Arizona Immigration Reform Laws.

Status
Not open for further replies.

CrackerJax

New Member
Such a irrelevant post to make on a website dedicated to an illegal substance website.

You do realize marijuana is illegal right?
I see.... you equate smoking a joint with crossing into another country illegally.

I'll ask one more time.... tell me...what happens to you in reverse? RED enters Mexico illegally......what happens to you?


** GD FDD!! .... maybe ur right.... I so want to type "it".
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I see.... you equate smoking a joint with crossing into another country illegally.
Yeah I think they are both economically stupid laws that do no good. If someone wants to come here and contribute to society then they should be welcomed with open arms.

I'll ask one more time.... tell me...what happens to you in reverse? RED enters Mexico illegally......what happens to you?
As an American if someone leaves to another country how does that affect me? It means that there is now less competition for goods so that means I can now have more opportunities here at home. If they are more productive here than I am the economy here suffers and the place they moved to gets that added benefit of another productive worker that is needed because otherwise they would not have hired them.
 

slomoking13

Well-Known Member
Yeah almost all numbers in those things are garbage, that guy should have just assumed that. But he was right in pointing out it was garbage.

Ill give you that, the numbers are jacked. The whole underlying point is to show you that illegal immigrants are able to use services that legal american citizens aren't able to use because they make too much money. But the legal citizen ends up spending more for the same services and can end up making less money in the long run than an illegal immigrant.

I will use your example about how stupid it is to think that these people are hurting anything.

1. Anyone can do what he is doing, working under the table is something that is not just left to illegal immigrants, any kid can do those jobs in high school and totally get away with it, as well as any adult that is on hard times.

That would depend on the employer's willingness to break the laws which is why employers need to be regulated.


2. Assuming that with two jobs and those wages he works about 40 hours at the busing job, and what maybe 20? for the other, meaning about 31k a year from busing (Not a chance in hell but we roll with it) and 12k a year from construction work, adding up to 43k a year. Meaning if that was someones take home pay it would have to have been 55k a year and ten taken out for taxes (43k * 1.25 = (about 53k) for federal (53k * 1.0336(AZ state tax) = $55k (just under).

He works full time both jobs

3. You say he bought a new ford truck, so either he paid in cash for it, or he took out a loan, with no real documents (DL or otherwise) unless he is using a stolen id, which doesn't matter, the money still has to get to the dealership before he gets it right? So right there is about 30k back into our economy. Take it he needs to eat right? So lets go real cheap at about $200 a month in food, with a truck that big about $100 a month easy in gas right? Rent figure about $400 for the cheapest places. So assuming that he only spends an additional $150 for everything else (which with the truck he drives is highly doubtful that all these numbers are even close to what he spends(like insurance for that truck)) that would mean that at least $10k a year goes directly into the hands of different businesses in your area.

More backround on Louis: he and his 2 brothers live with his aunt and don't pay rent (they live in what was a 2 car garage that they added on to and turned into a little guest house type of deal on his aunts property)... Also, whenever they need to buy a vehicle or do anything that requires paperwork or id's, their aunt gets it for them since she is legal. His aunt has been here legally for a long time. When Louis was a kid, his parents got him and his brothers accross the border to their aunt and they stayed behind in Mexico with the rest of his brothers and sisters. Him and his brothers send half of the money they make back to their family.


Add to that the $30k truck purchase (Dealerships are large contributors to local economies), and since you mentioned that you are a college educated person with a good job, and he lives nearby he most likely spends far more than that.

I honestly couldn't tell you exactly what he spends, he sells a lot of cocaine on the side too, so for all i know he could be putting 30k a year back in the economy and sending a lot more back to Mexico.


So by removing him, your community is losing out on that buying power. And maybe someone decides to be a bus boy and someone else becomes a part time laborer, but yeah that doesn't mean that they are going to hire a worker for those jobs. If the business owner is shady, or crappy at paper work, or just doesn't want to take on the added costs of a documented worker, they will likely just pass on them.

He employs legal workers too. He starts them at about 10 dollars an hour to compensate for the extra taxes he pays on them.


Especially because most busboys just work off tips (and am willing to be that almost every waiter and busboy in the us doesn't pay the taxes they should on the money they collect, so is this even really an illegal thing?)from the waiters that they clear tables for, it is just easier for them not to hire and leave it up to the waiters to clear more. But even there, you can see how if the tables are not cleared as fast they will not be cleared as fast, and that means less revenue for the business due to longer wait times and people choosing to go somewhere else.

He is there to be a janitor but he busses tables too if they are busy. He doesn't get tips, the owner of the bar and grill just pays him flat rate.


