Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Sounds delicious. You should try ingesting more words in people's posts.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter MrStickyScissors
- Start date
- Status
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Yup. Bush signed that into law but I believe Hillary will make use of certain portions. She voted for it after all.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
For those that like politifact.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Straight from the lady''s mouth.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Trump wants to put it on steroids you moron.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Like you? You are on Medicaid and food stamps, passing the buck on to people like chesus and me.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Maybe he was speaking in generalities and he doesn't mean all or most blacks. Or maybe he believes that they vote Democrat because the Democrats tend to advocate for expanding social programs or offering special handouts for a large portion of black people since many of them ARE in poverty.
He feels that democrats are the party of hand outs so then the black people who vote Democrats are doing that because they feel they more to gain there.
Maybe his opinion was formed without much data and it can be changed?
Pushing people away is not the answer.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
So poor people aren't entitled to help? Because I certainly have never said that. The few votes I have cast were not towards those that would leave people hungry and sick.
Just because you are too stupid to comprehend Ben Carson's big words and fancy talk doesn't mean his plan wouldn't have worked for millions of Americans in need of medical care.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Proof?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
He said so dipshit. Are you also OK with rampant torture? He wants that too.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
You just want things handed to you and then pass the buck on to somebody else. You have that "entitlement mentality" and just want economic prosperity bestowed upon you.
Just like all those black people. Somehow, not racist to say that. According to you at least.
RaciSt fucking welfare mooch loser.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
? I don't have a problem with black people receiving those benefits.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Introduction: The provision of the Patriot Act, Section 326 - the "know your customer" provision, compelling financial institutions to demand identity documents before opening accounts or conducting financial transactions is a fundamental element of the outline below. That section authorized the executive branch to issue detailed regulations on the subject, found at 31 CFR 130.120-121. It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year. There are several ways to compel Mexico to pay for the wall including the following:
On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.On day 2 Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico. There is no significant social safety net provided by the state in Mexic
n day 3 tell Mexico that if the Mexican government will contribute the funds needed to the United States to pay for the wall, the Trump Administration will not promulgate the final rule, and the regulation will not go into effect.Trade tariffs, or enforcement of existing trade rules: There is no doubt that Mexico is engaging in unfair subsidy behavior that has eliminated thousands of U.S. jobs, and which we are obligated to respond to; the impact of any tariffs on the price imports will be more than offset by the economic and income gains of increased production in the United States, in addition to revenue from any tariffs themselves. Mexico needs access to our markets much more than the reverse, so we have all the leverage and will win the negotiation. By definition, if you have a large trade deficit with a nation, it means they are selling far more to you than the reverse - thus they, not you, stand to lose from enforcing trade rules through tariffs (as has been done to save many U.S. industries in the past).Cancelling visas: Immigration is a privilege, not a right. Mexico is totally dependent on the United States as a release valve for its own poverty - our approvals of hundreds of thousands of visas to their nationals every year is one of our greatest leverage points. We also have leverage through business and tourist visas for important people in the Mexican economy. Keep in mind, the United States has already taken in 4X more migrants than any other country on planet earth, producing lower wages and higher unemployment for our own citizens and recent migrants.Visa fees: Even a small increase in visa fees would pay for the wall. This includes fees on border crossing cards, of which more than 1 million are issued a year. The border-crossing card is also one of the greatest sources of illegal immigration into the United States, via overstays. Mexico is also the single largest recipient of U.S. green cards, which confer a path to U.S. citizenship. Again, we have the leverage so Mexico will back down.
Conclusion: Mexico has taken advantage of us in another way as well: gangs, drug traffickers and cartels have freely exploited our open borders and committed vast numbers of crimes inside the United States. The United States has borne the extraordinary daily cost of this criminal activity, including the cost of trials and incarcerations. Not to mention the even greater human cost. We have the moral high ground here, and all the leverage. It is time we use it in order to Make America Great Again.
On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.On day 2 Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico. There is no significant social safety net provided by the state in Mexic
n day 3 tell Mexico that if the Mexican government will contribute the funds needed to the United States to pay for the wall, the Trump Administration will not promulgate the final rule, and the regulation will not go into effect.Trade tariffs, or enforcement of existing trade rules: There is no doubt that Mexico is engaging in unfair subsidy behavior that has eliminated thousands of U.S. jobs, and which we are obligated to respond to; the impact of any tariffs on the price imports will be more than offset by the economic and income gains of increased production in the United States, in addition to revenue from any tariffs themselves. Mexico needs access to our markets much more than the reverse, so we have all the leverage and will win the negotiation. By definition, if you have a large trade deficit with a nation, it means they are selling far more to you than the reverse - thus they, not you, stand to lose from enforcing trade rules through tariffs (as has been done to save many U.S. industries in the past).Cancelling visas: Immigration is a privilege, not a right. Mexico is totally dependent on the United States as a release valve for its own poverty - our approvals of hundreds of thousands of visas to their nationals every year is one of our greatest leverage points. We also have leverage through business and tourist visas for important people in the Mexican economy. Keep in mind, the United States has already taken in 4X more migrants than any other country on planet earth, producing lower wages and higher unemployment for our own citizens and recent migrants.Visa fees: Even a small increase in visa fees would pay for the wall. This includes fees on border crossing cards, of which more than 1 million are issued a year. The border-crossing card is also one of the greatest sources of illegal immigration into the United States, via overstays. Mexico is also the single largest recipient of U.S. green cards, which confer a path to U.S. citizenship. Again, we have the leverage so Mexico will back down.Conclusion: Mexico has taken advantage of us in another way as well: gangs, drug traffickers and cartels have freely exploited our open borders and committed vast numbers of crimes inside the United States. The United States has borne the extraordinary daily cost of this criminal activity, including the cost of trials and incarcerations. Not to mention the even greater human cost. We have the moral high ground here, and all the leverage. It is time we use it in order to Make America Great Again.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
I was providing the memo for reading.
It looks like he would be expanding the definition to include money wire transfers. Technically they are not supposed to, by law, work in this country unless they are legal residents. So stopping them from wiring money out would be enforcing the law.
Which is what the executive branch is SUPPOSED to do. Enforce the laws. If he does not want to enforce it, he could change it.
But he wants to enforce them.
It looks like he would be expanding the definition to include money wire transfers. Technically they are not supposed to, by law, work in this country unless they are legal residents. So stopping them from wiring money out would be enforcing the law.
Which is what the executive branch is SUPPOSED to do. Enforce the laws. If he does not want to enforce it, he could change it.
But he wants to enforce them.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
then why did you literally just call them "special handouts for black people"?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you just complained about the patriot act, now you are rooting for donald trump to expand on it?
what the fuck happened to you? you are just a pile of stupid now.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
In your opinion, should we let the cartel decide whether or not we enforce the laws?
- Status