Classifying Strains by Flavors (terpenes)

baldmountain

baldmountain

Active Member
Most people when thinking about strains classify them as either Sativa, Indica or a Hybrid. But today almost all available strains are some level of hybrid and honestly I don't feel like classifying something as a Sativa or an Indica is useful at all. We're interested in terpenes and flavors.

I was reading the book "Weed" and read about Kevin Jodrey's classification into Fruit, Floral, Fuel and Earth. I feel like this is a better way to think about different strains since it focuses on the flavors rather than where the strain may have come from 30 generations back.

I'm not sure I've ever tried a real Fruit or Earth strain. I know I hate Floral strains. (Anything that has even a hint of lavender makes me retch.) But what surprised me is almost everything I've ever grown has been some form of Fuel strain. This has made me rethink the strains I grow in order to explore the fruit and earth strains.

What do you think?
 
lokie

lokie

Well-Known Member
If you are keenly interested in an aromatic experience, you should try


D's Nuts
1681683220432.png
en.seedfinder.eu

D's Nuts Grow :: Breeder Info & Cannabis Strains

D's Nuts Grow: All cannabis strains and information about the cannabis breeder D's Nuts Grow in SeedFinders Cannabis Breeders Database...
en.seedfinder.eu en.seedfinder.eu

Perhaps your taste is more discerning. Try
1681683564858.png
en.seedfinder.eu

Cheesy Dick (Big Buddha Seeds) :: Cannabis Strain Info

Created in Spain, Moby dick is a Critcial Mass x Jack Herer hybrid. A very rewarding plant with its 'whale(large :-) ) like yields' and a strong 'high resin' content.It was a formality for us at Big Buddha Seeds to introduce our 'Old Skool Classic' t...
en.seedfinder.eu en.seedfinder.eu
 
Foxseeds

Foxseeds

Well-Known Member
Most terps have no psychoactive effects so what would the point be. beta-myrcene is the most psychoactive and it’s in both sativa dominant and indica dominant plants. A lot people don’t like beta-myrcene but it has a nice calming effect. A pinene and Linalool helps memory loss and anxiety, there’s some other minor effects but most terpenes, plant esters, thiols don’t have any psychoactive effects.
 
Last edited:
PopAndSonGrows

PopAndSonGrows

Well-Known Member
Ehh. I still don't think the Sativa/Indica convo is "useless" it still gives you an idea of the lineage, if you care about sort of thing (generally speaking, I do).

It's kind of like having a friend that's mix race: it 100% doesn't matter what race(s) they are BUT, as a friend, isn't that something you'd like to know about them? Their family, (some of) their history?
 
PopAndSonGrows

PopAndSonGrows

Well-Known Member
If we're going to stop talking about taxonomy then who gives a shit about where ANY weed came from? Why discuss terps? Why even smoke??? :lol: lol
 
Funkentelechy

Funkentelechy

Well-Known Member
I agree that the classifications for cannabis need to be revised, our current labels are not very scientific. The terms Sativa and Indica are tied to geographical regions, Indica Afghanistan and Sativa India. Could you imagine if there was one name for all birds that come from America? That would be silly. It might give you some indication that you could expect them to be a little different on average than say African birds, but it's a huge generalization. And, it really doesn't help you identify and differentiate individual species within the same geographical region, or the same species across different geographical regions and how they are interrelated.
A more accurate system based on genetics and inherited traits is what we need.
 
Last edited:
C

conor c

Well-Known Member
Funkentelechy said:
I agree that the classifications for cannabis need to be revised, our current labels are not very scientific. The terms Sativa and Indica are tied to geographical regions, Indica Afghanistan and Sativa India. Could you imagine if there was one name for all birds that come from America? That would be silly. It might give you some indication that you could expect them to be a little different on average than say African birds, but it's a huge generalization. And, it really doesn't help you identify and differentiate individual species within the same geographical region, or the same species across different geographical regions and how they are interrelated.
A more accurate system based on genetics and inherited traits is what we need.
Click to expand...
Yeah there trying to change it with the likes of broad leaf drug trait or wide leaf drug trait and thin leaf drug trait or narrow leaf drug trait as well as type 1 and 2 etc type one being thc dominant type two being 1 to 1 cbd to thc ratio type 3 being cbd dominate even then its not perfect and folks are slow to change and adopt it vs the old sativa and indica labels
 
Foxseeds

Foxseeds

Well-Known Member
I was looking into growing Japanese hemp and found this pretty useful info

“We all know there's two types of cannabis, Sativa and Indica. Using modern genetic testing methods the definitions are different from what we've believed.

Cannabis Sativa is narrow leaf European Hemp. Flowers early in August and September or even automatically(In modern cannabis botany Cannabis Ruderalis doesn't exist. It falls under Cannabis Sativa). It originated near the Caucasus Mountains in eastern Europe and Asia Minor.

Cannabis Indica is almost all drug varieties, including narrow leaf tropical ones. Indica evolved far to the east near the Chengdu Mountain region of China. All East Asian, SE Asian, and Indian varieties are Indica. All eastern hemp and seed strains, including Ace's Japanese Hokkaido strain, are also Cannabis Indica. Very different genetically from western hemp strains.

