It's not someone 'getting in the way' of a bullet.
u mean fired into the back of the asshole getting up off the ground. ur a douche. fire into the street. lmfao. clearly he runs out into the street like a madman spraying at them instead of staying inside the doorway and firing a whole 7-8 feet away.
No where did I say that. I said he fired into the street, which he clearly did. Did you not watch the video or did your fingers beat your brain in a race to comment?
um yeah im that much of a pussy. what if ur attacker or would be assailant has a gun or weapon of his own. should i let him close the gap to use my crafty hand to knife or hand to gun combat skills but im not willing to risk it. u would be dumb as fuck if u were.
Where in the DSM-IV does it say that having a retort is a mental problem? I must have missed that one in Psychology....
I emphatically disagree with this. cn
If you're going to go down that road and reinterpret what I say or put words in my mouth, just own up to it and I will peacefully ignore your future posts.
Unclear. It's not... what?
If you had read my post, you would have read that criminals care NOT what laws are in place. It's not a hurdle for them, it's an impediment only to law abiding citizens.
I believe you could rationalize anything you so desire but that doesn't make it right.
There is virtually nothing that can't be used as a weapon somehow. CO2, glass, a nail, a sponge could suffocate as easily as as pillow, you could even use a large piece of steak to kill someone.
Excuse my blatant disregard for assuming that you were an adult and understood the finer aspects of sarcasm.
I guess I'm still 'old school' I prefer my old .50cal HawkenI'll take one such; thank you. cn
My point was that your argument sounded exactly like arguing for tougher car laws. It would certainly make the streets safer for everyone if at least somewhat regular driving tests were required. Or is that somehow helping the state too?
They're criminals because they disregard laws, laws won't stop them in all cases but, having some storage regulations would stop guns from being stolen as frequently. I've never heard of someone stealing a gun safe in a B and E. If they do steal it, at least you made the son of a bitch work for it. Most B and E's consist of easily stolen things.
I would think lessening the total number of gun homicides would constitute progress for either side? Less people being murdered is usually good for everyone involved, is it not?
no but i can see the fucking guy fall and the old man connect with his target one more time as the dude is getting up and running off.
You may not understand this, but sarcasm is usually denoted from tone of voice, and since this is text... well, I'll let you figure the rest out.
Not at all. My opine had to do with the overwhelming number of bad drivers there are. Car laws will never improve the skill of the operators.
So, to reduce the number of gun thefts, you're willing to permanently impinge upon everyone's rights? How progressive of you.
Either you choose not to hear it or you are woefully uninformed.
It depends on the cost of that security. Liberty exchanged for security leads to loss of both.
You saw the bullet hit him now? Wow, you're super cool!
So, then you actually thought I was talking about someone jumping in front of a bullet not aimed at them?
How is expecting adults to act responsibly infringing on peoples rights? No one has even suggesting taking guns from people. You have a hyper sensitivity to this issue.
I've certainly never heard of it happening, and that's all I said. You have cases of gun safes being removed from houses?
I really don't see how you are sacrificing your liberty by appropriately storing a firearm.
A lot of your comments didn't seem overly bright, it's hard to filter them without hearing you actually say "DERP", in real life.