SupraSPL
Well-Known Member
Since I am waiting for drivers to get here I have nothing to build so I decided to measure the power and effectiveness of active cooling. I got a CPU heatsink (345grams) and 70mm fan and sanded the surface down to a 600 grit (lazy) and attached a Cree CXA3070 with Prolimatech PK2 thermal paste. Driving it with a Meanwell constant current driver that puts out 1.04A so the COB dissipates 37W. The fan is blowing air directly into the heatsink fins. I used an adjustable power supply for the fan so I could change the speed. I estimated Tj by carefully measuring the change in vF with a Fluke 115 multimeter. Ambient and heatsink temp was measured using an infrared baby food thermometer.
-First test was with no fan at all. This heatsink is not designed for passive cooling and would be way too small of course. Ambient temp was 18C. The heatsink reached 42C-45C, hottest in the middle. Tj reached 93 and was still rising slowly when I gave up waiting. For reference, with a correctly sized heatsink I get Tj of 44C with passive cooling and ambient temp of 21C.
-Second test the fan was running slowly at 5.2V. Heatsink stabilized at 26.5C. Tj stabilized at 42.5C. Fan consumed 1.6W.
-Third test turned the fan up to 7V. Heatsink stabilized at 24C. Tj stabilized at 34C. Fan consumed 1.8W.
-Fourth test turned the fan up to 8V. Tj stabilized at 33C. Fan consumed 2W.
So in summary, for a penalty of 5% efficiency, I was able to decrease the amount of aluminum required from 4.75 LBS to .75 LBS and achieve a ridiculously low Tj of 33C. It ads a bit of complexity and wiring to an already very complex installation and also ads the cost of the fans and power adapters. But on the other hand large aluminum heatsinks are getting very expensive and for a large grow they are actually very heavy, requiring a very sturdy frame to support them safely. I am not going to stop using passive cooling based on this test (because I get some active cooling from the circulation fans), but for those who are building DiY systems active cooling can serve them very well.
-First test was with no fan at all. This heatsink is not designed for passive cooling and would be way too small of course. Ambient temp was 18C. The heatsink reached 42C-45C, hottest in the middle. Tj reached 93 and was still rising slowly when I gave up waiting. For reference, with a correctly sized heatsink I get Tj of 44C with passive cooling and ambient temp of 21C.
-Second test the fan was running slowly at 5.2V. Heatsink stabilized at 26.5C. Tj stabilized at 42.5C. Fan consumed 1.6W.
-Third test turned the fan up to 7V. Heatsink stabilized at 24C. Tj stabilized at 34C. Fan consumed 1.8W.
-Fourth test turned the fan up to 8V. Tj stabilized at 33C. Fan consumed 2W.
So in summary, for a penalty of 5% efficiency, I was able to decrease the amount of aluminum required from 4.75 LBS to .75 LBS and achieve a ridiculously low Tj of 33C. It ads a bit of complexity and wiring to an already very complex installation and also ads the cost of the fans and power adapters. But on the other hand large aluminum heatsinks are getting very expensive and for a large grow they are actually very heavy, requiring a very sturdy frame to support them safely. I am not going to stop using passive cooling based on this test (because I get some active cooling from the circulation fans), but for those who are building DiY systems active cooling can serve them very well.