Bill Maher Stands Up For Ron Paul & Calls His Audience Brainwashed Liberals

deprave

deprave

New Member
Bill Maher Stands Up For Ron Paul & Calls His Audience Brainwashed Liberals


Now that's a real liberal, a real progressive. All about progress, civil liberties, the constitution, human rights, and anti-war.


A real liberal...not like you fake "brain washed liberals" who support crooks like King Obama, Numero Uno Civil Rights and Constitution Violator of the decade.
[video=youtube;4hb6AQ57Peg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hb6AQ57Peg&feature=youtu.be[/video]


It is time, grow a sack and take the red pill, revive classic liberalism, restore the constitution, bring back our civil liberties, or social liberties, our economic liberties...It is time we elect Ron Paul to restore america.
 
J

jagdog3

Well-Known Member
Keep Dreaming....But it ain't gonna happen...his foreign policy views will never allow him to be serious threat in the election...
 
sso

sso

Well-Known Member
heck, id give ron paul a shot just for the pot thing.

i mean, come on, he Cant be any worse than the previous presidents (though admittedly, never say never (gulp))

(and looking at the previous presidents track record, they were all the same and did all the same things, obama has been no exception)

(though, in all likelihood, the common herd is going to be swayed into voting for whatever is the dish of the day and things will get a little worse than yesterday (governmentally,though, actually, the actual people, get a little better every day, so there is hope)
 
sso

sso

Well-Known Member
though, on when bill maher quotes ron paul "we´ve got an empire"

ron paul looks alot like julius cesars younger brother (though a mix of julius and the freaky old guy in the Burbs (old tom hanks movie) (oh yeah and a turtle :))

so, its a bit scary thought, getting another julius cesar on the throne, then we talking war, war,war till someone stabs the bastard and puts him out of our misery, so

lets hope he smokes way too much pot for that to be possible :)(and yeah, u.s is just the latest empire and those things have been burning out faster and faster..)
 
Dan Kone

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
sso said:
so, its a bit scary thought, getting another julius cesar on the throne, then we talking war, war,war till someone stabs the bastard and puts him out of our misery
Click to expand...
Caesar:
1.1.gif

Julius Caesar fought for income equality, better paying jobs, free grain doles (Rome's version of food stamps), and was a man of the people.


Cato the younger was a batshit crazy old man, a millionaire, fought to keep Rome exactly how it was at the founding of the republic, ignored the economic realities and suffering of the common people in Rome because he was wrapped up in far right wing free market economic philosophy. He pursued that goal even though it meant the people of Rome were starving in the streets so the ultra-wealthy could enjoy total economic freedom. He considered that philosophy more important than the effect on the people of Rome. To him that was freedom and if people were starving to death that was their own fault. (pretty easy to say when you're a millionaire with slaves to do your work for you). Other than his small loyal group of followers he was universally hated and ignored by the rest of Rome. Sound familiar?

This is Cato:

cato.jpg
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dan Kone said:
Caesar:
View attachment 2010118

Julius Caesar fought for income equality, better paying jobs, free grain doles (Rome's version of food stamps), and was a man of the people.


Cato the younger was a batshit crazy old man, a millionaire, fought to keep Rome exactly how it was at the founding of the republic, ignored the economic realities and suffering of the common people in Rome because he was wrapped up in far right wing free market economic philosophy. He pursued that goal even though it meant the people of Rome were starving in the streets so the ultra-wealthy could enjoy total economic freedom. He considered that philosophy more important than the effect on the people of Rome. To him that was freedom and if people were starving to death that was their own fault. (pretty easy to say when you're a millionaire with slaves to do your work for you). Other than his small loyal group of followers he was universally hated and ignored by the rest of Rome. Sound familiar?

This is Cato:

View attachment 2010140
Click to expand...

  • You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Dan Kone again.





that post deserves rep, but you'll have to settle for a like. when you use someone's own words against them so sharply, well, that is how we define 'ownage'.

now if only we could go back to feeding christians to the lions.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Little history lesson for those who think Julius was Emperor of Rome.

Julius Caesar never became Emperor of Rome, he was assassinated as Dictator of Rome.
 