4. And lets look at how 'good' behavior that this bill is supposed to do affects the contractor. The contractor that uses his labor may find that with having to pay $20-$30 (total costs) with documented labor that he can no longer charge the same low prices, and dramatically loses business until he is forced to close shop. This allows other businesses to now be able to charge a bit more, and eventually as several of the smaller companies that work under the table go out of business due to increased costs of workers, those business owners are forced to work in larger companies for the minimums what $15-$20 an hourish (still costs the company about $30-$40ish to hold them though with insurances, taxes, ect).

So that sounds good right? Until you look at the fact the prices for that work will sky rocket as competition gets choked out. Less work will be performed, and the many people that would like to have that work done will not be able to afford it and decide now is not the right time.

All those businesses that rely on them, like paint shops for painters, landscaping for (you get the idea) all are hit hard and have to shut down, and again with less competition the remaining companies can increase the prices to the level they need to be to survive. And again there will be an increase in all those services.

Yeah, but at the same time.. Those businesses are keeping prices artifically low because they are cheating the system and hiring illegal immigrants. So basically, the companies that were afraid of perfect competition from other businesses took the easy way out by hiring illegals. So what happened to the businesses that decided to try to play by the rules? A lot of them are already gone or turned to hiring illegals so that they could compete. I won't be crying over businesses that go under because they broke the rules in the first place by hiring illegal immigrants and now that they will have to pay more for labor and raise their prices; the party is over for them. The prices aren't supposed to be controlled by the companies, they are supposed to be controlled by the market and demand. The companies that do illegal things to lower their prices and put other companies out of business would become the only game in town because they are taking on more jobs at lower margins. If nobody elsed hired illegals and that company was the only one around flooded with work, they would simply raise their prices again to the point where they are still kept busy 100% of the time and there is no excess demand for their services at that price. It's really a two way street and a balancing act, the longer that companies are able to hire illegals and drive prices down, the worse the rebound effect will be when something is actually done about it. Also, I'm not exactly how far prices have been driven down because time value has a large effect. It depends on the industry i suppose. It would also depend on whether the companies in that industry are hiring illegals to compete with lower prices or whether they are hiring illegals to save money on labor while charging the same prices and just making more profit.

So yeah Arizona is looking at a huge multiple contraction in their economy if they are able to actually do what this bill is trying to do.

Companies made the decision to conduct their businesses illegaly, they will be the ones harmed. The ones that are legal and paying legal wages will most likely end up better off because they will get some of that business back.

All in hopes of pushing a hard working bunch of people out of the region that in reality they are most indigenist to because of fear.

For some people, it's about whether they are here or not and to others, it's about where they are here or not legally. I'm the latter. I don't care who is in this country, everyone has a right to be here and that's what it's founded upon. But like CrackerJax said, it's whether they come in through the front door or whether they sneak in through the back and begin to destroy the very reason they came here for. They end up destroying the benefit and tax system that a lot of us work hard and by the rules to support. The benefit system works in a cyclical nature and money is payed out that is ideally replenished. Buckets with holes don't hold water even if you keep pouring it in.

But hey really doesn't matter much. The reality of trying to drive out millions of people that so many Americans truly rely on to make their lives better is so daunting of a task that it will not go very far before stuttering out.

The companies rely on them and we rely on the companies that end up hiring them to make more money. In the short run, these companies make more profit. In the long run, they end up back at square one because there is going to be more that one company willing to risk hiring illegals to stay alive and they will be competing with other companies willing to do the same. Companies with only legal employees could compete the same way if they all shared the same higher cost of production. When you talk demand you have to realize that price doesn't shift demand, it only changes the quantity demanded. The demand for the services is still going to be there, but not everyone in town will be able to have their house painted for 20 bucks anymore so a lot of them will decide not to have it done.
You raise a lot of good points, but it's a two way street. IMO it's hard to bring justification to hiring illegal immigrants and cheating the system in the long run because either way the road will lead to perfect competition. One way you will have competition with artificially lower prices and wages where the companies have control on price and the other way you will have competition with market decided prices and minimum wage floors that will allow the tax and social welfare systems to at least remotely work.

Well done though, i think this is actually a good discussion. For once, things haven't boiled down to name calling, purse slapping, and the infamous RIU ridiculing back and forth between political parties! Keep up the good discussion and comments guys!
 

abe23

Active Member
Can someone explain to me why the arizona legislature decided to pass this law rather than a law requiring checks on employers to make sure they aren't hiring people illegally....? Because people being paid under the table is really the problem here, whether they're illegal or not.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
Can someone explain to me why the arizona legislature decided to pass this law rather than a law requiring checks on employers to make sure they aren't hiring people illegally....? Because people being paid under the table is really the problem here, whether they're illegal or not.
I'll tell you why, its an election year and this gets the Tea Bagging conservative base all hard.
 

abe23

Active Member
Well....let us not forget that this is the same AZ legislature that didn't want MLK day as a holiday and passed a law requiring an original birth certificate from anyone running for federal office.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yeah I think they are both economically stupid laws that do no good. If someone wants to come here and contribute to society then they should be welcomed with open arms.



