Do You Support The "Occupy"Protests?

Do you support the global "Occupy" protests?


  • Total voters
    234

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Sharing is caring????
Yup yup.

I got plans. Slowly everything is happening.
I've been to three states, and am going to Mexico soonish.

Soon people will run out of money in the streets, shit is going to get BADDDDDD...
We will probably hit a new economic depression during this time, as Canada's money has exceeded ours in value ALREADY I believe.
Shit will get bad, and people will start carrying guns...The people who end up in jail, will largely end up in gangs. And basically a lot of bad stuff is going to happen.

I am going to go to Mexico, and use my small amount of American money to buy shit like a king in Mexico, and support the "Real" American's, and not the ameriKans.
Then eventually once I have "Family" like ties in Mexico, I'm going to travel all over the world, and make an international "People's Diplomacy Network". So that there can be a global community. Even if it doesn't become "everyone", the people involved can still have a global community of friends. And if shit hits the fan politically and economically, we can be prepared to live without the two already.
 

Tales

Active Member
Yup yup.

I got plans. Slowly everything is happening.
I've been to three states, and am going to Mexico soonish.

Soon people will run out of money in the streets, shit is going to get BADDDDDD...
We will probably hit a new economic depression during this time, as Canada's money has exceeded ours in value ALREADY I believe.
Shit will get bad, and people will start carrying guns...The people who end up in jail, will largely end up in gangs. And basically a lot of bad stuff is going to happen.

I am going to go to Mexico, and use my small amount of American money to buy shit like a king in Mexico, and support the "Real" American's, and not the ameriKans.
Then eventually once I have "Family" like ties in Mexico, I'm going to travel all over the world, and make an international "People's Diplomacy Network". So that there can be a global community. Even if it doesn't become "everyone", the people involved can still have a global community of friends. And if shit hits the fan politically and economically, we can be prepared to live without the two already.
DAMN SON..... ummmmm, thats a bold move to leave to Mex... but I support it... love traveling and making networks!

I feel you on the situation on the streets... I am not gonna just walk away yet... gonna stick around and see what shakes out...

One thing is for sure... If and when change does come, and I am talking real change, it is not gonna come easy.... the people running shit now arent gonna go quietly...

People are conscience to be aware of phony leaders attempting to derail real progress...

anyways, I rant
 

wheels619

Well-Known Member
no. look at the oakland riots. half the people have no idea why they are there in the first place. just fallowing the masses. the half that do understand whats going on i respect what u r doing but the other half ruins it for everyone. in oakland they were breaking glass panes that would cost small businesses 8000 buck a piece. i.e. dentist offices and small bookstores. small privately run businesses that have nothing to do with why we r protesting in the first place. but they get hurt anyways? that just sounds redundant to me. what we need are educated younger officials to handle negotiations for us. just like the legalization of marijuana. younger smarter well educated people will take office and make the drastic changes we need. but remember everyone can be baught off. just has to be the right price thats named.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
DAMN SON..... ummmmm, thats a bold move to leave to Mex... but I support it... love traveling and making networks!

I feel you on the situation on the streets... I am not gonna just walk away yet... gonna stick around and see what shakes out...

One thing is for sure... If and when change does come, and I am talking real change, it is not gonna come easy.... the people running shit now arent gonna go quietly...

People are conscience to be aware of phony leaders attempting to derail real progress...

anyways, I rant
I have been planning Mexico since 8th grade. It has just become more mature, real, current, and developed.

I will make it so no one has to walk away. For any reason but one they make up.

The idea is not to take charge, present tools to the people. Just see what they need, and see how you can help. That's what the government should be anyways, "Public Servants", presenting "service". And the new government needs to be "By the people, for the people, and of the people" again.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Buck,
I don't support public education. Public schools don't teach proper usage of me and I! Obama is proof, "Obama often makes a common grammatical error, using the word 'I' when he should properly use 'me'—as in the phrase 'a very personal decision for Michelle and I.'"
Public school improperly teaches DNA is the hereditary factor. Lamark was 100% wrong. Which proves evolution is the end all explanation? Epigenetics proves, so far, both lamarkian and DNA theory partially explain heredity. That previously thought "junk" DNA can be activated.

