End of the world

I disagree. The USA doesn't have enough nukes to properly resurface a country the size of Italy once, let alone the world a hundred. I would ask you for links to your, uhm, information. cn

I dont get my information off the internet, i read it out of a book or learn it in class where you can find real information that is actually credible. OH, and FYI. As of 2012, the united states has around 5,000 warheads.
 
I dont get my information off the internet, i read it out of a book or learn it in class where you can find real information that is actually credible. OH, and FYI. As of 2012, the united states has around 5,000 warheads.

Nice go at argumentum ad hominem. That said, please provide a bibliographic reference, then. I'll do it the old-school way as well.
However, if I combine your info with your claim, you're saying that fifty average warheads will ruin the Earth. Remember our and their atmospheric testing program? it didn't even make a palpable change in our weather or ecosphere. I disbelieve your claim, and challenge you to back it up with something a bit meatier than "I read it somewhere". cn
 
Nice go at argumentum ad hominem. That said, please provide a bibliographic reference, then. I'll do it the old-school way as well.
However, if I combine your info with your claim, you're saying that fifty average warheads will ruin the Earth. Remember our and their atmospheric testing program? it didn't even make a palpable change in our weather or ecosphere. I disbelieve your claim, and challenge you to back it up with something a bit meatier than "I read it somewhere". cn

I weep for the future.
 
I seen a documentary where that would only happen if everyone sent their missles at once, the US could do alot of damage but definitely not the whole world, I think Russia actually has more than us too.

My information, Countdown to Zero, it would take 30 minutes or less to kill off 90% of the world's population.
 
Back
Top