UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
governments were a lot different back then, it's pretty clear what they meant by the security of a free state. no one is saying to ban all guns, that's not even possible. something along the lines of a well regulated militia would do.With respect, UB: his interpretation has tons of historical context. The logic would lead there if it was a continuum argument. If you invert it, you get "nukes are bad, so ban guns!" It doesn't work well in that direction either. cn