Bengazi

[NLXSK1]

it was you who implied that liberals were perfectly OK with them.

you know what that reeks of?

If the US is conducting assassinations of al quaeda leadership and there is no hue and cry from the liberals, what else am I to suspect??

I dont hear any screaming about all the collateral deaths and instant death penalties commanded by sky killer from the liberals... The silence is resounding...

Those are assassinations as much as if done by bullet or poison. Yet we dont hear about it on the news and there are no protests.

So, what else am I to think about all this silence from the left??? They dont seem to have a problem with the nobel peace prize winner killing handfuls of people that they *think* are terrorists....

The hypocrisy is glaring and the silence is appalling...

 

[UncleBuck]

If the US is conducting assassinations of al quaeda leadership and there is no hue and cry from the liberals, what else am I to suspect??

I dont hear any screaming about all the collateral deaths and instant death penalties commanded by sky killer from the liberals... The silence is resounding...

Those are assassinations as much as if done by bullet or poison. Yet we dont hear about it on the news and there are no protests.

So, what else am I to think about all this silence from the left??? They dont seem to have a problem with the nobel peace prize winner killing handfuls of people that they *think* are terrorists....

The hypocrisy is glaring and the silence is appalling...

yep, liberals love seeing innocent people die.

put it on a bumper sticker and this election is all wrapped up.

desperate.

 

[beenthere]

there's a difference between respectfully disagreeing with something, and making up an alternate narrative based on pure lies and scare tactics....

No matter what it is, it's always a difference when democrats are involved, the only one you're fooling is yourself.

 

[beenthere]

yep, liberals love seeing innocent people die.

put it on a bumper sticker and this election is all wrapped up.

desperate.

Not sure why you're so vehemently defending liberals, you are far from a liberal, you dipshit.

 

[UncleBuck]

Not sure why you're so vehemently defending liberals, you are far from a liberal, you dipshit.

now clayton is not only a master at telling other people what their racial identification is, but also at telling people what their political identification is.

just awesome.

the whole "liberals love assassinations" canard reeks of desperation. but "republicans love rape babies" does not. ya see, rape babies are a gift from god (using republicans' own words), and gifts from god are great.

thus, republicans love rape babies.

and also spamming benghazi threads in a desperate, last minute, last ditch effort to save their savior from the most embarrassing loss ever.

 

[NLXSK1]

now clayton is not only a master at telling other people what their racial identification is, but also at telling people what their political identification is.

just awesome.

the whole "liberals love assassinations" canard reeks of desperation. but "republicans love rape babies" does not. ya see, rape babies are a gift from god (using republicans' own words), and gifts from god are great.

thus, republicans love rape babies.

and also spamming benghazi threads in a desperate, last minute, last ditch effort to save their savior from the most embarrassing loss ever.

If you honestly think I am looking for converts on a pot website you are more deluded than I thought...

Romney is still gaining in the polls, the desperation you keep talking about is being projected by you. Primarily because your messiah is going to lose.

 

[beenthere]

now clayton is not only a master at telling other people what their racial identification is, but also at telling people what their political identification is.

just awesome.

the whole "liberals love assassinations" canard reeks of desperation. but "republicans love rape babies" does not. ya see, rape babies are a gift from god (using republicans' own words), and gifts from god are great.

thus, republicans love rape babies.

and also spamming benghazi threads in a desperate, last minute, last ditch effort to save their savior from the most embarrassing loss ever.

You think you're a liberal but the fact is, your not.
Just like you thought you paid a higher rate in federal taxes than Romney and made a complete fool of yourself trying to prove it.

Why don't you break the family tradition and go occupy a fucking job, ya slug.

 

[UncleBuck]

Romney is still gaining in the polls

 

[UncleBuck]

You think you're a liberal but the fact is, your not.
Just like you thought you paid a higher rate in federal taxes than Romney and made a complete fool of yourself trying to prove it.

Why don't you break the family tradition and go occupy a fucking job, ya slug.

*you're

 

[beenthere]

Seriously UB, break that family tradition of yours and get a job. Be the first one in your family to be a giver instead of taker, you'll be proud some day!

 

[UncleBuck]

Seriously UB, break that family tradition of yours and get a job. Be the first one in your family to be a giver instead of taker, you'll be proud some day!

 

[TheMan13]

The day it happened obama mentioned it was an act of terror

O simply mentioned the word "Terrorism" in closing and reference to 9-11-01 off of his written statement. At 4:20 in the clip bellow O states "No act of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation..." This is immediately followed by "Today we morn four more Americans..." clearly states something different! The fact that he mentioned this at a televised debate and it was confirmed by the moderator is beyond absurd and by no means the truth. As the truth of the matter in Bengazi was aired in real time below the White House and as the Commander & Chief O chose to be more concerned about his perpetual campaign. Where are we now with O's transparency? About the same place as hope & change? What exactly do we have to look "forward" at with this man?!?

