Andrew Yang

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
HashBucket said:
I do. It's because as soon as they open their mouth some asshole in the crowd starts yelling "RACIST - CHILD MOLESTER - RACIST, RACIST - ORANGE - OBSTRUCTION - RUSSIA - RACIST"


Don't worry, capitalism with resolve that.
Nature does not like a vacuum.

If you can see it, some dumb Republican can, and they'll move out of the failed socialist experiment called California, and move to Oklahoma - if that is in their best interest.
Click to expand...
Don’t you support the guy who bragged about creeping in on unsuspecting naked underage children though?

Btw, I think your ignore button is broken, trashbucket

pedolover
 
H

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Don’t you support the guy who bragged about creeping in on unsuspecting naked underage children though?

Btw, I think your ignore button is broken, trashbucket

pedolover
Click to expand...
I unignored you my friend.
I decided that it was kind of an act of cowardice ... and I'm not a coward.
Besides that, all America loving citizens have to pay a lot of attention to you and your kind.
We need to watch, and be aware of what you're thinking and saying. As long as you limit it to 'thinking and saying' we gonna be ok.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
HashBucket said:
I unignored you my friend.
I decided that it was kind of an act of cowardice ... and I'm not a coward.
Besides that, all America loving citizens have to pay a lot of attention to you and your kind.
We need to watch, and be aware of what you're thinking and saying. As long as you limit it to 'thinking and saying' we gonna be ok.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke
Click to expand...
Give yourself credit, you’re a total coward, trashbucket

And a pedolover
 
H

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
Andy is moving up in the polls.
Its too bad that Hillary's and Nancy's party has already decided that he won't get a shot.
 
H

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
No he isnt
Click to expand...
Why do you think that the party and CNN has decided that he shouldn't get a shot?
It's kind of like what they did with Bernie when they screwed him to keep Hillary - big mistake.
He could have beat Trump.

This time Unc ... try for more than ten words ... try it.
Think; come up with a reason why Nancy is holding the impeachment.
Think - it will hurt. It will take some time.
But ... think about it. Why?

(PREDICTION: He's going to say ... "drunk racist" as a reply.")
 
H

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"Bernie would have won!"

So says the trumptard who harvests plants at six weeks...
Click to expand...
Yep.
So says a trumtard that harvests plants at six weeks .. no, wait ... four weeks.
So what?
** Looking at the title of this thread **
So what?

Deflection, by definition, is a method of changing the course of an object, an emotion or thought from its original source. Psychological deflection is seen as a narcissistic abuse tactic used to control the mind and emotions of others.

Deflection is an intense focus upon and antagonism toward the legitimacy of the actions, feelings, and beliefs of others; and an intense misdirection of attention away from the primary aggressor's actions.

When you deflect, you throw someone or something off course, often by using a distraction. Another way to deflect something — such as criticism — is to blame someone else. Eventually the truth, like the cat who quickly sees there's nothing unusual up in the sky, catches up with those who deflect.

Jean Kim, M.D
Psycology Today
January 2015
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
HashBucket said:
Yep.
So says a trumtard that harvests plants at six weeks .. no, wait ... four weeks.
So what?
** Looking at the title of this thread **
So what?

Deflection, by definition, is a method of changing the course of an object, an emotion or thought from its original source. Psychological deflection is seen as a narcissistic abuse tactic used to control the mind and emotions of others.

Deflection is an intense focus upon and antagonism toward the legitimacy of the actions, feelings, and beliefs of others; and an intense misdirection of attention away from the primary aggressor's actions.

When you deflect, you throw someone or something off course, often by using a distraction. Another way to deflect something — such as criticism — is to blame someone else. Eventually the truth, like the cat who quickly sees there's nothing unusual up in the sky, catches up with those who deflect.

Jean Kim, M.D
Psycology Today
January 2015
Click to expand...
Tldr.

I already knew that you are dumb (tired) even before I saw that thread. Racism is correlated negatively with cognitive function as has been scientifically proven.
 
Communist Dreamer

Communist Dreamer

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
That's not peer reviewed. You're also not smart, nazi buddha.
Click to expand...
OMFG it wasn't peer review!

Below is peer review on peer review. The results are shocking!


But does peer review `work' at all? A systematic review of all the available evidence on peer review concluded that `the practice of peer review is based on faith in its effects, rather than on facts'

THE DEFECTS OF PEER REVIEW
So we have little evidence on the effectiveness of peer review, but we have considerable evidence on its defects. In addition to being poor at detecting gross defects and almost useless for detecting fraud it is slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, something of a lottery, prone to bias, and easily abused.

 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
HashBucket said:
Why do you think that the party and CNN has decided that he shouldn't get a shot?
It's kind of like what they did with Bernie when they screwed him to keep Hillary - big mistake.
He could have beat Trump.

This time Unc ... try for more than ten words ... try it.
Think; come up with a reason why Nancy is holding the impeachment.
Think - it will hurt. It will take some time.
But ... think about it. Why?

(PREDICTION: He's going to say ... "drunk racist" as a reply.")
Click to expand...
you said yang was moving up in the polls

he isnt

you lied

all you do is lie
 
Communist Dreamer

Communist Dreamer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you said yang was moving up in the polls

he isnt

you lied

all you do is lie
Click to expand...
I don't know. People are really stupid. Maybe next time the really stupid hicks from the southern states who stole your Shillary presidency will vote for the Andy, since he practically runs on Trump's lies of being for the dumbest of the dumb blue collar worker too.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Communist Dreamer said:
OMFG it wasn't peer review!

Below is peer review on peer review. The results are shocking!


But does peer review `work' at all? A systematic review of all the available evidence on peer review concluded that `the practice of peer review is based on faith in its effects, rather than on facts'

THE DEFECTS OF PEER REVIEW
So we have little evidence on the effectiveness of peer review, but we have considerable evidence on its defects. In addition to being poor at detecting gross defects and almost useless for detecting fraud it is slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, something of a lottery, prone to bias, and easily abused.

Click to expand...
No, the peer review process is fine and I'm not the least bit interested in your pseudoscience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top