Braindead 0bama supporters, wkae up!

Moebius

Moebius

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
Another deceptive and time constrained graph posted by Obama sheep, its called a recession. :dunce:

Shouldn't we compare the "job creation" numbers to before the recession? Or would that expose your agenda? For a President to claim "job creation" is pretty lulz anyway.

You are doing it wrong. bongsmilie
Click to expand...
Were not the Republicans against GM bailout? .... In Europe its been reported as a great success that saved many jobs.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
Another deceptive and time constrained graph posted by Obama sheep, its called a recession. :dunce:

Shouldn't we compare the "job creation" numbers to before the recession? Or would that expose your agenda? For a President to claim "job creation" is pretty lulz anyway. The job creation is barely keeping up with population growth LOL. (approx. 150k per month needed for population increase)

You are doing it wrong. bongsmilie
Click to expand...
Oh added this after I retorted...

Shouldn't we look at the factors that caused the recession?

You're a liar anyway, we all know you're just another right wing economy student. Let's hear how "Survival of the fittest" is a natural law.

The smartest thing you can say against Obama is that he blames the GOP for everything, but that is only because it is so hard to believe that the GOP really cause ALL the problems.





 
Moebius

Moebius

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:


The right and left working together bongsmilie


Stop pretending that the right is the only problem in America.
Click to expand...
I think the far-left agree with with Paul that its the failure of the mainstream politics to deal with monetary policy that causes much of the instability seen in the markets across the world. I think thats where the similarity ends.

Ron Pauls a doctor but doesnt agree with universal healthcare. Crazy. He'll heal you but only if you can afford to pay him. lol
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
They echo "Free-Market" repeatedly and decry socialism everywhere. I don't think either system has been truly tested in history. Libertarian Socialism doesn't stand a chance against the mainstream ignorance. Competition drives innovation, ergo military trickle-down tech. Start solving problems with a more cooperative philosophy in every thought and action. Open source philosophy has proven to be efficient. Peace.
 
lordjin

lordjin

Well-Known Member
Moebius said:
Well I know what inbreeding is .... Its what I do with my plants.

I wanna know how this applies to the thread? Its something I missed as I'm not in the U.S

nevermind ...lol
Click to expand...
Yes, inbreeding is an unfortunate problem in our country.
 
Moebius

Moebius

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
They echo "Free-Market" repeatedly and decry socialism everywhere. I don't think either system has been truly tested in history. Libertarian Socialism doesn't stand a chance against the mainstream ignorance. Competition drives innovation, ergo military trickle-down tech. Start solving problems with a more cooperative philosophy in every thought and action. Open source philosophy has proven to be efficient. Peace.
Click to expand...
I don't think competition drives innovation. I believe that's a lie perpetuated by the free-marketeers.

I believe necessity drives true innovation. All competition does is it gives an incentive for people/companies to convince you that you 'need' their stuff.

e.g. Look at computer companies or the producers of TV's, desperatly trying to tell us we all need the latest model with the slickest screens and the smoothest curves.... Really? We all know it Bullshit..... I'll keep my cheapo budget 'dumb' mobile phone and my 32" LCD I bought 4 years ago, they work great.

All of our economies are eventually going to fail dramatically. Their existence is predicated upon the lie that we need to perpetually consume. Gradually there is a wakening of our collective human consciousness. Natural laws are shaping our minds whether we like it or not and as a species I remain confident we'll reject the ideas of olde.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Moebius said:
I don't think competition drives innovation. I believe that's a lie perpetuated by the free-marketeers.

I believe necessity drives true innovation. All competition does is it gives an incentive for people/companies to convince you that you 'need' their stuff.

e.g. Look at computer companies or the producers of TV's, desperatly trying to tell us we all need the latest model with the slickest screens and the smoothest curves.... Really? We all know it Bullshit..... I'll keep my cheapo budget 'dumb' mobile phone and my 32" LCD I bought 4 years ago, they work great.

All of our economies are eventually going to fail dramatically. Their existence is predicated upon the lie that we need to perpetually consume. Gradually there is a wakening of our collective human consciousness. Natural laws are shaping our minds whether we like it or not and as a species I remain confident we'll reject the ideas of olde.
Click to expand...
I think that the competitive nature is the problem. This shit doesn't work, they are focused on creating jobs. Think about that for a second, let it sink in. Forget about the fact that we think having a job is holy and just ponder it. Why the fuck would you want to CREATE JOBS? Lol I would think it would be better, in the name of efficiency, to you know, get the jobs done. It is a rat race from morning through rush hour to an argument at home in the evening. Our own government is in competing split factions. I'm sure there is an app to fix that.

I'm convinced that our strategy is to grow Opium in A-stan just to keep Pakistan high as shit. Same thing the British Empire did to China for centuries and it worked. Who drew those borders anyway? British Right wing colonial dick heads, philosophical ancestors of American Neocons. They were even the ones who rewrote India's history to create a fake history for Nazism. That fake history is still taught in some US colleges, it is called the Aryan Invasion Theory.

"Survival of the fittest", is a right wing meme. The phrase wasn't coined by Darwin, but by Herbert Spencer, a British economist.
 
Moebius

Moebius

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"Survival of the fittest", is a right wing meme. The phrase wasn't coined by Darwin, but by Herbert Spencer, a British economist.
Click to expand...
Darwin publishes his book under the title of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

The later part is commonly left out in modern publications.

edit:
I make no claim to Darwin view on race. But this was the title of his book published in 1859.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
Moebius said:
Were not the Republicans against GM bailout? .... In Europe its been reported as a great success that saved many jobs.
Click to expand...
GM is doing better because they closed US plants and diverted most of their money to Mexico plants. Also GM CEO got caught lobbying with tax payer money, can you guess who the lobby money went to? No one can use GM as a success story, while it saved a company it screwed a nation. It takes about 5 minutes of investigation to figure out Obama-moters was a bad joke.

The dream act is NOT a fix for illegal immigration, its another band aid on an hemorrhaging wound. Kinda like the bank bail outs, It changed very little of how reckless they are, all it did was prolong the inevitable. If the federal court throws out Obama care, which I think they will, he will have almost zero accomplishments, he will only be able to harp about the stimulus which is very controversial, he could have gave each US citizen that filed taxes $10,000 talk about stimulate an economy! There was a lot of stupid shit the stimulus money went to thing so stupid you can't even make excuses for.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Moebius said:
Darwin publishes his book under the title of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

The later part is commonly left out in modern publications.
Click to expand...
His final editions did not include it. Many species preserve cooperation as a beneficial trait. Even very primitive ones. Besides, the science is evolving, and economists are still using old editions to back their philosophies. This is akin to insisting the world is flat.
 
Moebius

Moebius

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
His final editions did not include it. Many species preserve cooperation as a beneficial trait. Even very primitive ones. Besides, the science is evolving, and economists are still using old editions to back their philosophies. This is akin to insisting the world is flat.
Click to expand...
I don't see where this is going. I'm unaware of economists conflating Darwinian evolution to fit monetary policy. Is this a tatic of the U.S right wing now? strange since a significant number of them favor creationism over his thesis on the origin of man.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top