[video=youtube;rDANcaPx1xg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDANcaPx1xg[/video]

 

[TheMan13]

yep, liberals love seeing innocent people die.

put it on a bumper sticker and this election is all wrapped up.

desperate.

What happened to all those liberal bumper stickers from 2000-2008 fucktard? What happened to all those screaming sirens of your antiwar and human rights buddies? How the fuck did your views on Guantanamo change simply by O taking office with that absurd peace prize in hand he never speaks of? What will your bumper stickers say in 2013? Obviously nothing to do with integrity or character that is for certain!

 

[lokie]

It screams about the stonewalling of the administration just to get past the election. And furthermore seems as if Obama is elected, he doesnt really care about the optics or reality of the Bengazi situation.

if the hnic gets back in the truth will never be herd. sad but so.
Mostly he pardons all but him self and then brokers a deal for the
rendition he is willing to recite for his own pardon.


all the while smiling in disgrace.

 

[TheMan13]

[video=youtube;oZRLez8-zFA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZRLez8-zFA[/video]

 

[TheMan13]

Given the subject at hand here refers to O's handling of "terrorism", what's up with Major Hasan murdering 13 soldiers in Fort Hood, Texas? Did O not know immediately that this man was yelling "Allahu Akbar!" as he randomly murdered these individuals? How long after 11-5-09 was it that O was informed of Anwar al-Awlaki's role? How has O handled the al-Awlaki problem? Did O not repeatedly deny Muslim extremist terrorism as he asked our people not to jump to conclusions here? Has he come clean here today? What is Maj Hasan being charged with now and why has it yet to make it to trial? Any of this rhetoric sound familiar? Man, I just can't make this shit up ...

BTW lefties, not one person lost their life in Watergate!

[video=youtube;yS-Wz8SH8Nw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS-Wz8SH8Nw[/video]

 

[Doer]

If he was a Sharia sympathizer it would explain a lot. No war on terror, he is a closet Jehadist himself. Next term, he sells out more to the UN. The UN wants the US to outlaw bashing Muslims, hate speech. Criminal. He wants fodder for the World Court. Yet, who was just Inciting to Riot, in the Muslim world, over faked outrage about bashing Islam, in some Video. A shameless cover up for election bid.

The SecDef brags to a Father, she will jail the Video guy and she does. Finds the technicality, a probation violation having nothing to do with this and he gets Brown Shirted and perp walked. But, that was after two thugs from State, beat the crap out him.

Some might give the excuse that was coincident, the beating. But, it also becomes the perfect excuse to bring in the Cops. So, dual abuse of power. Which is it? Probation violation or protective custody. Doesn't matter. When the Presidential cover up starts none of us are safe.

 

[TheMan13]

If he was a Sharia sympathizer it would explain a lot. No war on terror, he is a closet Jehadist himself. Next term, he sells out more to the UN. The UN wants the US to outlaw bashing Muslims, hate speech. Criminal. He wants fodder for the World Court. Yet, who what just Inciting to Riot, in the Muslim world, over faked outrage about bashing Islam, in some Video. A shameless cover up for election bid.

So true brother! Does the left even have a talking point for O supporting Blasphemy as international law? How could a US Constitutional scholar NOT know that this would be in complete contradiction?!? What about the true "War on Women" occurring in these Muslim countries? Why has O, as stated champion of Women, not addressed a need for intentional law to protect their human rights here? Hell he could have even carried that damn piece prize

 

[Doer]

So true brother! Does the left even have a talking point for O supporting Blasphemy as international law? How could a US Constitutional scholar NOT know that this would be in complete contradiction?!? What about the true "War on Women" occurring in these Muslim countries? Why has O, as stated champion of Women, not addressed a need for intentional law to protect their human rights here? Hell he could have even carried that damn piece prize

Laws don't hurt people, Lawyers do. Because of the depth of study imposed by the handlers in the upbringing of the Candidate and the Eyes only Intelligence view of a President, they have fine ability to find the cracks in the Constitution.

As we see in this forum in micro, there has been real shift in the value systems of youth. Most, just organic info overload, when we are trying to simply get laid. Difficult to concentrate, but easy to mind control. As I mentioned before, I've been a Che-ist. Lots of girls.!! If you are a young Pub, those girls want Marriage.

IAC, the values that are being taught to youth as social tinkering, without any real depth, btw, have lead to a reduction of self reliance. And it has lead to this attitude that rules don't matter. Only getting caught matters. Less reliance on self and less care for rules, leads to mobs of sheep that are easily taught to hate. Hate is a comfortable companion as any warrior knows. We will see what the hate vote is and that to me is the stupid test.

 

[lokie]

[video=youtube;cuASoVK8f9c]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuASoVK8f9c[/video]