PetFlora

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
If Bill F'n Maher can wake up, anyone can wake up. Don't let the media continue to fool and sway you
 
sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Dan Kone said:
Caesar:
View attachment 2010118

Julius Caesar fought for income equality, better paying jobs, free grain doles (Rome's version of food stamps), and was a man of the people.


Cato the younger was a batshit crazy old man, a millionaire, fought to keep Rome exactly how it was at the founding of the republic, ignored the economic realities and suffering of the common people in Rome because he was wrapped up in far right wing free market economic philosophy. He pursued that goal even though it meant the people of Rome were starving in the streets so the ultra-wealthy could enjoy total economic freedom. He considered that philosophy more important than the effect on the people of Rome. To him that was freedom and if people were starving to death that was their own fault. (pretty easy to say when you're a millionaire with slaves to do your work for you). Other than his small loyal group of followers he was universally hated and ignored by the rest of Rome. Sound familiar?

This is Cato:

View attachment 2010140
Click to expand...
Yes, even though Julius Caesar is the reason why the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Julius wasn't some social care taker in president, the man was a Dictator and sparked civil war in the country.

If this is your idea of a great leader..
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
sync0s said:
Yes, even though Julius Caesar is the reason why the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Julius wasn't some social care taker in president, the man was a Dictator and sparked civil war in the country.

If this is your idea of a great leader..
Click to expand...
Really, I am shocked at the people applauding Caesar lmao! I hope they aren't Christians that would be a double whammy...but you know I guees I am not...It would be a blue pill taker to praise such a man, I believe he said 'Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt' or something to that effect. Turkey recently was an extreme paradox of this, in turkey without democracy all they had was the games to voice their frustration and express freedom but I digress....

In America well we have a bit more then that but basically it still goes back to Bread and circuses. America the new Rome eh?

Perhaps Edward Bernay's is given too much credit sometimes, I think Casear deserves a bit of credit for pacifying the masses, but it is Bernay's who corrupted democracy so I won't take that away from him.

[video=youtube;8_3QLMDQ8PQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_3QLMDQ8PQ[/video]


And then you know it all comes back full circle to what Bill Maherer said here, "Brain Washed Liberals" ...You see it was written that "Casear Gave them bread" so he must be good right? Wow he sounds a lot like Barrack Obama so he must be good right? Afterall King Obama is the holier than thou emperor messiah. Mao gave them bread as well, was he good? Stalin? If you give them bread but slaughter millions are you good? Yes....Yes...I went there...Thread nearly godwin'd....but yes..Bread and Circuses.....OBEY!
 
sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
Really, I am shocked at the people applauding Caesar lmao! I hope they aren't Christians that would be a double whammy...but you know I guees I am not...It would be a blue pill taker to praise such a man, I believe he said 'Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt' or something to that effect. Turkey recently was an extreme paradox of this, in turkey without democracy all they had was the games to voice their frustration and express freedom but I digress....

In America well we have a bit more then that but basically it still goes back to Bread and circuses. America the new Rome eh?

Perhaps Edward Bernay's is given too much credit sometimes, I think Casear deserves a bit of credit for pacifying the masses, but it is Bernay's who corrupted democracy so I won't take that away from him.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Chain of events included terrorism, which led to Senators appointing temporary dictators to handle the problem, which led to obvious reduction in power in the Senate, eventually led to civil war where Caesar became the sole ruler. He then instituted many policies intended to increase his power including (but not limited to) land "reform" policies that were intended to take power away from the wealthy.

Finally, he was murdered by some of the Senators. http://ancienthistory.about.com/cs/caesar1/a/caesartriumvir.htm

