• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Dems can't face the parents

ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
Can you afford $2.81? read the fucking book moron, he's a shitload more credible than you... now go fap to coldplay you winging prick...
Click to expand...
Never liked coldplay bunch of whiney fucks

Your refusal to answer tells me he wasn't there and is as reliable as pretty much everything you post...
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
Never liked coldplay bunch of whiney fucks

Your refusal to answer tells me he wasn't there and is as reliable as pretty much everything you post...
Click to expand...
You suffer from Coldplay syndrome, harden the fuck up, i'm not going to outline an entire book for you :dunce:

I tell you what why don't you buy it, read it and give us your opinion...
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
You suffer from Coldplay syndrome, harden the fuck up, i'm not going to outline an entire book for you :dunce:

I tell you what why don't you buy it, read it and give us your opinion...
Click to expand...
Is the book so short that the only content is if he was/wasn't at benghazi?

I have no interest at all in giving my money to bullshit peddlers
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
ChesusRice said:
He is to blame for what?
Click to expand...
a. authorising the Benghazi mission in the first place the main purpose of which was to support and supply jihadists.

b. covering up Benghazi to aid re-election - that includes giving or supporting a stand down order from the National Command Authority.

I believe he said he was going to helm the "most transparent administration in history" and that the "buck stops with him"... Or is this only when his does something worthwhile?
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
a. authorising the Benghazi mission in the first place the main purpose of which was to support and supply jihadists.

b. covering up Benghazi to aid re-election - that includes giving or supporting a stand down order from the National Command Authority.

I believe he said he was going to helm the "most transparent administration in history" and that the "buck stops with him"... Or is this only when his does something worthwhile?
Click to expand...
You learnt that in your bullshit book?
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
No, just common knowledge... Are you going to TRY and refute it? I look forward to your inebriated reply...
Click to expand...
First you need to show it

Thing is about "common knowledge" is that people are stupid

That's why you get them to show where they got such information.....
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
a. authorising the Benghazi mission in the first place the main purpose of which was to support and supply jihadists.

b. covering up Benghazi to aid re-election - that includes giving or supporting a stand down order from the National Command Authority.

I believe he said he was going to helm the "most transparent administration in history" and that the "buck stops with him"... Or is this only when his does something worthwhile?
Click to expand...
So you wont be happy until the goverment publishes the launch codes for the nukes?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
a. authorising the Benghazi mission in the first place the main purpose of which was to support and supply jihadists.
Do you know who we are supporting in Syria? Are you employed by the CIA?
b. covering up Benghazi to aid re-election - that includes giving or supporting a stand down order from the National Command Authority.
If It is Top Secret where we supposed to blow the cover off it?
I believe he said he was going to helm the "most transparent administration in history" and that the "buck stops with him"... Or is this only when his does something worthwhile?.
He has taken responsibility for Benghazi again are we supposed to blow the cover off covert Ops for YOU?
Click to expand...
You are becoming as tiresome as Rob Roy.
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
ChesusRice said:
So you wont be happy until the goverment publishes the launch codes for the nukes?
Click to expand...
LOL says the guy who so hypocritically bashed manning, while ignoring key officials from the white house leaking information that was of a higher classification grade than that which manning leaked... Since Benghazi went bad and is no longer as classified or clandestine operation there is nothing to hide unless it directly related to the current Syria situation or that Stevens died aiding illegal weapons transfers to Al Qaeda terrorists - that wouldn't have played well on the TV 3 months before an election; "Obama aids Al Qaeda, Same group responsible for 9/11"
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
LOL says the guy who so hypocritically bashed manning, while ignoring key officials from the white house leaking information that was of a higher classification grade than that which manning leaked... Since Benghazi went bad and is no longer as classified or clandestine operation there is nothing to hide unless it directly related to the current Syria situation or that Stevens died aiding illegal weapons transfers to Al Qaeda terrorists - that wouldn't have played well on the TV 3 months before an election; "Obama aids Al Qaeda, Same group responsible for 9/11"
Click to expand...
Did you get that from your book?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
LOL says the guy who so hypocritically bashed manning, while ignoring key officials from the white house leaking information that was of a higher classification grade than that which manning leaked... Since Benghazi went bad and is no longer as classified or clandestine operation there is nothing to hide unless it directly related to the current Syria situation or that Stevens died aiding illegal weapons transfers to Al Qaeda terrorists - that wouldn't have played well on the TV 3 months before an election; "Obama aids Al Qaeda, Same group responsible for 9/11"
Click to expand...
I am sure there are still operatives in the area and other actors that wouldnt want details of the mission put out as they probably would get killed

Would that satisfy you?

And again with the Al Qaeda insinuations.
Do you know who we support in Syria?
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
I am sure there are still operatives in the area and other actors that wouldnt want details of the mission put out as they probably would get killed

Would that satisfy you?

And again with the Al Qaeda insinuations.
Do you know who we support in Syria?
Click to expand...
We shouldn't be supporting either one: Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself.

I think that's a good idea for Syria.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
We shouldn't be supporting either one: Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself.

I think that's a good idea for Syria.
Click to expand...
Well in that case. Dont you think the right thing to do is supply the Syrian rebels so they kill each other more efficiently?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top