Search results

cash for clunkers was done way too prematurely and for the wrong reason...AND stupidly. the concept of government incentives for new vehicles is something they should have waited until the impending conversion to alternate fuel, to justify the cost. that would not only impact the arguable...

but what of checks and balances? the whole structure of our government was conceived to avoid this consolodation of power by one brach, let alone one man. exactly. thats exactly why no branch of government can be left to account for themselves. to allow all that power under the protective...

no i admitted to being mistaken on one point. that doesn't prove that liberals are evil liars as you intend to spin this into, as a means of discrediting anyone who disagrees with you on the topic. not that you won't try....

are we debating which one polished the most knobs in hollywood?

*sigh* i'm not going to go on an internet expedition and dig up all instances were left activist groups were put on the watch list. fine, here's one....which never happened....because i'm a liar. "Political author's name matches terror watch list."...

i don't trust a politician with that kind of power, thats the problem. you supported the handing of all that unchecked power to the executive branch. not just bush. our most basic right of habeas corpus was even rendered conditional with the military commissions act of 2006. you are...

well i guess i have to drop an overused term: those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

"if you've done no wrong, you have nothing to hide", the public banner of any well marketed police-state. protestors and activists groups were placed on the terror watch list. bush gave the executive branch unchecked authority to take away your rights if it saw fit, send you to a foreign...

isn't that also the definition of 'incompetent'?

ok but just realize you're simultaneously expressing support for one president who compromised our constitutional rights, and damning another because you think he's going to. that to me is "drinking the koolaid" as the term is overused for dramatic effect.

i have not seen any signs that we would have another 'rubber stamp' house/congress majority like bush did, forcing the majority into a constant state of submission with looming threats of mushroom clouds and smallpox. progressives have been a thorn in obama's side in fact over health care...

the government is of the people, by the people, and for the people. therefore an attack on it is an attack on the people, our sovereignty, and our constitution which every member of government is sworn to defend. like it or not, our leaders are democratically elected which means that the...

i never implied that the constitution represented the creation of our rights. it is a legal documention of our inalienable/human rights for the government to adhere to, [rights with no further need for a legal process to validate them, which is the bill of rights' very purpose]. this...

i think meth use would be of a much lower percentage among junkies, since its mostly popular in places where other substances are scarcely available. not trying to argue a side, just presenting a theory.

it will lead to the passing of laws which will chip away our freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and freedom to own firearms. civil war is not a right, its giving the government the right to defend itself. imagine our past policy in iraq, but in america. quick question: where was...

it places limitations on government to protect our right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (aka inalienable right/human right/you know i'm right). example: the government is not allowed to take away our free speech, thus we have the right to free speech.

i'm not defending the addict, as they are responsible for their own predicaments. however apart from being annoying and stealing things, they tend to not be terroristic murderers. i can't logically weigh my busted window and stolen radio to a child with a bullet through their head because...

yeah i was actually referring to the theme of this post: whomever that person is, i can assure you that society would benefit greatly if they choked on a chicken bone.

because i'm against destroying lives for superficial reward? no i'm not pure but i at least strive to not be the type of person who would benefit society by dying.

nothing. isnt it spectacular?