desert dude
Well-Known Member
It shouldn't be. However the popularity of civil suits with the surviving recipients of defense fire has made it so that if yer gonna shoot, shoot for keeps. No in-betweens. Dead men don't sue.
Otherwise Samwell would be right, but I must disagree because, well, lawyers peeing in the punch bowl. cn
It is never a good idea to "shoot to wound". If you are going to use lethal force then your intention ought to be lethal.
Your stress meter is pegged and you are calmly calculating how to shoot some guy in the thigh while missing the femoral artery? Sounds like a good way to end up a statistic.