Every study proves the opposite.Give everyone guns for all i care, if everyone has them shooting deaths will triple, bet my life on it
automatics are illegal just sayin. an assault rifle doesnt become one until you assault someone with it. law abiding citizens dont go around assaulting people. You could have an assault laptop or an assault baseball bat....My solution? nobody can have automatics or assault rifles ...own a gun? sure..in your home...not out in public...you want less crime? stop locking up people for weed and overloading the court docket will silly shit... when you rob someone at gunpoint and get arrested/convicted ..and you get less time then most people growing a harmless plant..that is a huge fucking problem.
do i have to correct every retarded misinterpretation here?What's your guys solution then? Since you don't believe people have the right to protect themselves....
who's trying to abridge your rights you little whiny pussy?What I continue to ask is that you stop trying to abridge my rights
The point of this thread is to insult the idea that people have the right to protect themselves by legally being armed while the lefties offering no alternative solutions.do i have to correct every retarded misinterpretation here?
the point of this thread was not that no one should have the right to self protection, it was that more guns in that theater was not the solution.
I have no solution
you'll have to point out where chesus insults people for wanting to be legally armed.The point of this thread is to insult the idea that people have the right to protect themselves by legally being armed while the lefties offering no alternative solutions.
No the point of this thread is to call out the IDIOTThe point of this thread is to insult the idea that people have the right to protect themselves by legally being armed while the lefties offering no alternative solutions.
Video is on the internetSeemed to emerge yesterday that the "shooter" didn't even point/fire his weapon at NYPD officers, yet they still smoked him.
He supposedly had a .45 semi with a magazine, so I assume a 1911? He didn't fire at officers, but he did produce it. Doesn't Manhattan have a handgun ban too?Video is on the internet
it is kinda bizarre the way it looked
[video=youtube;EYWgrHwrlf8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYWgrHwrlf8[/video]
He bought the gun legally in Florida in 1991 never registered it in New YorkHe supposedly had a .45 semi with a magazine, so I assume a 1911? He didn't fire at officers, but he did produce it. Doesn't Manhattan have a handgun ban too?
Thanks for that video, newspaper made it out he didn't point or fire, he clearly pointed it at officers tho.
I think this is the guy I was referring toThe problem with this WHOLE thread is that there is ZERO evidence to support the conclusion that armed people in Colorado would have shot innocent people. None. Just because it happened in this circumstance does not mean it will happen the same way in all circumstances and anyone who says it will is an idiot.
It's a darken theatre enviromentYeah, I am sure more guns and shooters would have resulted in less death/injury.LOL I picture a dozen cowboys shooting at anyone they see with a gun..probably shoot at each other and return fire.
Now suddenly people who carry concealed are cowboys.Yeah, I am sure more guns and shooters would have resulted in less death/injury.LOL I picture a dozen cowboys shooting at anyone they see with a gun..probably shoot at each other and return fire.