It's off topic but what we consider Indica, wide leaf central Asian drug cannabis, is Cannabis Indica Afghanica. It is likely South Asian drug cannabis that has been hybridized with Cannabis Sativa that drifted south and east from Eastern Europe/Kazakhstan and Iran. “

“The old sativa/indica/rudelaris taxonomy failed to differenciate properly non psychoactive hemp and non psychoactive wild cannabis vs psychoactive cultivars. While the new nld/wld/etc taxonomy is based on leaf traits which in my opinion is an unaccurate and childish way to classify properly cannabis, especially considering most of the hybrid genepool available nowadays to marijuana growers, and also doesn't classifies properly autoflowering or rudelaris genetics. “

“You can't classify cannabis by chemotypes because as you suggest because both Cannabis Sativa and Cannabis Indica can produce the same Chemotypes. As you move closer to the equator a Sativa strain will produce more THC, as you move a tropical Indica strain north it'll lose THC and increase CBD. “

Very few pure landrace varieties, most were hybridized at one point by humans
 
C

conor c

Well-Known Member
Foxseeds said:
I was looking into growing Japanese hemp and found this pretty useful info

“We all know there's two types of cannabis, Sativa and Indica. Using modern genetic testing methods the definitions are different from what we've believed.

Cannabis Sativa is narrow leaf European Hemp. Flowers early in August and September or even automatically(In modern cannabis botany Cannabis Ruderalis doesn't exist. It falls under Cannabis Sativa). It originated near the Caucasus Mountains in eastern Europe and Asia Minor.

Cannabis Indica is almost all drug varieties, including narrow leaf tropical ones. Indica evolved far to the east near the Chengdu Mountain region of China. All East Asian, SE Asian, and Indian varieties are Indica. All eastern hemp and seed strains, including Ace's Japanese Hokkaido strain, are also Cannabis Indica. Very different genetically from western hemp strains.

It's off topic but what we consider Indica, wide leaf central Asian drug cannabis, is Cannabis Indica Afghanica. It is likely South Asian drug cannabis that has been hybridized with Cannabis Sativa that drifted south and east from Eastern Europe/Kazakhstan and Iran. “

“The old sativa/indica/rudelaris taxonomy failed to differenciate properly non psychoactive hemp and non psychoactive wild cannabis vs psychoactive cultivars. While the new nld/wld/etc taxonomy is based on leaf traits which in my opinion is an unaccurate and childish way to classify properly cannabis, especially considering most of the hybrid genepool available nowadays to marijuana growers, and also doesn't classifies properly autoflowering or rudelaris genetics. “

“You can't classify cannabis by chemotypes because as you suggest because both Cannabis Sativa and Cannabis Indica can produce the same Chemotypes. As you move closer to the equator a Sativa strain will produce more THC, as you move a tropical Indica strain north it'll lose THC and increase CBD. “

Very few pure landrace varieties, even those were hybridized at one point by humans
Click to expand...
The last bit is assuming no human selection as with good selection you can still keep it potent without mans hand weed drifts to type two 1 to 1 cbd to thc ratio or type 3 low thc high cbd it naturally goes that way even in hot countries i guarantee without selection it will still turn hempy imo people often forget all the work those that came before us did with landraces and heirlooms far too easily
 
Kumarollitup

Kumarollitup

Active Member
Paul-n-Chukka said:
Nope.
A single genotype can put out different pheno expression depending on the environment. Each pheno expresses different terps.
Each consumers organoleptic perception differs from another.
So you have no way to categorize perceived odors.
And no reason to either.
Click to expand...
Heard…
 
Paul-n-Chukka

Paul-n-Chukka

Well-Known Member
All wide leaf is evolved from narrow leaf.
So everything is sativa..... if were talking about heritage.
Just as all people evolved from darker skinned bipeds.
But why categorize everything? Is your mind too simple to grasp the bigger picture?
 
Funkentelechy

Funkentelechy

Well-Known Member
Paul-n-Chukka said:
But why categorize everything?
Click to expand...
Because some strains grow better than others outdoors in my climate. I also prefer the high and or the flavor from certain strains more than others. So, once you find strains that work for you for whatever reason you can apply that knowledge to your future strain selections. That's handy I think.
What is the bigger picture? My mind is too simple to grasp.
 
G

grayeyes

Well-Known Member
Bald, I would take anything said by "Huckster" Kevin Jodfrey with MOUTHFULS of salt. He wants big Canna to hire him. He doesn't want you growing anything as he feels you are getting in his pocket.
 
Funkentelechy

Funkentelechy

Well-Known Member
Paul-n-Chukka said:
All wide leaf is evolved from narrow leaf.
So everything is sativa..... if were talking about heritage.
Just as all people evolved from darker skinned bipeds.
But why categorize everything? Is your mind too simple to grasp the bigger picture?
Click to expand...
To be clear, if we are talking about humans then I agree 110%. But when we're talking about cultivated crops labeling and categorization, something that limits our understanding of each other, is fundamental to our understanding of how to improve crops and our ability to cultivate them.
Sorry for being so snarky in my previous response.
 
Hook Daddy

Hook Daddy

Well-Known Member
I can see the point of view of not caring about the plant’s lineage from people that have smoked hybrids their whole lives. I see people saying they will not waste time growing sativas because they take too long all the time. It’s a shame, indica and sativa have a distinctly different high, and people that keep promoting hybrids are blending that difference away. I gave some of my Laughing Buddha to a few friends that smoke all the time, day and night. They were amazed and said they didn’t even know weed could have that effect, and definitely wanted more. I won’t go on and on, but one of the first things I look for in seeds is the lineage and sativa to indica ratio, leaning towards plants that have not been crossed from a landrace more than a few generations. I don’t care if they take 20 weeks in flower, it’s worth the wait. I don’t mind an indica buzz before bed, but during the day it’s sativas all the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top