Arguable. I think Soros has global reach and has often been the site of criticism for using his charitable organizations as fronts for political action often inciting revolutions.
Anti-Trump protests so strong and well coordinated make spontaneity unlikely to the reasoning observer who makes out that ”someone is stirring the pot because America has never traditionally had a problem with accepting the outcome of an election,” as one analyst put it.
Arguable. I think Soros has global reach and has often been the site of criticism for using his charitable organizations as fronts for political action often inciting revolutions.
Anti-Trump protests so strong and well coordinated make spontaneity unlikely to the reasoning observer who makes out that ”someone is stirring the pot because America has never traditionally had a problem with accepting the outcome of an election,” as one analyst put it.
Arguable. I think Soros has global reach and has often been the site of criticism for using his charitable organizations as fronts for political action often inciting revolutions.
Anti-Trump protests so strong and well coordinated make spontaneity unlikely to the reasoning observer who makes out that ”someone is stirring the pot because America has never traditionally had a problem with accepting the outcome of an election,” as one analyst put it.
It really depends on the lawyers, and their objectives.
But lawyers retained by our own shadow oligarchs will be guided to produce what the oligarchs want.
Then, in twenty years, we invade Mexico and get our collective ass handed to us, Vladolf style.