nope. higher wages and steady, reliable employment for 40 years would do more than a single million dollar payment.
The problem with wages is that the government continues to devalue the dollar by printing more of them. This causes inflation. Otherwise, there would be no need for prices to go up if everything remained the same. An ounce of gold bought a good suit 200 years ago. An ounce of gold still buys a good suit today. The value of the gold and the suit have not changed. The value of the money gets inflated when the government prints more of it.
So what the government is doing right now is devaluing the dollar. The value of food, gas, gold, silver, etc. has not gone up, our dollar has gone down in value.
Taxes are a drag on growth. The more money the government confiscates from business the less profit there is to expand and grow.
You talk about demand as an aggregate. I am speaking of demand on an individual company basis. A local company that makes enough profit can set up a branch elsewhere. This increases that particular companies ability to make sales, etc. Even though there is not strong demand on a global level, successful companies can grow individually. This spurs economic development as more jobs are created, more wages paid, more taxes paid, etc. The fact that a company can take the profit and invest it to get a larger return is what makes the economic difference. Companies produce goods and services which increase the GDP. It has to grow somehow and I dont think you are arguing that government grows the GDP.
Government does not create economic development. If the government takes $1.00 in profit from a company and gives that $1.00 out in welfare that dollar stops economic growth at that point. To get more growth the government has to confiscate more. The government merely skims the profit off of economic development and re-distributes it as goods and services to government employees and the citizens. But it has to take that money to begin with.