Search results

And one other thing, Fred Rogers (who my folks KNEW) has nothing to do with the bonafide relationship or the Goodwin ruling. STAY ON TOPIC.

This is a problem with folks on the thread that have the biggest mouths. Let them know something they said was wrong, and they still insist they are right. Ok Pecker- Fred Rogers was in HIGH SCHOOL during ww2. He never served in the military. He never was a sniper, and you never saw it on...

You asked, I answered, sorry it wasn't good enough for you. I think folks should be able to brew their own beer, that doesn't mean they should do it by the tanker truck and sell it with no regulation.

While I don't necessarily agree with your ideas, we both seem to agree that those that seize it should NOT get it.

I believe in full legalization. I think that anything that is consumed commercially (i.e. sold in a store) should have some purity standards, and I don't think folks should go to jail for personal amounts, nor should they be arrested or hassled. I don't think children should just have free...

The problem we see is that they can take away funding, but until civil forfeiture is gone the drug warriors can fund themselves on the backs of marijuana. I've publicly proposed that all drug forfeiture money be turned over to schools to fund band, arts, and sports. This can be done with...

http://drbobcertifications.com/uncategorized/physician-response-dangers-decriminalizing-marijuana/ That is an article I wrote for the Morning Sun in Mt. Pleasant around a year ago in response to some BS a 'Drug Task Force' detective put up about the 'dangers' of decriminalization. I think it...

You are right, there is a small group of 'bored dickheads' in here that love to harass. I think I've posted enough facts to support everything I've ever said in here. The article from the LSJ back in 2011 clearly shows I am for legalization, along with my recent support of those efforts with...

funny...lol always the same players. How is our friend Joe doing now a days? And who is your favorite clinic? Betcha I can guess.

Kumar at Greenlite? He is good, and that is an affiliated clinic of ours. We refer folks there as we don't have any in SE Michigan.

Why on earth would anyone talk about section 8 defenses that hadn't actually been involved in one? Yes, I've been challenged before, but they only try it once. I'm a recognized expert on the subject, and known for doing things right. But every now and then they try.... But mostly I am...

We have to remember the entire point of this post was to bring attention to the ruling so patients can protect themselves. Unfortunately some folks tried to disrupt it, but the ruling is reality and it is the way it will be until and if the SC overrules it. I strongly doubt that will happen...

I would agree, but given the choice, do you want to see Proctor or someone like me for your cert, even if the risk of running afoul of the courts is low?

No, they won't look for his patients, but they will apply this standard on any patient they get their hands on, it is a COA ruling and statewide after all. You just have to be aware of what the ruling says, anticipate how they will try to use it, and counter it. Your defense starts with your...

Well you have to know their game. And you have to have the background to beat them at it. One of the reasons I've never had a cert overturned and have never had to go back to the same county twice...lol Prosecutors don't like to lose cases. Dr. Bob

I don't think so. Dan is a very good attorney. It seems the trial court may have determined Tuttle was the controlling ruling. I've always maintained Tuttle isn't that important because it was so limited in scope (time frame).

I would tend to agree. That is where a proper certification comes in handy as well, if you get caught with more than you are allowed in section 4. Now 450gms is less than 17ounces. We can work with that in our clinic, and I can help as an expert witness. First of all, what was the actual...

BTW, I'm going to put you on ignore until you learn to properly address me. I have told you I find 'pot doc' offensive. If anyone here feels one of your questions is important enough to answer, they can ask it.

I have for years, even in private practice... It is good to do and makes sure the patient is protected in the VERY unlikely event a homebound patient is called into court over a cert. But there is a chance, so off I go.

Please review the act, it says doctor has assessed (which includes a face to face meeting) the CURRENT condition. There is a reason people have to come in every two years, it is because they need to be personally reassessed. There is NO time a through the mail renewal would be considered adequate.