Don't Fuck with the Jesus...

UncleBuck said:

goddamn, you are hopelessly stupid.

Click to expand...

You are still a butthurt pedophile, nothing has changed

skunkd0c said:

i do not understand why folk use the "nature" argument to either support or condemn homosexuality

weather something exists in nature or not is not a contributing factor as to weather this state is a desirable outcome/trait or not

incest and cannibalism are both natural since both traits exist in nature

for gays, > consenting adults not causing harm to others is all that is/should be needed to afford gays equal rights to heterosexuals
but at the same time if a gay guy feels the need/want to refer to me as a breeder or any other word that stereotypes all heterosexual folk
i can equally refer to them with whatever words i choose to stereotype them

peace

Click to expand...

*whether

any more totally cool true stories lately?

skunkd0c said:

i once jokingly said to a less refined type of lady "i would like to make love to you"
she laughed and said "fuck off you faggot"

i said "i want to fuck you, you dirty slut"
she said, ok

horses for courses i guess

Click to expand...

Life without women would be a pain in the ass, literally.

tyler.durden said:

I'm starting to really dig the recent use of the term dumb dumb. It somehow packs more force than 'stupid motherfucker!',,,

Click to expand...

abe inspired me.

I also think the word "poo" is funnier than the word "shit"
or "poop."

e.g.

I eat lightning and crap poo.

UncleBuck said:

*whether

any more totally cool true stories lately?

Click to expand...

ill tell you as many true stories as you like, if you can explain your comments below
about child rape

UncleBuck said:

when did you stop raping 12 year old kids and start raping 14 year old kids?

Click to expand...

skunkd0c said:

ill tell you as many true stories as you like, if you can explain your comments below
about child rape

Click to expand...

want to include some context around that?

perhaps how i was responding to one of your fellow klansmen who stated that a question cannot be a logical fallacy, hence why i made a question with a presupposition (a logical fallacy called a loaded question)?

nah, you don't want to do that.

i'll let you tell some more totally cool and true stories.

UncleBuck said:

want to include some context around that?

Click to expand...

indeed i will, and i shall respond with another true story as promised

One sunny day a pedophile (unclebuck) fantasized about child rape

UncleBuck said:

when did you stop raping 12 year old kids and start raping 14 year old kids?

Click to expand...

The end

Yessica... said:

CAMMAN.

This isn't politics.

You can all do whatever you want, and feel however you want.

But arguing over this, like everything else in the politics section, is just people from different places with different views on the world - kicking and screaming to say how right they are.

Anywho. Anyone like titties?

I like Titties.

That should go on my gravestone:

"Here lies Yessica...

Loved tits, HATED Trousers. "

Click to expand...

Does anyone else want to start a thread about me?

skunkd0c said:

i do not understand why folk use the "nature" argument to either support or condemn homosexuality

weather something exists in nature or not is not a contributing factor as to weather this state is a desirable outcome/trait or not

incest and cannibalism are both natural since both traits exist in nature

for gays, > consenting adults not causing harm to others is all that is/should be needed to afford gays equal rights to heterosexuals
but at the same time if a gay guy feels the need/want to refer to me as a breeder or any other word that stereotypes all heterosexual folk
i can equally refer to them with whatever words i choose to stereotype them

peace

Click to expand...

I believe the natural aspect of homosexuality was brought up as a correction that being gay is a choice. Animals cannot make such advanced cognitive choices, yet many are homosexual. This shows homosexuality is not chosen...

Wait what???????

tyler.durden said:

I believe the natural aspect of homosexuality was brought up as a correction that being gay is a choice. Animals cannot make such advanced cognitive choices, yet many are homosexual. This shows homosexuality is not chosen...

Click to expand...

Many bible people believe that the Sky Jew snapped his fingers and created man, saying that man did not evolve from apes.


Other than that the gay haters like Derp Vapour only have stuff like this:

Being gay would be a choice for me.
But my boyfriend is a real homo.

charface said:

Being gay would be a choice for me.
But my boyfriend is a real homo.

Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahgaha


You're great. PM me! It's been awhile.

Well put David, well put...

Religion is a choice and i don't hold it against them..oh wait..ya i do..

Romans 1:26-28 “For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper.”

First Corinthians 1:6-10 “Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”

First Timothy 1:9-11 “Understanding this that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.”



Those who are living in sexual immorality such as homosexuality (1 Cor 6:10; Rom 1:26-28; Col 3:5-7; Gal 5:21) will not be going to the Kingdom of Heaven (1 Cor 5:9-10). If you have this urge to live this lifestyle, you are no different than any other sinner who needed to repent and confess their sins and then put their trust in Christ as Lord and Savior. Even Christians sin but the difference is we repent of them and confess them when we do sin for we all stumble (Rom 7) but the main difference is that we don’t continue in sin. John warns that “Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil” (1 John 3:. Christians are not sinless but we will sin less as we grow in Christ. Believers stumble into sin but unbelievers dive into it and swim in it. Christians fall into sin but get back up but the unsaved wallow in it. That is the difference. Yes, Christian’s sin but they hate it when they do…unbeliever’s sin and see no problem with it and love the pleasures of sin. If you have been or were a practicing homosexual and have repented and confessed this sin and trusted in Christ, there is no reason that you won’t be in the Kingdom of Heaven. That’s what grace is all about…unmerited, unearned, and undeserved favor from God…of which I don’t deserve nor does anyone else for that matter (Rom 3:23; 6:23).

^^ Ghostdriver, is that you?

Flaming Pie said:

That would injure someone.... Definitely not for use in or around the rectum.

Click to expand...

Rectum? Damn near killed him.