We don't take well to the increased density.Polar bears love it, more polar bears now than in the 1800's
the lat thread ended with me asking you to cite this and you running away, never to be heard from again.It's probably not a conspiracy for the millions of dupes that have and continue to parrot the exaggerated predictions of doom and destruction (which time is now disproving on a regular basis).
go ahead and list some of them then. i get a kick out of exposing those quacks for the idiots they are.You do realize there are thousands of scientists (including climatologists) that don't agree with MMGW, don't receive a penny from "BIG OIL", don't receive grants for taking the MMGW low road to easy money
#76 - Around 97% of climate experts agree that humans are causing global warmingthe lat thread ended with me asking you to cite this and you running away, never to be heard from again.
i repeat my request.
go ahead and list some of them then. i get a kick out of exposing those quacks for the idiots they are.
it's probably just a worldwide conspiracy for research stipends how were we so dumb about this?
i mean, you can't come within 15 points of accurate with simple scientific polling data, but you probably know way better than peer reviewed and publishing climatologists.
Of course it is...Global warming is predicted to lead to local instances of local cooling.
WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about ice fishing. Reported as Spam!the world's top climatologists have nothing on the people listening to rush limbaugh.
our decades in the making conspiracy has been folied, folks. back to making gay commie babies with fluoride and secretly controlling hollywood, all media, and the money supply.
didn't cite any of those, but good job on proving what a limited "intellect" you have.#76 - Around 97% of climate experts agree that humans are causing global warming
#89 - An Independent Review concluded that CRU’s actions were normal and didn’t threaten the integrity of peer review
That's three (3) so far...
why are the top climatologists not heeding your words of wisdom?WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about ice fishing. Reported as Spam!
I already cited them back in post #8 if this thread or do you have an issue with reading you two bit leftard? Thank you for proving ONCE AGAIN what a limited intellect you havedidn't cite any of those, but good job on proving what a limited "intellect" you have.
Have you listened to yourself lately? You're breaking up...hello?...come in stupid!...Ahhh, they're you are. What words of wisdom? I'm just trying to talk about walleyes!why are the top climatologists not heeding your words of wisdom?
goddamn you are incurably stupid.I already cited them back in post #8 if this thread or do you have an issue with reading you two bit leftard? Thank you for proving ONCE AGAIN what a limited intellect you have
excellent rebuttal.Have you listened to yourself lately? You're breaking up...hello?...come in stupid!...Ahhh, they're you are. What words of wisdom? I'm just trying to talk about walleyes!
See I am following kelly4 here, this thread is only one page long....Chrome has this nifty little find feature.....you are the one that mentioned scientists first.....assuming of course a climatologist is a scientist.excellent rebuttal.
make sure to remind scientists about this instrumental temperature record, like i said, they would be lost without you pointing out these basic facts for them.
it is an honor to watch you work.
Derp. I said local twice. Must be a union post. cnOf course it is...
What facts are you talking about?excellent rebuttal.
make sure to remind scientists about this instrumental temperature record, like i said, they would be lost without you pointing out these basic facts for them.
it is an honor to watch you work.
you ask me to cite your thinkprogress.gay heroes, the site where ALL your talking points come from, then call me stupid? Keep up the great form bucky boy... Oh and a non-contribution would be to go around all day from thread to thread defending your hero, no matter what. Irony abounds since thinkprogress.gay is basically what you parrot non-stop day in day out. Sounds like man-hands should take back her macgoddamn you are incurably stupid.
"i already cited them back in post 8", you say. well good for you! we're all very proud! did you also make a stinky in the toilet and flush it all by yourself, child?
no one is disputing that you made yet another worthless post on post 8. what i am disputing was what I cited, not what your worthless ass cited. can you even fucking read past your virgin anger?
good job on basically parroting what i said for the rest of your worthless post.
you are quickly proving yourself to be one of the most worthless non-contributors the politics section has ever seen. just an angry little virgin.
ooooh, taking tips from desert dud and trying to play dumb, eh?What facts are you talking about?
Please expound...
yet another worthless post filled with your virgin anger.you ask me to cite your thinkprogress.gay heroes, the site where ALL your talking points come from, then call me stupid? Keep up the great form bucky boy... Oh and a non-contribution would be to go around all day from thread to thread defending your hero, no matter what. Irony abounds since thinkprogress.gay is basically what you parrot non-stop day in day out. Sounds like man-hands should take back her mac