Bloomberg to the rescue

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ah yes, my bad. I wasn't considering the other 4%, because I see that as a wash when it comes to what people typically spend on health care every year.

I will give you that one though. I guess you'll have to raise the cost of your services, as you're self-employed. Cost of doing business and all.
i pay for insurance that I have used twice in the last decade. A nail in the finger and a razor blade in my hand. I look at it as me basically paying for everyone else who needs non-acute, ongoing care.

The fact that you have to lie about doubling the taxes of a solidly middle class, blue collar roughneck is all the proof I need that you are pushing for a nominee who will lose to trump, guaranteed

You are an obvious fraud
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
wrong

I make 50-60 a year and my taxes would nearly double
Sanders say's long term you will actually save money on your Health Insurance, but who really gives a fuck about saving $5000 over a 10 year period when your simply trying to pay today's bills?
It will take years for Sanders plan to be enacted, if ever, because you know the Insurance Companies/Republicans are going to litigate the shit out of it, and they will gladly do it, and probably win in the Supreme Court the way things are going.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Got it. You don't have an answer to debate me with because you know that my answer is most correct. Just answer the question or stop your ridiculous rhetoric.
That's not what I said. Ask me a question to clarify what I've actually said and I'll answer. I'm under no obligation to clairify what I didn't say. How dumb is that? What you are engaging in is false and deceptive rhetoric. You are becoming repetitive and boring just like Rob Roy.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Sanders say's long term you will actually save money on your Health Insurance, but who really gives a fuck about saving $5000 over a 10 year period when your simply trying to pay today's bills?
It will take years for Sanders plan to be enacted, if ever, because you know the Insurance Companies/Republicans are going to litigate the shit out of it, and they will gladly do it, and probably win in the Supreme Court the way things are going.
gasp

Do you mean to say that Sanders is not being fully honest with us? I thought only his followers like @PJ Diaz were effing liars. I mean, since when does a lying politician attract a pack of liars as followers.

Shocked I am. Shocked.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
That's not what I said. Ask me a question to clarify what I've actually said and I'll answer. I'm under no obligation to clairify what I didn't say. How dumb is that? What you are engaging in is false and deceptive rhetoric. You are becoming repetitive and boring just like Rob Roy.
I see why you don't want to answer the question. It's because my answer was correct.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Nobody believes you

Go cite another political ad.

LOL
At least we both agree that Bernie has the most support of all Democrat voters thus far. That and that the primary focus is to beat Trump in November. At least we agree on two things.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
let's see how that washes out after next Tuesday.
Iowa (red anyway), NH (should be a bern shut-out) and nevada (same as '16)
Sure. He should have somewhere between 650 and 725 delegates by that point, which will only leave around 750 total delegates (including those of the already concluded primaries) left to divide among the rest of the pack.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sure. He should have somewhere between 650 and 725 delegates by that point, which will only leave around 750 total delegates (including those of the already concluded primaries) left to divide among the rest of the pack.
so in other words he’ll get less than the alternatives
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The increase in public taxes is offset by the elimination of private taxes (copays, deductibles, premiums) so the majority of Americans receive a net decrease in taxes
 
Top