As an American if someone leaves to another country how does that affect me? It means that there is now less competition for goods so that means I can now have more opportunities here at home. If they are more productive here than I am the economy here suffers and the place they moved to gets that added benefit of another productive worker that is needed because otherwise they would not have hired them.

So you cannot answer a SIMPLE question ... you are dismissed for lack of credibility.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
i would say the 67% that voted for it is much more then just the conservative base
Not really, just a conservative state. Dont fortget its the same state that wanted MLK day gone. The state has a "great" history concerning racial issues. We'll see if they stick to their guns as the protests and boycotts mount. Kiss the MLB ALL Star game, Super Bowl, tourism and economic tourism (conventions etc.) all goodbye.
 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member
Not really, just a conservative state. Dont fortget its the same state that wanted MLK day gone. The state has a "great" history concerning racial issues. We'll see if they stick to their guns as the protests and boycotts mount. Kiss the MLB ALL Star game, Super Bowl, tourism and economic tourism (conventions etc.) all goodbye.
spend some time in a border region,before you pass judgment on people who are trying to protect there lives and lively hood from people who by being here are already breaking the law
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
spend some time in a border region,before you pass judgment on people who are trying to protect there lives and lively hood from people who by being here are already breaking the law
I did, spent 2 years living in Forth Worth and did alot of traveling during my stay there; including Arizona, New Mexico and Mexico. If you read my post on the same subject earlier you'd see I wouldn't have a problem w/ a moat and gun towers on the border. Im not pro Illegal Alien or something.
My problem is that it too easily leads to the potential racial profiling of Mexican AMERICANS, i care about them; actual LEGAL citizens. Could not care less about illegals, far as Im concerned they arent citizens and dont have the same rights as you, I and and other legal citizen.

Im all for fixing immigration, its a mess. This is not the way though. As a side note, assuming plenty of LEGAL Mexican American citizens will be pulled over/detained where is the Tea Party? I mean they are so concerned about intrusive government and personal freedom why arent they standing up for Mexican Americans here?
 

abe23

Active Member
Also doesn't this law give irish, russian and other european illegal immigrants a free pass?
 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member
no if stopped by a cop for braking the law if they are obviously foreigners they will have to produce documents , just like with the Mexicans,no different
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
no if stopped by a cop for braking the law if they are obviously foreigners they will have to produce documents , just like with the Mexicans,no different
OK, BUT how do you define "obviously foreigners", as people that have a thick accent, dont speak English well or at all?
 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member
my wife is canadian she has a green card we have carry it as a stipulation and wanting to do the right thing if asked it will be produced , how is that discrimination ,she is not a citizen and as such has to follow cretin rules,
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
my wife is canadian she has a green card we have carry it as a stipulation and wanting to do the right thing if asked it will be produced , how is that discrimination ,she is not a citizen and as such has to follow cretin rules,
that isnt....my problem is when a citizen gets pulled over/detained/questioned because of how he or she looks, dresses or talks.

I believe that there is a probability that Mexican American citizens will be pulled over/detained/questioned because of the color of their skin. That I oppose.
 

slomoking13

Well-Known Member
I did, spent 2 years living in Forth Worth and did alot of traveling during my stay there; including Arizona, New Mexico and Mexico. If you read my post on the same subject earlier you'd see I wouldn't have a problem w/ a moat and gun towers on the border. Im not pro Illegal Alien or something.
My problem is that it too easily leads to the potential racial profiling of Mexican AMERICANS, i care about them; actual LEGAL citizens. Could not care less about illegals, far as Im concerned they arent citizens and dont have the same rights as you, I and and other legal citizen.

Im all for fixing immigration, its a mess. This is not the way though. As a side note, assuming plenty of LEGAL Mexican American citizens will be pulled over/detained where is the Tea Party? I mean they are so concerned about intrusive government and personal freedom why arent they standing up for Mexican Americans here?
Your right, it's not really the way. Arizona was thinking in absolutes when they created it. The law is only really intended to get the government to do something that will superceed it (state law) and control illegal immigration. But until then, the law will stand just, as long as it abides by the outdated federal laws. The days of creating laws that people will follow in good faith are over. It's almost sad in the regards that people are always looking at the loopholes so they can get around things. But on the other hand, it's sad that the government has regulated too much on the peoples' personal freedoms. Hence, the comparison in the legality of illegal immigration and marijuana that someone tried to tie together in context earlier.... which still has me confused and grinning a little bit btw.
 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member
thats not how the law is written, it is a tool to be used after another law is broken , don't forget the high, number of hispanic officers on the force in border states
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top