Kynes-
Answer these 3 questions for me if you would please.
1) Do you support the United States adopting a set of laws that adhere more to a Biblical point of reference?
Again, dipshit, i am not a christian, nor am i a jew, i have no interest in or affiliation with the bible, and vewry little use for the torah outside it's historical relevance to the matter at hand.
Further, the US is not a theocracy, and i would oppose any move in that direction, whether the religion favoured were chrisitanity, judaism, buddhism or even marxism.
2) If China were to come and invade California successfully, then claim it as their own, would you recognize that claim because it was "in China's interest" to take it and part of the geopolitical evolution-throuh-conquest you mentioned? Or would you be one of the people calling for some Red Dawn-style action, even though that would be going against part of that concept of Nation's bettering their position through occupation you were speaking of..
this moronic statement disguised as a question is rhetorical masturbation at it's lowest. presumably you think the phrasing quite clever, but youre wrong. China HAS invaded Tibet, and their control of Tibet is a Fait Accompli, in the parlance of international law. in some distant time, the Tibetans may overthrow the chinese yoke, or china may collapse inward again freeing Tibet from their domination, but until such time as that happens, Tibet is OWNED by china. all the bitching moaning and protest rallies wont change that fact. If the Chinese decide to eject the llamas and reinstal the ancient Lhasa kings, and then declare Tibet to be the Free and Sovereign Nation of Ancient Lhasa, then theres fuck all we can do about it. some might even say thats a good thing. complaining about the game of thrones and nations doesnt change the facts, or the rules of the game.
3) The deathtoll stands at 94-3, with the Palestinians obviously comprising the larger toll. 24 confirmed civilian casualties in the last 48 hrs. Do you still really believe Israel is defending itself? If so, that says all I need to hear. Because if you can look at those numbers and still think this is not an offensive you must be on drugs.
Yes. ever since the war in '67, israel has been in sporadic conflict with "non state actors" in the occupied territories. claiming this offensive/counteroffensive/police action/whatever you want to call it is the beginning and end of this conflict is retarded. history did not begin yesterday, and bombs, assasinations, kidnappings, rocket attacks, murders, and other such unpleasantness has been going on for SOME TIME. Both Sides have been hit, and both sides claim they are mearly retaliating. Both Sides have a reasonable claim that the other side is at fault. Only ONE SIDE is held accountable for their actions. and thats Israel. every suicide bomber, rocket brigade, machinegun swinging synagogue visitor, and kidnapper on the hamas side is "acting alone" or is a "civilian" when he gets nailed by the mossad, the IDF or his own fellow palestinians from a rival group, but they are never the fucntionaries of the hamas/hezzbollah organizations. israel acts in the light of day, they do not hide their actions, unlike hamas and hezzbollah.
The IDF also does not set up their military bases, checkpoints and weapons installations on the roofs of hospitals, or the playground of a primary school.
The IDF and Mossad also do not stuf retarded kid's backpacks with explosives and send the kid off towards a molsem school.
The IDF and Mossad never hijacked a cruise ship, or airliner from a foreign land, and then demanded the victim nation take action against hamas or hezbollah.