Condoleeza as Romney's VP

P

Parker

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
We can talk about how Condoleeza Rice is a hyper intelligent black woman
Click to expand...
What does her skin color have to do with it? Racists like you are easy to spot. You can't help yourself. Is it her speaking patterns with no Negro dialect, unless she wanted to have one, the thing that convinced you?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Parker said:
What does her skin color have to do with it? Racists like you are easy to spot. You can't help yourself. Is it her speaking patterns with no Negro dialect, unless she wanted to have one, the thing that convinced you?
Click to expand...

I mention it becuase I know it burns you up inside
I would wager a bet that most people of all color are smarter than you
 
ctwalrus

ctwalrus

Active Member
Parker said:
What does her skin color have to do with it? Racists like you are easy to spot. You can't help yourself. Is it her speaking patterns with no Negro dialect, unless she wanted to have one, the thing that convinced you?
Click to expand...
jesus the race card has been blown out of preportion in the last decade...

its simply a viewable fact..
gonna pull the gender card because he caller her a woman?
how about get mad because he called her intelligent...
again a clear viewable confirmable fact...

condi is black.
 
P

Parker

Well-Known Member
ctwalrus said:
jesus the race card has been blown out of preportion in the last decade...

its simply a viewable fact..
gonna pull the gender card because he caller her a woman?
how about get mad because he called her intelligent...
again a clear viewable confirmable fact...

condi is black.
Click to expand...
I agree it has been blown out of proportion.
However, Condi is NOT defined by her being black. Being black is not what makes her. Her accomplishments do.
Do you say or hear anyone use race to describe Hillary Clinton? I haven't heard anyone say she's an intelligent white woman.

How about "We can talk about how Condoleeza Rice is a hyper intelligent person"
Being intelligent describes an accomplishment, being black or a woman describes something she was born with. If it doesn't matter why bring up race?
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Parker said:
I agree it has been blown out of proportion.
However, Condi is NOT defined by her being black. Being black is not what makes her. Her accomplishments do.
Do you say or hear anyone use race to describe Hillary Clinton? I haven't heard anyone say she's an intelligent white woman.

How about "We can talk about how Condoleeza Rice is a hyper intelligent person"
Being intelligent describes an accomplishment, being black or a woman describes something she was born with. If it doesn't matter why bring up race?
Click to expand...
Intelligence is congenital as well, however. It's akin to talent. Skill is an achievement related to talent ... not sure what the earned equivalent to intelligence is. cn
 
ctwalrus

ctwalrus

Active Member
Parker said:
I agree it has been blown out of proportion.
However, Condi is NOT defined by her being black. Being black is not what makes her. Her accomplishments do.
Do you say or hear anyone use race to describe Hillary Clinton? I haven't heard anyone say she's an intelligent white woman.

How about "We can talk about how Condoleeza Rice is a hyper intelligent person"
Being intelligent describes an accomplishment, being black or a woman describes something she was born with. If it doesn't matter why bring up race?
Click to expand...
its fucking aesthetics of that person!!

with the same logic you should never describe a person by the way they look
ie. supermodel with huge breasts... she sure as hell didn't earn those..

fuck man take it with a grain of salt..
and btw yes i have heard people talk about Hillarys' race

anyone and everyone should be proud of, yes, what they earned, but also who they are!
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Intelligence is congenital as well, however. It's akin to talent. Skill is an achievement related to talent ... not sure what the earned equivalent to intelligence is. cn
Click to expand...
She overcame a lot to be where she is

Tell me how "easy" it was for her to get to where she is being her age and black?

BTW
it's
Dr. Condoleeza Rice

And yes parker
She is black

Doesnt that just burn your little cracker heart up?
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
ChesusRice said:
She overcame a lot to be where she is

Tell me how "easy" it was for her to get to where she is being her age and black?

BTW
it's
Dr. Condoleeza Rice

And yes parker
She is black

Doesnt that just burn your little cracker heart up?
Click to expand...
If the bolded is directed at me, it does not seem to address my point.

And fwiw her name is spelled Condoleezza. cn
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Parker said:
You don't know much. Like how to spell because.


Wager a bet? That's the same word twice in a sentence. You make a bet or you make a wager or you'd wager.

Most people of all color Of all color? LOL You really are an imbecile aren't you?
Click to expand...
Wager is the verb
Bet is the noun

and you are still a shallow little racist
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Intelligence is congenitalcn
Click to expand...
So is religion. Should that excuse bigotry and hate? Intelligence has a genetic limiting factor that few achieve. Two people can get an A in a class, but one has to work twice as hard. A third can be just as intelligent as the one who tries half as hard, but doesn't try at all and gets a B, while a fourth gets an F doing the same.

There is instinctual and learned intelligence, which give the same result,but both are reached differently. You can apply number theory to elementary math. Multiplication is just fancy addition and division just subtraction. Any two even or same odd number added together give an even result. Using many other mathematical proofs, you can quickly do complex number manipulations. Or you could do what the traditionally educated learned in grade school: addition carry, subtraction borrow, multiplication tables, etc. Or a child can memorize advanced number theory proofs without knowing how they're derived. The F student would then get an A in traditional Calculus without trying using learned methods. The only difference between the traditionally educated and method trained would be the traditional A student comes up with their own methods similar to the methodically trained student.

This is why artificial intelligence is so difficult. Training a computer methods is what gives them intelligence. Like a computer, unless something is terribly wrong with it, it's the method.

Some people just have certain congenital methods. I think in the future, even without genetic manipulations, learned methods will eventually outperform congenital methods, making intelligence an outdated concept.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Canna Sylvan said:
So is religion. Should that excuse bigotry and hate? Intelligence has a genetic limiting factor that few achieve. Two people can get an A in a class, but one has to work twice as hard. A third can be just as intelligent as the one who tries half as hard, but doesn't try at all and gets a B, while a fourth gets an F doing the same.

There is instinctual and learned intelligence, which give the same result,but both are reached differently. You can apply number theory to elementary math. Multiplication is just fancy addition and division just subtraction. Any two even or same odd number added together give an even result. Using many other mathematical proofs, you can quickly do complex number manipulations. Or you could do what the traditionally educated learned in grade school: addition carry, subtraction borrow, multiplication tables, etc. Or a child can memorize advanced number theory proofs without knowing how they're derived. The F student would then get an A in traditional Calculus without trying using learned methods. The only difference between the traditionally educated and method trained would be the traditional A student comes up with their own methods similar to the methodically trained student.

This is why artificial intelligence is so difficult. Training a computer methods is what gives them intelligence. Like a computer, unless something is terribly wrong with it, it's the method.

Some people just have certain congenital methods. I think in the future, even without genetic manipulations, learned methods will eventually outperform congenital methods, making intelligence an outdated concept.
Click to expand...
Religion, congenital? Religion (in both senses, allegiance and intensity) is trained in. Intelligence is not. Perhaps we're using different definitions... to me intelligence is the organic component, while I don't have a good term for the trained-in/acquired component. cn
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Religion, congenital? Religion (in both senses, allegiance and intensity) is trained in. Intelligence is not. Perhaps we're using different definitions... to me intelligence is the organic component, while I don't have a good term for the trained-in/acquired component. cn
Click to expand...
Religious people use their temporal lobe differently. I was born into a strong religious family. I'm the only atheist.

Religious people can learn to use their temporal lobe differently. They can become like me or use their temporal lobe to the extreme which is how controlling cults work, like Scientology. Hubbard learned he could control others with trained methods.

Even without specific methods, most people have congenital methods which give a form of spirituality.

Over millenia, people learned methods which make perverse our otherwise benign congenital spiritual methods, or superstitions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top