exceeds quantum limit of Earth-based storage

Yes, it does take a while to get to the PC level. And a lot of Java stuff just skipped PC for smart phones. It is not about milking the consumer any more than usual. It's all about the minds of developers. Yep, the most odd folks on earth. If you think Doctors never learned bedside manners, our geeks of the world can't even speak in plain English. That's my job. I'm a translator. When the Indian guy can't understand the Chinese guy, I can understand them both.

IAC, in this world, first you get the geeks, then you get the money. So, think ecosystem with hairy, belchy, Cheetos eaters that need the care and feeding. It is not the customers. We get geeks that are special in their own mind, because they can swim in the ecosystem. Tech is littered with empty fish tanks that no true geek will be in. It is the war of the fish tanks. Google, Apple, Microsoft. IBM, Oracle, Hewitt Packard. It always boils down to just 3 ecosystems per market. I've had to jump tanks twice now. ComputerVision and then Sun Microsystems. Dry tanks.

IAC, on biio-switching in general. That is now being superceeded by the qubit. Why worry about fast switching when instant results are being hypothesized? However there is an experiment proposed for detecting Dark Matter with DNA. You will have to read about it. It seems weird, but possible.


http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/346113/description/Hunting_dark_matter_with_DNA

OGEvilgenius said:

You would think Quantum might have even more potential than just 4 characters though. 1's and 0's definitely limit us.

I just know I read some theoretical stuff years ago about DNA based computing but I haven't seen much lately and I figure I might get more out of someone who obviously works closely in the field.

Click to expand...

Quantum computing will not be held back by binary. They are already developing systems that do not rely on the yes/no (binary) for more advanced storage/faster computing. Makes me kind of pissed I wasted all that time learning hex... anywho..

I see that you've dabbled in chaos theory. You probably want to at least dabble in ODE (ordinary differential equations) and PDE (partial differential eqs) as well as some real analysis before you look into chaos theory. Otherwise it probably won't make any sense to you.

I'm not sure where I read that by 2016 computers will not need to rely on base 2 processing (I think it was future pc mag or something), but they said that it will be base 16 by 2016. So as opposed to 2^64, you're gonna get 16^64. Obviously if they can increase the base, there's no limit to what it can do. Pretty soon you'll systems storing 100^100 or something like that.

As far as where we're going to store this. I dunno. Michichio Kaku is convinced we're going to have a colony on the moon that will act as an airport for outer space travel and storage of massive things. As to how all this shit works out, I dunno. I just studied math in school. So if you give me a theorem I can find out if it works... other than that, not my job.

And yet we cannot read the moon landing tapes. 4 bit only. The last machine is in a museum. Yet, Hex is good to know. But, I'm not sure the base system means as much as the logic. We are really having a hard time with quantum logic. How to compile human readable code into 3 qubit logic? Work is being accomplished. A Nobel prize awaits.