Euh...
Seriously, when i read the announced topic it just didn't sound like this thread was necessarily expected to focus on the Kamloops aboriginal children of British Columbia, certainly not because their deaths are anything even remote of meaningless, on the contrary of course. The thing is, some of our most shameful memories get lost with the passage of time, only couple generations suffice for young persons to re-discover such stories with dismay. Better late than never, nonetheless was it really mandatory to find solid proof simply to listen and believe??
This double event illustrates how large parts of the country could remain totally "blind" to similar marginalization, this time performed in recent years (by live politicians & friend$) as i've often tried to bring related topics under attention myself, actually. I'm thinking of Justin Trudeau's Cannabis Act, followed by the even less reasonable reform of François Legault raising so-called "legal" age to 21 arguing it's to save "brains", while in fact i find that's basically intended to make sure our SQdC monopoly wouldn't risk to feed "illicit" resellers dealing with that same 18-21 group, now potentially criminalized more than ever and the "visible minorities" 3~4 times as often as the "average" citizen.
If we check on Québec's
Bloc Pot web site it's written the law (past 14) accomodates parents who chose to educate/prepare their whole family about alcohol consumption that has no "medical"/"recreative" equivalent unless one agrees it makes a great disinfectant... Which ain't to compare with PTSD "medication" (ref.:
Cpl. Ronald J. Francis, 1971-2014) vs seeking a THC-centric buzz to celebrate Canada day, with a delay.
There again i'll bet the name rings no bells in many cases.
Anyway my point revolves around the appearance of contrast when also reading that educating one's own natural kid to cannabis can send a parent to prison for up to 14 years if everyone in the "legal" realm continues to fail our country, one after the other, not to mention both levels of government have our virtual communities on their next electoralist menu it seems. Trudeau to manage "terrorism", Legault to "protect" public institutions (starting with parliamentarism...) via police budget adapted to cyber-criminality: 2 slightly different justifications but 1 same goal, to tighten up their grip although both the provincial and federal Charts of Rights in Québec garanty freedom of "association".
M'well instead i garanty some trojan horse reaching far beyond their announced agendas, including perhaps special attention for pro-cannabis people attempting to organize, via additional powers...
Death always been an efficient/powerful tool in Hollywood. Kamloops aboriginal children of British Columbia died twice, in their mind 1st then in their flesh; but that was quite a few generations ago and these days politicians ain't short of ideal accessorial groups to stigmatize (specially in a pre-electoral context). Who's aware that mass media & "social" forums altogether eventually happen to carry such mesmerizing symbols in a self-serving manner; for example our national TV network failing to warn vulnerable/unsuspecting audiences that the "science" of Trudeau would rely on decades of "addictionist" therapy expertise conveniently
juxtaposed to family medecine (possibly with hints of scientology "treatment"). Etc., etc.
Please revisit thread after the next wave of teenagers has turned into adults, 21+ ones in my province, that is.
Bonne St-Jean!!
View attachment 4929869