Surprisingly you make a completely valid point about human life not being as special as we make it out to be. But at the same time I can't picture someone being blown up by a missile would do any good for the world. It is like playing simcity and calling for natural disasters because we get bored lol.
Yea. I guess my ultimate point is, people are going to get killed, but we all have to live here. So, it's best to be as good as we can toward one another, because the world would suck even more if we weren't. Also, if you truly do place a premium on human life, then you would logically have to accept collateral damage, because in the real world it is a numbers game. The real problem, is are the targets valid, and what are the safeguards in place insuring we don't make a mistake.
Im sure all those parents think it's totally cool that their children got blown up to try stop "the bad man"...
There's a hell of alot better and cheaper consumer drones out there.
That drone does not exist yet. So there's NOT a hellova lot better and cheaper already, now is there?
That tiny UAV is pretty amazing, the tracking method, a transponder I wonder?
Lots of prototypes for that, some can even move around by themselves and avoid obstacles in a dynamic environment.
/politics tradition?
Dude, Google is your friend.
As a youngster when I first read Neuromancer I was scared of that doomsday scenario, sentient AI. True AI. Fucking startling.
True AI isn't really the issue, it would simply solve problems provided to it using the information it's has "learned".
