UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
keep letting the perfect (in your eyes) be the enemy of the good.
then cry when no progress is made because you want legal meth.
The feds will "let" Washington and Colorado MJ laws go into effect
- Thread starter TheGoodGrower
- Start date
then cry when no progress is made because you want legal meth.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
your wasted vote in a critical swing state could have put the bigger war monger in power, mega Killer.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
[/URL]
Ya Ok ..........[/QUOTE]
I think everyone everyone who was paying attention, that my posts about RP are said tounge in cheek.
I've posted many times who I've voted for and every time I've said that I voted for GJ.
RON PAUL 2016!
Doer
Well-Known Member
What a bunch of jerks, huh? Sorry I was at work or I would have said it sooner.
El Dumbfuck over there will revive a YEARS old thread and then say the other guy did it. Seriously broken personality. WTF? Do simply ignore the detritus around here.
This is indeed exactly how it is. And believe me there are some on here are are not faking or trolling. They actually are as dumb as a box of rocks.
The 9th and 10th are the heart unbelievable peace in my life. I shut of the Newz-joke and go outside.
I don't have to pretend to be free or listen to the junior insistence that I'm not. The 9th in mine and the 10th is the State very real, Fuck off, to this Federal Govt.
People rule in Counties. These States have Warred between themselves. And still are quite actually and just less bloody now. Tenn. Valley Authority stance is something like....Who's water is water, anyway? (come again?) It is being low blowed and sucker punched, ambushed, etc, in Court.
The Fed is not a figment of it's own imagination. It the imagination of these several States. The States let the Fed exist. Don't forget it.
The Fed has no standing Independent Voice. The Exec has that for too many years, imo. The People's House funds this mess. Don't forget it.
Shut it down. Who care? The wrong people for the wrong reasons, is who. A small number of devious thought bullies, is who.
I wish more people would read the manual like yourself, my good fellow, and I thank you for that.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Oh you are so sexy when you go on an incomprehensible, incoherant rantWhat a bunch of jerks, huh? Sorry I was at work or I would have said it sooner.
El Dumbfuck over there will revive a YEARS old thread and then say the other guy did it. Seriously broken personality. WTF? Do simply ignore the detritus around here.
This is indeed exactly how it is. And believe me there are some on here are are not faking or trolling. They actually are as dumb as a box of rocks.
The 9th and 10th are the heart unbelievable peace in my life. I shut of the Newz-joke and go outside.
The 9th in mine and the 10th is the State very real, Fuck off, to this Federal Govt.
People rule in Counties. These States have Warred between themselves. And still are quite actually and just less bloody now. Tenn. Valley Authority stance is something like....Who's water is water, anyway? (come again?) It is being low blowed and sucker punched, ambushed, etc, in Court.
The Fed is not a figment of it's own imagination. It the imagination of these several States. The States let the Fed exist. Don't forget it.
The Fed has no standing Independent Voice. The Exec has that for too many years, imo. The People's House funds this mess. Don't forget it.
Shut it down. Who care? The wrong people for the wrong reasons, is who. A small number of devious thought bullies, is who.
I wish more people would read the manual like yourself, my good fellow, and I thank you for that.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
The bipolar outbursts (or meth rush) really makes you shine
Doer
Well-Known Member
It is not bi-polar....more like a meth rush.
I do feel shiny and I like me bery much. Youse too.
TheGoodGrower
Active Member
The supreme court hasn't but that doesn't mean its not unconstitutional. The supreme court at one time argued that slaves could be captured in other states that forbid slavery and returned to their owners. So lets not assume that they always are just or right in their rulings.
As far as Chesus question about child prostitution. That is a state issue. Just like murder, rape, and theft. So your question is kind of absurd and implies that if we didn't have a federal govt then some states would be cool with child prostitution. Please, take a little bit of time and read the Constitution. Its not very long. In specific Article 1 Section 8 where the powers delegated to congress are. You'll find that the federal govts purpose was not to over-ride and nullify state govt, but its to form a common ground for the states to interact with each other. That is why states ratified the Constitution, not individuals. The states came together for some very few specified common goals... and that is it. Otherwise they were still 13 independent states. No state would have joined the union if it meant they would not have the final say as to the day to day affairs in their state.
As far as Chesus question about child prostitution. That is a state issue. Just like murder, rape, and theft. So your question is kind of absurd and implies that if we didn't have a federal govt then some states would be cool with child prostitution. Please, take a little bit of time and read the Constitution. Its not very long. In specific Article 1 Section 8 where the powers delegated to congress are. You'll find that the federal govts purpose was not to over-ride and nullify state govt, but its to form a common ground for the states to interact with each other. That is why states ratified the Constitution, not individuals. The states came together for some very few specified common goals... and that is it. Otherwise they were still 13 independent states. No state would have joined the union if it meant they would not have the final say as to the day to day affairs in their state.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they actually have ruled around the CSA. as stupid as the act is, it's not unconstitutional.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
You mean the 13 states that initially each tendered there own money?
yeah that experiment worked out real well
TheGoodGrower
Active Member
See, you never went and read the Constitution like I suggested. Otherwise you would have seen in section 8 of the first article the following powers that the federal govt was granted, which include:
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You bring up interesting points.
Thomas Woods wrote a book on State Nullification recently that gets into these kinds of things. Of course if states should be free from a tyrannical federal government...shouldn't individuals be free from a tyrannical state?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
If the questions get too hard for you, I can dumb them down.
yjetyietijian
New Member
You didn't make it to law school did you?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Affirmative action didn't cover hairy primates. Besides lawyers must pledge allegiance to an unjust system as the first step in their whore training.You didn't make it to law school did you?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Please do and stick to reality, not the religion of the yeti.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Did you, stranger?You didn't make it to law school did you?