JMD's #2 Indoor grow (hydroponic)

Slipon

Well-Known Member
look much better too day, guess it like the PH and food

remember to keep a journal of some kind, nice to have if you got anything near my kind of memory, can really come in handy later on
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
Excited to see how you are going to arrange the chips:mrgreen:
You mean the Cree boards? :)


look much better too day, guess it like the PH and food

remember to keep a journal of some kind, nice to have if you got anything near my kind of memory, can really come in handy later on
Yep, seems to be a great increase in growth. My journal will be here, for everyone to read and learn from (good or bad).
 

Slipon

Well-Known Member
is them Cree Chips all 2700K ?

also exited on how you will space em out, are they on 50W each ? if thats 800 actual watt I would like to grow atleast 4 big size plants under em or even 8 small and atleast use 120x120cm space, will you angle em on the panel or make the panel big enough ? if I should build em I think I might choose to build 4 lights with 4 chips in each, so I could spread em out a bit, use one at each plant etc, could even grow some in between if you space em so they overlap a bit, and also give you the option to just run one over your seedling and if you plan to continue to grow autos I would aim for 12 under 800W but thats just me

look good, Im subbed
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
is them Cree Chips all 2700K ?

also exited on how you will space em out, are they on 50W each ? if thats 800 actual watt I would like to grow atleast 4 big size plants under em or even 8 small and atleast use 120x120cm space, will you angle em on the panel or make the panel big enough ? if I should build em I think I might choose to build 4 lights with 4 chips in each, so I could spread em out a bit, use one at each plant etc, could even grow some in between if you space em so they overlap a bit, and also give you the option to just run one over your seedling and if you plan to continue to grow autos I would aim for 12 under 800W but thats just me

look good, Im subbed
All of them are XPGWHT-L1-0000-00EE7. Each module is 50W, so yes, 800W total :)
The initial idea was a lamp that was 50x50cm, but I'm thinking of making four individual lamps instead. There's just something about making a single 800W lamp!

Right now I'm in the process of making the drivers myself.



Update on the grow:

I just re-tested the water, and it showed a PH of 8.8.. no idea why it changed that much in that short time. Dumped it to PH 5.5. Water showed 1800 PPM.
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
nutrients, like most things are not created equal

1800ppm of yourn might be equal to 1100 of mine. I have yet to go over 1100ppms, and only do that just prior to buds peaking
 

Slipon

Well-Known Member
yea I understand, a 800W light would rock, specially when its a DIY of quality parts

but IMO a 800W LED panel should then be like 1x1m or you atleast have to make each "cluster" able to turn a bit (wish my panel could do that, consider to customize it at some point, maybe split it up in two if possible) so you can aim them at your plants, since you have enough light to grow 4-8 plants easily but you wont be able to keep them all in a 50x50cm space, agin IMO total overkill, my bought "Apollo" panel is 550x350cm roughly and IMO got enough light (280W) to cover twice the space as it cover (75x50) if you make four panels on 200W each you can use one to start with and add as your plants grow and end up with one plant under each in full bloom and if you grow small autos I bet you could do two under each light or 4 rows of 4 (=12)

btw
the seedling you have going now would thrive well under a single 30W CLF so why blast it with 800W of LED, not like electricity is cheap in our Country
I grew four nice mature plants under a single 600W HPS with great results, should I use 800W of LED, I would like to grow twice of that or minimum equal to a 1000 HPS
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Slipon, apparently, old habits die hard.

30w of CFL? WTF?

LEDs all the way, 3 Cree; two NW + one WW
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
nutrients, like most things are not created equal

1800ppm of yourn might be equal to 1100 of mine. I have yet to go over 1100ppms, and only do that just prior to buds peaking
The water read at 1300 ppm before I added any nutes - this is due to a lot of minerals in the tap water as well as clay from the medium.



yea I understand, a 800W light would rock, specially when its a DIY of quality parts

but IMO a 800W LED panel should then be like 1x1m or you atleast have to make each "cluster" able to turn a bit (wish my panel could do that, consider to customize it at some point, maybe split it up in two if possible) so you can aim them at your plants, since you have enough light to grow 4-8 plants easily but you wont be able to keep them all in a 50x50cm space, agin IMO total overkill, my bought "Apollo" panel is 550x350cm roughly and IMO got enough light (280W) to cover twice the space as it cover (75x50) if you make four panels on 200W each you can use one to start with and add as your plants grow and end up with one plant under each in full bloom and if you grow small autos I bet you could do two under each light or 4 rows of 4 (=12)
I could split it up into for example four lamps, each 24x25cm and 200W.



btw
the seedling you have going now would thrive well under a single 30W CLF so why blast it with 800W of LED, not like electricity is cheap in our Country
I grew four nice mature plants under a single 600W HPS with great results, should I use 800W of LED, I would like to grow twice of that or minimum equal to a 1000 HPS
Haha I completely agree, and I do not plan on running 800W on just a single small plant ;) That would just be silly!
Remember that I'm also going to design the driver to be able to run at lower currents.
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
or maybe some mosfet pwm?
Nope! Think about the efficiency of the LEDs.. The higher current, the lower the efficiency. So the best solution would be to lower the current, instead of pulsing a high current.
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
JMD you wrote "The water read at 1300 ppm before I added any nutes - this is due to a lot of minerals in the tap water as well as clay from the medium.", which tells me to adjust ppms for however much, and of which elements, the clay and high tap water ppms consist of

I would not treat them as a non-factor
 

lax123

Well-Known Member
Oh you r right. I read a bit about it, maybe the diagrams r interesting www.all-electronics.de/media/file/4477 even though u wont understand the text ;-) efficiency is better with cc but it changes in contrast to pwm the Color temperature as you can see in the Diagram "bild 1". Blue gets more into yellow range. But maybe you already knew that :-) How do you know about electronics, DIY or some educational Background?
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
JMD you wrote "The water read at 1300 ppm before I added any nutes - this is due to a lot of minerals in the tap water as well as clay from the medium.", which tells me to adjust ppms for however much, and of which elements, the clay and high tap water ppms consist of

I would not treat them as a non-factor
That would be optimal, indeed, but I'm not able to measure what the water contains in which ratios.


Oh you r right. I read a bit about it, maybe the diagrams r interesting www.all-electronics.de/media/file/4477 even though u wont understand the text ;-) efficiency is better with cc but it changes in contrast to pwm the Color temperature as you can see in the Diagram "bild 1". Blue gets more into yellow range. But maybe you already knew that :-) How do you know about electronics, DIY or some educational Background?
I understand the text ;) The relative chromaticity of course changes with current, which for the Cree XPG looks like this (they only show a general graph for all warm white, even though there's a difference):

XPG Relative Chromaticity vs Current.png

I'd say that's acceptable, considering that the LED output 114 lumen at 350mA (1.015W and 112 lumen/watt) compared to 380 lumen at 1500mA (4.875W and 78 lumen/watt). That's an increase of the efficiency of 44%.
 

JMD

Well-Known Member
and now i know why u know about electronics ;-)
Not necessarily.. If you think I'm German, you're mistaken (but close though) :) My background is that I have an Electrical Engineering degree (and currently about to finish my M.Sc.EE).
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Just another in a long list of reasons to get rid of hydroton. Also, any tap water that has > 200ppm presents a huge problem when attempting to dial in a nutrient regimen.

Anyway, everyone should be using a QUALITY RO for cooking and drinking (scary shit in water supply, including wells) + plenty of low ppm water to mix nutes with
:bigjoint:

That would be optimal, indeed, but I'm not able to measure what the water contains in which ratios.
 
Top