abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
These are facts in the sense that that is what the "holy books" claim.These are facts?
These are facts in the sense that that is what the "holy books" claim.These are facts?
But that right there perfectly captures the frustration that some feel when perusing holy texts ... circularity. From a rationalist's perspective, there is no good in believing in a book because the book certifies its own truthfulness. So for most Christians (or other Abrahamic believers) there must be something more, external to text, that supports the belief. For some, it is a personal mystical experience. For others, it's accession to social/cultural pressure, simply having gone to church/mosque/etc. all of one's life and being comfy with it. For others yet ... other yet. Bottom line ... it is invariably something that isn't communicable to a hypothetical rationalist's satisfaction. When I see the word "fact" I assume and ultimately require the process by which it was verified. In its way it is a stricter term than "truth".These are facts in the sense that that is what the "holy books" claim.
I agree thoroughly. I think one of my first exposures to it was a bumper sticker meme that actually hit me pretty hard. "God exists because the book says so, the book can't be false because God wrote it."But that right there perfectly captures the frustration that some feel when perusing holy texts ... circularity. From a rationalist's perspective, there is no good in believing in a book because the book certifies its own truthfulness. So for most Christians (or other Abrahamic believers) there must be something more, external to text, that supports the belief. For some, it is a personal mystical experience. For others, it's accession to social/cultural pressure, simply having gone to church/mosque/etc. all of one's life and being comfy with it. For others yet ... other yet. Bottom line ... it is invariably something that isn't communicable to a hypothetical rationalist's satisfaction. When I see the word "fact" I assume and ultimately require the process by which it was verified. In its way it is a stricter term than "truth".
Impasse. cn
There are actually a couple reasons for this circularity. I think a lot of stress comes from not differentiating them.But that right there perfectly captures the frustration that some feel when perusing holy texts ... circularity. From a rationalist's perspective, there is no good in believing in a book because the book certifies its own truthfulness. So for most Christians (or other Abrahamic believers) there must be something more, external to text, that supports the belief. For some, it is a personal mystical experience. For others, it's accession to social/cultural pressure, simply having gone to church/mosque/etc. all of one's life and being comfy with it. For others yet ... other yet. Bottom line ... it is invariably something that isn't communicable to a hypothetical rationalist's satisfaction. When I see the word "fact" I assume and ultimately require the process by which it was verified. In its way it is a stricter term than "truth".
Impasse. cn
Who created God?I know God is real because I am alive.
I did, sorryWho created God?
And you think a sorry will suffice?I did, sorry
Sadly, sorry isn't enough, I know. As a way to mitigate my foolishness I have been working with confused Catholic school girls for the last few weeks and I will continue providing them justice, the old fashioned way, until someone catches me. I have thrown 7 Hail Mary's and I drank 5 Our Fathers to try to make amends for my mistake. I know that this isn't enough but I am trying.And you think a sorry will suffice?
Universal Life Church? That's the one you do online so you can marry your buddy and his wife on the cheap, right? My friend did that at one point.All I see is a bunch of God-bashing, monkey-metamorphisis, space alien, crazy-ass beliefs, on here, and being a minister of the Universal Life Church, I'm almost tempted to roll up shop and go elsewhere... Just wondering... Little bit of a check here.... I am tolerant of anyones beliefs, but there is a great in-tolerance of anything Christian I ever say when people talk about their far-fetched, man-made, dreamed up concoctions of science and sci-fi, and whatever... Whatever happenned to just believing that Christ died for our sins, and that God created everything, including cannabis, which is clearly pointed out, and spoken HIGHLY of many times in The Bible? Anyone? Seriously, anyone?
My grandma knows God isn't real because she is dead.I know God is real because I am alive.
Absurdist.^ atheist?
Absurdist.
...and yet we're asked to describe that God - sometimes we can't. Does that rend discussion futile? I don't see why it would. Some people are flighty and some people are in danger of painting everything around them stark white.The sort of God an atheist doubts has a pretty clear definition.
Why should an RIU member or any cannabis user or afficianado be automatically condemned to Hell? God gave us cannabis, it is his noble herb. Too say that any Christian that uses cannabis is damned, is to say that there is an inherrant evil in the use of the herb ala Harry Anslinger. I have very personal Christian beliefs, I do not attempt to proslatize any other person to my faith. I am assuming you are not involved with a God of your understanding and that is your perogative. But since that is true, how can you claim anyone else is certainly going to a place that in the philosophy of most posters here does not even exist?Fairly certain that if you're a Christian, AND you're on RIU, you're going to hell. . . . . . if you believe in Christianity. .... . . interesting. I've got no hate for you though. Just don't push it on me. Keep it green. Keep it happy.
Isn't this a perfect time to mention Scientology?
BTW, just so we understand each other...you mean the cloying religious, force fed, hell and damnation sort?
Not the, that's amazing and no way can I truely describe it, sort, right?
The sort of God an atheist doubts has a pretty clear definition.
...and yet we're asked to describe that God - sometimes we can't. Does that rend discussion futile? I don't see why it would. Some people are flighty and some people are in danger of painting everything around them stark white.
Eggshell.