Doer
Well-Known Member
No. You are being a sociopath. Just tap dance.
Go back and read your bullshit. See what you did.
Have you enrolled in AHCA and what was your experience?
- Thread starter althor
- Start date
Go back and read your bullshit. See what you did.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Oh sure, you big fat liar. Why do I bitch? Only at guys in your special club. Head up ass.
I'll tell ya what Doer, you answer my initial question, in return I will gladly answer yours.
It can't get any more reasonable than this.
Doer
Well-Known Member
OK. Let us see.
Is there any govt, political system etc, that has done better with the masses? (Not exact. Good enough?)
No system has done better at this so far, than any other, in my opinion.
That was my only point until you started personal attacks. That I guarantee, you would never get away with, to my face.
You began Stupidity, because you pretended not understand my answer. And you are a coward with those comments about liberal arts and no pussy for years. You hide in forum. Just immature lashing out.
And is anyone supporting you on this? No. We see sour grapes. We see you can't stand the heat.
And we all know you have no experience on these subjects, so, you provide no content beyond spew.
Ok, I still believe you are dodging my question.
Your answer concludes that you cannot distinguish the difference between, communism, socialism (any type) or capitalism of any type.
Is that right?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't praise sigs often. Props. While everyone is focused on O'care, something is going on.
TPP
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Buck, those are horrible, I thought you were a better grower than that, ever heard of nitrogen?
i love you beenthere.
You are going to argue on the basis of cost? Wouldn't it be much cheaper to just have government eliminate the infirm? That would leave a job opening for someone without a disease which would create even a better living standard for the rest of us. Population growth is a huge problem that causes all sorts of nasty effects. Wouldn't eliminating lives already in the shitter be better for everyone?
Now that you bring up the basis of cost it all makes sense now.
Dude, this only proves your knowledge of cannabis is quite limited.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Wow...deep comprehension, this is not. How does it take you this long?
Correct as you knew, days ago.
So I answered. Let's see if you can be reasonable or not. Can you admit to the level of experience you have in this life, or not?
Doer
Well-Known Member
You are dimmed to simply ironic joking, as well. Nothing personal.
And why would I dodge your baby question?
You simply failed to allow me my answer.
I dont think so. I think he understood quite well and answered quite appropriately.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No, actually your picture proves you grow sickly yellow moldy weed.
I normally try not to get involved in thread derailment, but since I started the thread and it has been derailed the entire time....
I don't know how you can see mold on those buds. If that is the case, well then, I can't see it myself but my eyes aren't what they used to be...
As far as yellowing...
I believe in the very old saying "jack of all trades, master of none".
A good botanist can grow good tomatoes, peaches, oranges, azaelas, cannabis, tulips, shrubs, etc.etc.etc.
and each and everyone of them would be good.
A specialty grower, in this case cannabis, will tweak his grows specifically for cannabis.
While this doesn't apply to all the other stuff that a botanist can grow well, it does for cannabis.
I know this is the politics section and facts generally do not apply or actually convert the debaters, but....
Higher nitrogen levels at the end of flowering results in lower thc levels. That is a fact, scientifically proven.
When you get to a certain stage of growing, which isn't really difficult, you will not make leaps and bounds improvements. You are already past that point. At that stage the only way to improve is to make small tweaks which make even smaller improvements. But those small tweaks keep adding up until you actually can tell a small but discernable difference.
Feel free to confirm what I have said. There are studies.
Higher the nitrogen level at the end of flowering, the lower the THC levels.
These studies were done in a way to LOWER thc levels in hemp, so if you are growing hemp you would want HIGH nitrogen levels to lower the thc percentage and increase stem growth.
So in conclusion, if your leaves aren't yellowing at the end of flower, you can improve your overall bud quality. Unless you are growing hemp for the stems.
I don't know how you can see mold on those buds. If that is the case, well then, I can't see it myself but my eyes aren't what they used to be...
As far as yellowing...
I believe in the very old saying "jack of all trades, master of none".
A good botanist can grow good tomatoes, peaches, oranges, azaelas, cannabis, tulips, shrubs, etc.etc.etc.
and each and everyone of them would be good.
A specialty grower, in this case cannabis, will tweak his grows specifically for cannabis.
While this doesn't apply to all the other stuff that a botanist can grow well, it does for cannabis.
I know this is the politics section and facts generally do not apply or actually convert the debaters, but....
Higher nitrogen levels at the end of flowering results in lower thc levels. That is a fact, scientifically proven.
When you get to a certain stage of growing, which isn't really difficult, you will not make leaps and bounds improvements. You are already past that point. At that stage the only way to improve is to make small tweaks which make even smaller improvements. But those small tweaks keep adding up until you actually can tell a small but discernable difference.
Feel free to confirm what I have said. There are studies.
Higher the nitrogen level at the end of flowering, the lower the THC levels.
These studies were done in a way to LOWER thc levels in hemp, so if you are growing hemp you would want HIGH nitrogen levels to lower the thc percentage and increase stem growth.
So in conclusion, if your leaves aren't yellowing at the end of flower, you can improve your overall bud quality. Unless you are growing hemp for the stems.
On the contrary my friend.
The plant in that old picture is from the early 1980's 1981-1982 to be more precise, grown by myself in Mendo county.
They were the original skunk strain. there were only a handful of people that had the privilege to even get their hands on them and I was fortunate enough to have an older brother with that connection.
You ask anyone that is old enough to remember what kind of weed was available back then, this was the creme de la cream in that era.
And there is not a bit of mold on those plants and it certainly has nothing to do with nitrogen deficiency.
So many youngsters these days think all cannabis should look like the simple to grow deep green indica dominant hybrids their used to.
Like i said, your ignorant comment proves your limited knowledge.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
yeah, you grow sickly yellow moldy weed
I've tried to make this point to some of these rookie know it all's many times.
The plant in the picture had a dominate sativa gene and produced less chlorophyll.
Back then our nutrient were very limited compared to today, but still to this day I back off nitrogen early in the flowering stage for the very reason you stated.
Doer
Well-Known Member
So, you don't cut back nitrogen for blooming?
Doer
Well-Known Member
So, fake reasonable as we well knew.
Doer
Well-Known Member
So, athos, this reply, says he did not realize the ironic joking about the idea of withholding Nitrogen for bloom.
Or if ABC was in error a simple correction is appropriate for any non-shitty person, not prone to knee jerk put down.