Off note: tool has weird music videos.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
It was the right wing who started the drug war in this country. Can you make that piece fit into the analogy? Awesome thread by the way.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
It was the right wing who started the drug war in this country. Can you make that piece fit into the analogy? Awesome thread by the way.
Click to expand...
True. It was Nixon who officially kicked off the war on drugs. Every president since (right and left wing) have escalated it, Obama is certainly doing his part.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
True. It was Nixon who officially kicked off the war on drugs. Every president since (right and left wing) have escalated it, Obama is certainly doing his part.
Click to expand...
I proved you wrong with facts in another thread bro, you are spreading falsehoods and you are a "brainwashed Neocon". Only Ron Paul has a stance more conducive to cannabis prohibition abolition than Obama. Don't forget that Ron Paul is also not a true GOPer. Obama is not escalating the war on drugs, he may be doing many things "wrong", that is NOT one of them. Please stop making me defend Obama, attack him for NDAA or not keeping his promise of pulling out of Iraq in 16 months, you know, something TRUE. Liar.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
I proved you wrong with facts in another thread bro, you are spreading falsehoods and you are a "brainwashed Neocon". Only Ron Paul has a stance more conducive to cannabis prohibition abolition than Obama. Don't forget that Ron Paul is also not a true GOPer. Obama is not escalating the war on drugs, he may be doing many things "wrong", that is NOT one of them. Please stop making me defend Obama, attack him for NDAA or not keeping his promise of pulling out of Iraq in 16 months, you know, something TRUE. Liar.
Click to expand...
You didn't prove anything. I am going to cut/paste Jogro's response about Obama's culpability in the crack down on dispensaries, as he said it much better than I:

"LOL. I was once that young and naive, too.

First of all, the President AG, and US Attourneys are SUPPOSED to obey and enforce the law.

But we all know damn well that they sometimes ignore or deliberately break the law. Go read about "Operation Fast and Furious" a bit if you think the Obama administration loves obeying the law.

Next, NO US law enforcement agency has the budget to vigorously enforce EVERY law. They'll enforce egregious violations, if they need to, but every enforcement agency SETS PRIORITIES.

The priorities are set at the top by the AG, who acts at the behest of the President. In short, the President sets the tone for his administration in terms of what priorities he wants his LE to pursue.

If Obama doesn't want Federal MJ law enforced, all he has to tell the AG, DEA, etc not to enforce it. He could say, "MJ is low priority for my administration, go concentrate on busting heroin and coke dealers instead", and their response would either be "Yes, Mr. President" or "Here is my resignation".

And in fact that's EXACTLY what he DID do at the beginning of his administration. Recently, he reversed course, and directed the AG to go pursue MMJ dispensaries.

You can speculate about why (obviously "politics", but which politics?), but the recent crackdown on MMJ in CA and elsewhere is the DIRECT result of an explicit change in policy by the Obama administration.

Obama is directly responsible for it, period. "
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
You didn't prove anything. I am going to cut/paste Jogro's response about Obama's culpability in the crack down on dispensaries, as he said it much better than I:

"LOL. I was once that young and naive, too.

First of all, the President AG, and US Attourneys are SUPPOSED to obey and enforce the law.

But we all know damn well that they sometimes ignore or deliberately break the law. Go read about "Operation Fast and Furious" a bit if you think the Obama administration loves obeying the law.

Next, NO US law enforcement agency has the budget to vigorously enforce EVERY law. They'll enforce egregious violations, if they need to, but every enforcement agency SETS PRIORITIES.

The priorities are set at the top by the AG, who acts at the behest of the President. In short, the President sets the tone for his administration in terms of what priorities he wants his LE to pursue.

If Obama doesn't want Federal MJ law enforced, all he has to tell the AG, DEA, etc not to enforce it. He could say, "MJ is low priority for my administration, go concentrate on busting heroin and coke dealers instead", and their response would either be "Yes, Mr. President" or "Here is my resignation".

And in fact that's EXACTLY what he DID do at the beginning of his administration. Recently, he reversed course, and directed the AG to go pursue MMJ dispensaries.

You can speculate about why (obviously "politics", but which politics?), but the recent crackdown on MMJ in CA and elsewhere is the DIRECT result of an explicit change in policy by the Obama administration.

Obama is directly responsible for it, period. "
Click to expand...
Even if he is responsible for cracking down on dispensaries, the opinion that he is escalating the war on drugs is still false. THERE WERE NO DISPENSARIES BEFORE 2008!

Besides, who gives a shit about dispensaries? If you think the freedom to buy a commercial product is better than owning the means of production, than you need a lesson on freedom. My stance is not disproved by this. In fact the assertion I made that Obama is not leading the charge against commercial growers and only forced to allow neocons to undo the progress he allowed isn't even disproved by this. All this proves is that you choose to believe, despite facts, that Obama loves cannabis prohibition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top