Consensus for Ideal Outcome

And most dgs had their plant count in multiple stages of growth. So alot of them were busted being over and closed.
The others were assumed to be just as shady and they were closed.
The illegal sales funded a super lawyer team to get a temporary pass for now
 
Also...you wouldn't scrap out what couldn't be shipped to your patient, you would store it. The licence specified how much and where it could be stored.
 
leaffan said:
Nope....he was within the limits.
Click to expand...
No if he was growing one plant and diverting it like he was it's still illigal. He had paperwork to grow the plants sure but he still diverted it to the bm. His post prove what I'm saying. So I'll say it again go read his post! It's all there.
 
Im saying that i dont know anything about hiitsme or anyones elses numbers.
I helped a dg for years and i personally got sick of watching them fuk the system for the real patients. But even then i simply quit helping and kept my mouth shut because it wasnt my business
 
Gmack420 said:
No if he was growing one plant and diverting it like he was it's still illigal. He had paperwork to grow the plants sure but he still diverted it to the bm. His post prove what I'm saying. So I'll say it again go read his post! It's all there.
Click to expand...
Nope...you are wrong again...he shipped it to his patient. that isn't diversion...
You should read it again, carefully.
 
leaffan said:
"So a dg could have four patients registered to the house."
A house could host 4 patients not a dg
Click to expand...
No a designated grower could have two patients and a partner or spouse could have two patients for a maximum of four patients per location. I shouldnt have said house
 
torontoke said:
Im saying that i dont know anything about hiitsme or anyones elses numbers.
I helped a dg for years and i personally got sick of watching them fuk the system for the real patients. But even then i simply quit helping and kept my mouth shut because it wasnt my business
Click to expand...

There were some good and some bad....just like here...
 
torontoke said: ↑
Im saying that i dont know anything about hiitsme or anyones elses numbers.
I helped a dg for years and i personally got sick of watching them fuk the system for the real patients. But even then i simply quit helping and kept my mouth shut because it wasnt my business


That's because...
YOU'RE NOT A FUCKNOSE!!! :lol: : Someone who sticks their nose in other peoples business.
 
torontoke said:
No a designated grower could have two patients and a partner or spouse could have two patients for a maximum of four patients per location. I shouldnt have said house
Click to expand...
uh...the... "So a dg could have four patients registered to the house. " was what you said....I was quoting you and correcting you.
A DG was allowed one patient initially, then it was increased to two. At the same time HC increased the maximum amount of patients per location to 4.
So you could have 2 dg with 2 patients each...or 4 dg with 1 patient each per location
 
gb123 said:
torontoke said: ↑
Im saying that i dont know anything about hiitsme or anyones elses numbers.
I helped a dg for years and i personally got sick of watching them fuk the system for the real patients. But even then i simply quit helping and kept my mouth shut because it wasnt my business


That's because...
YOU'RE NOT A FUCKNOSE!!! :lol: : Someone who sticks their nose in other peoples business.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to Gmack?
 
Because unlike the government i dont expect everyone to have the same beliefs and morals that i do.
I dont think im better than anyone i just didnt play along.
 
No i dont know gmack or anyone else on here. But i dont understand why gmack and gb seem to be attacking hiitsme in every thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top