^^^ You contradict yourself Med Man. You declare greed as the problem, yet you insist "forcing" people to do things holds the answer.
He's not the only one. Not by a long shot. That, unfortunately, is the rub.
Local control is a much better and cost effective answer, than the one size fit all federal control.
Agreed. The most "local" control there is being individual peaceful self ownership, which I fully endorse.
Here again is the mantra of the haves. Take a kid in the ghetto, do you think he is thrilled with his individual peaceful ownership, and I might ask ownership of what. It is easy to sit back and say, "just leave me alone" when you have all you need. When you start with such a burden as poor people start with, the ownership question must come up as, of what.
Interesting ideas I see reading through the conversation here. You know what they say about opinions, but IMO the biggest problem facing us here in the United States (biggest problem internally at least) is the illusion of democracy that we operate under. How can we call ourselves a democracy when we are, in fact, dominated by a dictatorship just 2 parties? The Democratic party and the Republican party are nearly identical when one really looks at it - for example, we debate cutting taxes vs raising taxes, but the fundamental question of if we should have taxes (and the system by which we should collect them) remains the same. Yet, for longer than any of us can remember, we have blindly voted these two same parties in. Over and over.
Hello TimD420, welcome to this forum. I'll agree with you both parties are similar in that they want to take what is rightfully yours to further their agendas.
As far as being a democracy, I don't think that was part of the original formula for governance. It was supposed to be
a Constitutional Republic to protect individual rights FROM the failures of pure Democracy, where 2 wolves could decide to have the sheep for supper. I'll agree with you again, there are many fundamental questions that get obfuscated by the illusion of "choice" offered by the political process, taxes being a good example. Picking your poison, is not much of a choice, yet the present system persists because most people suffer from the illusion that self governance could never work. Who sells that illusion the hardest? Why government of course. Go figure.
Hi Rob, and thanks.Hello TimD420, welcome to this forum. I'll agree with you both parties are similar in that they want to take what is rightfully yours to further their agendas.
As far as being a democracy, I don't think that was part of the original formula for governance. It was supposed to be
a Constitutional Republic to protect individual rights FROM the failures of pure Democracy, where 2 wolves could decide to have the sheep for supper. I'll agree with you again, there are many fundamental questions that get obfuscated by the illusion of "choice" offered by the political process, taxes being a good example. Picking your poison, is not much of a choice, yet the present system persists because most people suffer from the illusion that self governance could never work. Who sells that illusion the hardest? Why government of course. Go figure.
Med, i will go along with most of it, but not the class warfare crap you spew. You are suggesting i pay even more in to a system that i know i will never see a dime from, come on.
My utopia is true equality, not the liberal definition that enslaves people, but the equality that was the vision of our founders. The goverment should not be robbing us every year of the money that we bust our ass for. Everyone should pay the same, no deductions, just the same exact rate. Its the truly fair thing, no prefrence to anyone. The only people that this class warfare is helping is the people that instigate it, makes them wealthy.
No offense, but none really seem plausible and some are just downright out of our control (China currency and US companies off-shore moving back on shore).
Med, i will go along with most of it, but not the class warfare crap you spew.
Why is it class warfare to expect the government to act in the best interests of the American people, but not class warfare when people are demanding tax cuts for billionaires? Why isn't it class warfare when the wealth of the country is being transfered out of the hands of the people into the hands of the wealthy?
War has two sides. Not one. If there is class warfare going on in this country the top 1% of Americans are winning it and everyone else is losing badly.