All the news that isn't

Status
Not open for further replies.

choomer

Well-Known Member
In a classic move of someone (or something) that has lost all credibility, WaPo is covering the "scientific" evidence of Russia influencing the election using "fake" news outlets identified below to do what pretty much amounts to, "Hey! Look over there!" in an attempt to smear non-MSM news outlets of misrepresenting the news as they have been PROVEN to do.

You may use this list for its intended purpose of avoiding all these "fake news" sites (and with 200+ it's most assured that @ least one IS as bad as WaPo, just not as widely read) or you might be inclined to look at some of the sites on this list that you have never even heard of before to see what this "fake news" is.

Whether it's the former or the latter, by now you should know that any information pushed at you from any media outlet these days needs a good bit of verification.

Now, on to the list!:

"The report from PropOrNot, provided to the Post, identifies more than 200 websites that routinely pushed Russian propaganda to at least 15 million Americans, and found that false stories pushed on Facebook were viewed more than 213 million times. You may be surprised by some of the sites on the list (it seems even satirical fakes news sites are propagandists too)..."



EDIT: Seems Glen Greenwald isn't that impressed w/ the list either:

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 6h6 hours ago

Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Max Blumenthal
Not only is it disgusting how they smear these sites w/no evidence; worse is that they do it while hiding their identity. Great job, WPost:

Glenn Greenwald added,
Max Blumenthal @MaxBlumenthal
Actual blacklist of sites that supposedly "echo Russian propaganda" includes @blkagendareport and @truthout http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html?m=1…


Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 6h6 hours ago

Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Trevor Timm

Funniest part: the ones who spread this thought they were exposing "fake news" when they themselves were exhibiting all the hallmarks of it.

Glenn Greenwald added,
Trevor Timm @trevortimm
Embarrassing how many reporters breathlessly tweeted this without clicking through to the really shady site featured https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-propaganda-effort-helped-spread-fake-news-during-election-experts-say/2016/11/24/793903b6-8a40-4ca9-b712-716af66098fe_story.html…
0 replies 163 retweets 242 likes

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 9h9 hours ago
WPost's anon source: this isn't McCarthyism! We just want FBI to investigate US news orgs for pro-Russia espionage http://www.propornot.com/p/frequently-asked-questions.html…


Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 7h7 hours ago
Glenn Greenwald Retweeted PropOrNot ID Service
These are the anonymous cowards who produced a blacklist accusing US media orgs of being Russian tools, that WPost heralded & protected:

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 7h7 hours ago
That WPost story on Russian fake news is total journalistic garbage, but it serves various agendas so it's being uncritically passed around.
0 replies 286 retweets 393 likes

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald 7h7 hours ago
Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Atomic Harbour
Right: in contrast to the WashPost, which deceived everyone about Saddam's non-existent WMDs & AQ ties & suggested Putin poisoned Hillary.

Glenn Greenwald added,
Atomic Harbour @AtomicHarbour

  1. @ggreenwald I like how Wikileaks is fake news. None of the docs they have published have ever been shown to be fake.
    0 replies 222 retweets 348 likes
 
Last edited:

choomer

Well-Known Member
It took 25 min. for the Blue Cuck Crew to start posting pics of their prom dates again (who may actually be life partners now)?

You guys are slippin'.
 
Last edited:

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
TOP DEFINITION

choomer

A person - usually male - who partakes in physical bonding by such means as cuddling, touching or mock-wrestling. Such actions are jocular and often done in high spirits, such as after a few drinks or in the sports changing rooms.
"That Tim is a real choomer - he keeps cuddling me."

choomer
A person who is involved with the act of chooming. A child-man who remains in an adolescent state where physical touching is neither adult nor child. Choomers rely on masculine physical touching (pawing) to demonstrate their feelings. This physical touching becomes their distinctive display of self.

5804238318_8c526f9e0d-450x314.jpg

(Is this JIMMY DURANTE?!)
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Glad you're having more fun than when you played cards and dominoes on pizza and pasta at a Podesta sleep over.

Don't forget the walnut sauce!
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
^^^^^pedophile
Speaking of, dunno if you caught the news today, but panhead/enema was just snagged in an ongoing sting operation - truth!

(Is there anything not repellent about this 'person'? For real? Wooooof. Sniffling, ticking, tweaking worm.)
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
rob roy refuses to state that it should be illegal for an adult to have sex with a 10 year old child.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
rob roy won't even deny it. he doesn't think it should be illegal for adults to have sex with 10 year old children.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
rob roy refuses to state that it should be illegal for an adult to have sex with a 10 year old child.

I'm curious about your innuendo, Poopy Pants.

You seem to conflate my rejection of the prevailing form of government with your false accusation against me of "pedo" .

A person could believe the present legal system to be illegitimate, while still disavowing some of the same things which the present legal system "make illegal" right ?

For instance, while both the present legal system and I agree, that shitting on another persons floor is "wrong", I don't think the only avenue for restitution for the victimized property owner must be thru the present legal system. Nor are all things which ARE legal, morally sound or illegal, immoral.

If you extrapolated my sentence (directly above) you would necessarily conclude that you have presented a losing argument. (again)
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
I'm curious about your innuendo, Poopy Pants.

You seem to conflate my rejection of the prevailing form of government with your false accusation against me of "pedo" .

A person could believe the present legal system to be illegitimate, while still disavowing some of the same things which the present legal system "make illegal" right ?

For instance, while both the present legal system and I agree, that shitting on another persons floor is "wrong", I don't think the only avenue for restitution for the victimized property owner must be thru the present legal system. Nor are all things which ARE legal, morally sound or illegal, immoral.

If you extrapolated my sentence (directly above) you would necessarily conclude that you have presented a losing argument. (again)
In your opinion, can a child consent to sex with an adult?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top