ceestyle
Well-Known Member
No, but take one example: watering frequency. I know that nature does not produce xxmL of water twice per day, but I know it's best for the plant to have consistently moist but not soaked soil.Ceestyle....I see where your going with this. But selecting optimum growing conditions from nature and transferring those to indoor growing does not make the growing process fallacious at all. ...Or am I missing you point..
Take the vegetative lighting example: even 18hrs does not mimic nature, at least nowhere I've lived. Yet we know from experience that more light than is provided by nature this time of year increases overall yield.
Take carbon dioxide enrichment: how is that mimicking nature? It's not .. neither is jacking up nutrient availability, using pesticides, etc. We just know it's better for production of foliage and flowers.
So the fallacious argument is that because conditions more accurately mimic nature they will necessarily make happier or more productive plants.