mastakoosh
Well-Known Member
new competition on RIU. winners every day, step right up and be the first..........to beat this DEAD HORSE.
Okay I will .... and until you can prove the 105 year old publication is creditable on this ... you and PM can shut your piehole ... ha ha ha ha ha ....
Man ... there are tons of info on it ... big subject ... here is WRH version ... he provides lots of links to back his info ....someone please show me how the towers should have fallen. please.
Well I think the fact that they have been around for 105 years might be a clue.....
Man ... there are tons of info on it ... big subject ... here is WRH version ... he provides lots of links to back his info ....
The 9/11 WTC Fires: Where's the Inferno?
If you do a serious investigation of 911 you will come to the conclusion something rotten when on within the government on that day.
the point it...they should never have fallen. fire cannot cause a steel building to collapse. it's just pesky physics, man.someone please show me how the towers should have fallen. please.
i don't know what this 105 year old book is, but the bible has been around for 4,000 and it's about as credible as politacally motivated as the official 9/11 report.Well I think the fact that they have been around for 105 years might be a clue.....
what about the impact with a huge f*cking plane?the point it...they should never have fallen. fire cannot cause a steel building to collapse. it's just pesky physics, man.
so.............now..........
The building didnt melt a 175000 pound airplane knocked out its central support structure. Then 11 floors of concrete steel and glass fell in on itself which caused the 95 floors that were undamged to continue to colapse.the point it...they should never have fallen. fire cannot cause a steel building to collapse. it's just pesky physics, man.
Wow what crazy logic ... to think a building design to withstand what happen can come down like it did ... the way the building came down proves it was expolsive demolision. ... If you think the official story makes sense then you are one of the fools ...The building didnt melt a 175000 pound airplane knocked out its central support structure. Then 11 floors of concrete steel and glass fell in on itself which caused the 95 floors that were undamged to continue to colapse.
Makes a hell of a lot more sense than hundreds of workers brought thousands of pounds of explosives into said building then cut concrete and steel support posts over 95 floors to demolish the buildings.
so.............now..........
....and then we ...... work .... as ..... a ..... responsible .... people ..... and ..... bring .... these ..... war ..... criminals .... to ..... justice ....and then we..............
Wow what crazy logic ... to think a building design to withstand what happen can come down like it did ... the way the building came down proves it was expolsive demolision. ... If you think the official story makes sense then you are one of the fools ...
Well, the fact that fire can't melt steel is provable, the fact that Larry Silverstein admitted to pulling building 7 is provable, the fact that piroclastic clouds are only present during volcanos and controlled demos is provable, the fact that multiple eyewitness acounts reported "multiple explosions" is provable, the fact that a 140 plus story building that fell in freefall speed and was pulvarised into dust is provable...need I go on?I believe they (Bush Regime) are capable of it, I just find it rather hard to believe they could have pulled this off without a fuck up and some exposure by any of the players. Some of the conspiracy theories are believable, but so far, un-provable. The two that most intrigue me are the Pentagon and that Bldg#7 at WTC. They both look suspicious.
Well, the fact that fire can't melt steel is provable, the fact that Larry Silverstein admitted to pulling building 7 is provable, the fact that piroclastic clouds are only present during volcanos and controlled demos is provable, the fact that multiple eyewitness acounts reported "multiple explosions" is provable, the fact that a 140 plus story building that fell in freefall speed and was pulvarised into dust is provable...need I go on?
so ...... now .... investigate ...... then ....... speak ...... out .....