UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that eels are slimy bottom feeders is a fact.My opinion is that he meant slippery... Also, you are fat...
you seem to be struggling mentally, and showing great confusion. floundering, perhaps.
that eels are slimy bottom feeders is a fact.My opinion is that he meant slippery... Also, you are fat...
Borrowing a quote from UB...Well as usual (sound familiar), your opinion is wrong.
how exactly does one prove an opinion wrong?
Well as usual (sound familiar), your opinion is wrong.
i don't think he gets the joke, carne.Borrowing a quote from UB...
LOL!!!
I don't think he gets much of anything.i don't think he gets the joke, carne.
i really wish we could put this guy on the trail with romney to display the lack of intelligence of the average romney lover.
don't say that.I don't think he gets much of anything.
I should have said *again* as this would be the fourth time she was out this year...don't say that.
he says he has a friend in chicago who will fly into town and fellate him if romney wins.
this may be his best chance. no wonder he's rooting so hard for romney.
you do realize in order for Iran to have a route to the Mediterranean sea they would still have to cross either Iraq or Turkey borders before they even get to Syria...so WTF are you and Romney talking about. You have no route with out permission from Iraq or TurkeyYes, because you still struggle with the task of drawing Iran's route to the Mediterranean sea... Among quite a few other things like finding NorCal flounder...
Trade sanctions have restricted Iran's ability to transport arms and goods through its own seaports. Iran is being forced to using air transportation to move cargo through an air corridor through Iraqi airspace into Syria and down to its seaports. We're not talking ground transportation through borders, it's just a matter of airspace provisions. There is also talks of a pipeline through Turkey and ending in Syrian ports on the Mediterranean Sea.you do realize in order for Iran to have a route to the Mediterranean sea they would still have to cross either Iraq or Turkey borders before they even get to Syria...so WTF are you and Romney talking about. You have no route with out permission from Iraq or Turkey
Tehran certainly uses Syria to supply the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas, but that has little to do with the water (sea) as Romney so said. and what pipeline talks are going to have Iran passing thru Kurd land ??? got a link to that oneTrade sanctions have restricted Iran's ability to transport arms and goods through its own seaports. Iran is being forced to using air transportation to move cargo through an air corridor through Iraqi airspace into Syria and down to its seaports. We're not talking ground transportation through borders, it's just a matter of airspace provisions. There is also talks of a pipeline through Turkey and ending in Syrian ports on the Mediterranean Sea.
With how often your *opinions* have been proven wrong lately, I am hardly concerned about your opinion of me...
how exactly does one prove an opinion wrong?
way to keep digging that stupid hole, you fucking idiot.
you're the gift that keeps giving, kiddo.
o·pin·ion
[uh-pin-yuh n] Show IPA
noun1.a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient toproduce complete certainty.
2.a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
An eel could take lessons from you. Seriously.
So bucky, when he denotes *opinions* as a joke, meaning it's not your opinion, rather fact that you attempt to play off as opinion, you try run with him calling it an opinion? ComicalWell as usual (sound familiar), your opinion is wrong.
I am sorry, but every president going back 40 years or so has talked about energy independence. It's become this talking point of many presidents, and not one president has got us closer to that. I believe obama more then I do romney when it comes this subject. The lobbyist for the oil companies probably have a huge strangle hold on washington. I understand the we have not found anything comparable to gas, but we have keep looking. Even if we have 50 years of oil below us. 1. Doesn't mean that oil will stay domestically. 2. Doesn't mean we should be piliging the land if its last resources. I sure in hell love my national parks and my oceans. I sure in hell don't want to see oil rigs everywhere.I just don't see how this thread is relevant to politics. I understand Romney is running for office, but what does this have to do with anything?
Isn't it worth a shot to see what he can bring to the table? Energy independence sounds a lot better than 90$ billion in green energy Solyndra A123 subsidies. Electric car manufacturing jobs in Finland for cars costing well over 50 grand. Its not practical for the middle class
In truth if we had listen to what President Carter was saying and wanting this country to do back in the late 70's we would not be having these energy issues.I am sorry, but every president going back 40 years or so has talked about energy independence. It's become this talking point of many presidents, and not one president has got us closer to that. I believe obama more then I do romney when it comes this subject. The lobbyist for the oil companies probably have a huge strangle hold on washington. I understand the we have not found anything comparable to gas, but we have keep looking. Even if we have 50 years of oil below us. 1. Doesn't mean that oil will stay domestically. 2. Doesn't mean we should be piliging the land if its last resources. I sure in hell love my national parks and my oceans. I sure in hell don't want to see oil rigs everywhere.
Peace
Salt
Yep, Jimmy "peanuts" Carter is widely known to have been the "almost greatest" president ever. He's definately in the top 50, anyways.In truth if we had listen to what President Carter was saying and wanting this country to do back in the late 70's we would not be having these energy issues.
The technology was not available 40 years ago. The technology we have now to extract fuels from the earth has come a LONG way. Energy independence is now finally possible. We have more energy at our fingertips than any other country in the world. Even more than Saudi Arabia. It just doesn't seem like it because of all the federal regulations prohibiting America from reaching its full potential. WE can vote for Obama who will continue to pay off his campaign donors with green energy subsidies, or we can put a president in office who will make life cheaper and easier for the middle class RIGHT NOWI am sorry, but every president going back 40 years or so has talked about energy independence. It's become this talking point of many presidents, and not one president has got us closer to that. I believe obama more then I do romney when it comes this subject. The lobbyist for the oil companies probably have a huge strangle hold on washington. I understand the we have not found anything comparable to gas, but we have keep looking. Even if we have 50 years of oil below us. 1. Doesn't mean that oil will stay domestically. 2. Doesn't mean we should be piliging the land if its last resources. I sure in hell love my national parks and my oceans. I sure in hell don't want to see oil rigs everywhere.
Peace
Salt
He formed the Dept of Energy. Go look up his national energy policy. You might learn a thing or two.Yep, Jimmy "peanuts" Carter is widely known to have been the "almost greatest" president ever. He's definately in the top 50, anyways.
That is a remarkably disjoint little manifesto. I suspect Adderall, Cpt. Morgan and a middling Indica all working in concert. cn