Http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/plus/sfg/resources/res_epigenetics.xhtml

Public school used to teach "the ether" was the medium that transfered radio, light and magnetic waves.

Public school teaches (implies) liberal philosophy is the preferred moral standard. Liberal philosophy teaches kids about the homosexual lifestyle in elementary school in Massachusetts. Both are wrong to teach. Moral standard is subjective. Libertarianism doesn't exist in public school. It should be up to the parent when to teach alternative lifestyles to their children. If a parent disagrees, they shouldn't be sent to jail.

Http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1230620&page=1

Public school teaches with grades. That's a meaningless measure. Children learn concepts at different rates. The ones that learn slower are penalized, just as faster students are and get bored, thus can appear to perform poorly. Very few vocational classes, like wood shop or welding, are taught anymore. The focus is more on academics. There is more to the human quotient than intelligence. There's: emotional, mechanical, creative and "spirtual" quotients too.
The only way a child can become their full potential is through the process known as unschooling. A child can then develop all aspects of their potential at their own pace. A child mustn't be labeled, causing self doubt and become discouraged in life. Unlike what happened with me. It took several years to understand my thoughts, although diferent, weren't wrong. School brainwashes children and it took me years to undo that damage. The bells prepare children, not to be leaders, but slaves to the work clock. Children must be left to be children.

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unschooling
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
"School" is outdated. We don't need "Random Authority" being respected our children at 4-5 years old.
And we don't need to teach them like we do, they need to learn in a where where the "Lesson plan" is tied to the current issues.
That way kids can not only see the issues at hand their entire lives, and be prepared for them as an adult. But can maybe even SOLVE the problems as children, or when they grow up.
Some things can only be seen through the eyes of a child.
 

Tales

Active Member
That's not true. There are still "Real Motherfuckers" out there, they just don't put on monkey suits, and go on TV to tell lies to "their people".
I know its not completely true... but the system that is in place produces "sell outs" every f'ing one of them are sold out/bought into the corp/profits-over-everything scheme.

I know its not true cause I am a real muthaphucka right here!!

I dont trust the political structure or phony politicians that are sell outs.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
I know its not completely true... but the system that is in place produces "sell outs" every f'ing one of them are sold out/bought into the corp/profits-over-everything scheme.

I know its not true cause I am a real muthaphucka right here!!

I dont trust the political structure or phony politicians that are sell outs.
And people recognize "Real".
Times are changing. Your word will mean something again eventually.
 

Tales

Active Member
Truth be told.... been there done that.

I bought into the whole corp life shit.... and like the rest of the 99%, I got fucked in the end...

I never sold out, never... but I did buy into the mainstream idea of "life"...

Then I went through a reality check and have reclaimed my dignity...

All the folks who are maintaining the status-quo in the mainstream life... the reality check is coming your way too.... dont trip just be patient... you will see what the end result of solely focusing on "profit" as the "corp"/slavemasters conduct business...

What happens is the American debt slaves, we bail out the banks, because we are misguided by the very people who are benefiting from the bailout...

Its no secret that corporate leaders move seamlessly between public and private life these days... one day Mr. Smith is a appointed official, next day they are Chairman of the Board for corporation X...

Thats bad business, as the only thing that gains is the f'ing corporations... corporations that are comprised of f'ing human beings... human beings who are debt slaves, therefore they feel inclined to protect the business that provides a means to pay the slavemasters.... totally fuct, imo
 

Brick Top

New Member
Anti-capitalist Movement Turns Violent


By Stanley Kurtz



Perhaps because the Occupy Oakland protests yesterday turned violent in and through the night, Pacific Time, the blogoshere hasn’t yet had much chance to react. (Michelle Malkin is the exception.) Yesterday’s events mark an important moment in the evolution of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and not just because of the fires, the clashes with police, or the violence against banks and other businesses. Occupy Oakland deliberately sought to shut down the one of the largest ports in the United States — and succeeded in doing so.


