bullshit, I nailed it. That's exactly what you're pushing. You're saying Antifa started it against the white nationalists.
Click to expand...
Quote where I said it, liar. You know damn well I said no such thing. You're just making shit up now.

Fight your own fight, but the side that starts the bloodshed loses.

But I guess you think you're smarter than MLK, Jr and Mahatma Gandhi.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Actually it is the case here. Antifa protects protesters and obstructs far-right demonstrations (also a defensive measure). There is no other way to interpret what you said than "antifa started it".

Then you just insist that's not what you're saying without correcting it so it can be interpreted according to what ever you say you meant.

You're an idiot. :lol:
Click to expand...
You're an example of pretzel logic and a bad liar.

I said that non violence is the best course.

Maybe you need a remedial reading course.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
You're an example of pretzel logic and a bad liar.

I said that non violence is the best course.

Maybe you need a remedial reading course.
Click to expand...
You have literally not once used those words in this thread but thanks for clearing up what you meant. I don't see how anyone could ever get that from your convoluted and nonsensical argument but that is still all you had to do, just clear up what you meant.

So how many hugs did it take to topple the nazi regime?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
You have literally not once used those words in this thread but thanks for clearing up what you meant. I don't see how anyone could ever get that from your convoluted and nonsensical argument but that is still all you had to do, just clear up what you meant.

So how many hugs did it take to topple the nazi regime?
Click to expand...
Ask Gandhi how many bullets it took to beat the British.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Ask Gandhi how many bullets it took to beat the British.
Click to expand...
I would rather ask Ghandi why he was such a racist pedophile who beat his wife.

Also, it took a lot of violence to beat the British, that and workers strikes during a time when the empire was stretched thin.

Nonviolence is objectively pro-fascist.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
I would rather ask Ghandi why he was such a racist pedophile who beat his wife.

Also, it took a lot of violence to beat the British, that and workers strikes during a time when the empire was stretched thin.

Nonviolence is objectively pro-fascist.
Click to expand...
Right, because no one lives up to your vaunted standards. Give us a break.

The violence didn't work, but the strikes and marches did.

'non violence is pro fascist' That's the most retarded thing I think I've heard yet. That's even more retarded then Uncle Buck's drivel. Congratulations on hitting a new low!
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Also, there was a whole lot of violence in India during the struggle for independance. Just because the regime that rose decided to put Ghandi's face on it doesn't mean that the people who actually FOUGHT for it AGAINST VIOLENT GENOCIDAL OPPRESSORS never existed.

Fuck Ghandi.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Also, there was a whole lot of violence in India during the struggle for independance. Just because the regime that rose decided to put Ghandi's face on it doesn't mean that the people who actually FOUGHT for it AGAINST VIOLENT GENOCIDAL OPPRESSORS never existed.

Fuck Ghandi.
Click to expand...
If you think violence is the answer, then start making bombs.

I don't think it is.

One can fight without being violent.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
If you think violence is the answer, then start making bombs.
Click to expand...
Is that the best you've got? I mean it is slightly better than your other fail ass posts. It does convey accurately the loaded fallacy in your mind in such a way that many goons would accept as an actual argument. So in that regard it's ok. I give it a 4/10, better luck next time.

Why you think you know shit about violence is escaping me at the moment, I mean you're clearly a coward who has never had the courage to stand up for someone who couldn't stand up for themselves or who was being oppressed systematically because of their demographics. I bet you would have told Jews in Germany in the 30s not to resist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top