The New York Times is playing this story as a small number of people who turned to violence after a day of mostly peaceful protests. Yet the point is that those “peaceful” protesters were trying to shut down a major American port, disrupting our economy at a moment of weakness. Both violently and non-violently, Occupy Oakland’s actions were an attack on the economy by a movement that largely rejects our system.


Here’s an excerpt from a CBS story headlined “Occupy protests go from peace to ‘chaos:’”


Organizers in Oakland had viewed the day as a significant victory. Police said that about 7,000 people participated in demonstrations throughout the day that were peaceful except for a few incidents of vandalism.


One of the protest leaders, Boots Riley, touted the day as a success, saying “we put together an ideological principle that the mainstream media wouldn’t talk about two months ago.”


His comments came before a group of demonstrators moved to break into the Travelers Aid building in order to, as some shouting protesters put it, “reclaim the building for the people.”


Riley, whose anti-capitalist views are well-documented, considered the port shut down particularly significant for organizers who targeted it in an effort to stop the “flow of capital.” The port sends goods primarily to Asia, including wine as well as rice, fruits and nuts, and handles imported electronics, apparel and manufacturing equipment, mostly from Asia, as well as cars and parts from Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Hyundai. An accounting of the financial toll from the shutdown was not immediately available.


The potential for the chaos that ultimately erupted was not something Riley wanted to even consider.


“If they do that after all this …” He paused, then added, “They’re smarter than that.”


But the peace that abided throughout the day, did not last into the night.


So an “anti-capitalist” leader of the demonstration did oppose the violence, but he also aimed to close the port of Oakland as part of an effort to jam up a system he hopes someday to overturn.


This early response to the Occupy protests by a blogger at the Chronicle of Higher Education is off-base in many respects, but gets one big point right: “We must end capitalism” has been the real point of the protests to date. Whether by shutting down a major American port or by violence in the streets, this is the message that unified the diverse tactics of Occupy Oakland last night.


http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282129/anti-capitalist-movement-turns-violent-stanley-kurtz
 

Tales

Active Member
stolen from fdd2blk's sig..... thought it was fitting....

-Originally Posted by dukeanthony
Bricktop
As usual you and your Republican Copy Paste hit jobs are full of shit
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
stolen from fdd2blk's sig..... thought it was fitting....

-Originally Posted by dukeanthony
Bricktop
As usual you and your Republican Copy Paste hit jobs are full of shit
he can't even add in a simple "i found this". :sleep:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Occupy Oakland is alive and as strong as ever today.


it's been getting into the low 30's. i may go take them some blankets. :)
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
"Both violently and non-violently, Occupy Oakland’s actions were an attack on the economy by a movement that largely rejects our system."

79 > 35

Your system.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
"So an “anti-capitalist” leader of the demonstration did oppose the violence, but he also aimed to close the port of Oakland as part of an effort to jam up a system he hopes someday to overturn."
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
Occupy Oakland is alive and as strong as ever today.


it's been getting into the low 30's. i may go take them some blankets. :)
Maybe they were only starting fires because theirs not enough blankets to go around....
 

wookieslinger

Active Member
If this occupation protests continue and escalate with violence the individuals involved will no longer be referred to as the protesters they will be labeled terrorist and will be treated as such.

15 years ago my graduation class had maybe 2/10 going into the armed service, now it seems like 8/10 are joining the service. It seems sometimes like the economy was broke intentionally to boost recruitment numbers.

All of the military bases in my area have been building larger and larger over the past 5 years.

I do not need some conspiracy theorist to bombard me with their ideals of what’s going. My deep understanding of history, the nature of man and my own two eyes is all I need to see this locomotive of oppression steaming towards all of us.

I really feel sorry for people on both coasts, chaos will spread like wild fire on the east and west.
 
Top