red1966Oh no!!! Now I'm a pedophile, too? UncleShitBritches is too stupid to see all the results are all on RIU...........lol..........Poor babies, do your butts hurt that bad?
Throwing away a vote would be to perpetuate the two party system. What do you win if the person you settle for is a douche bag? The satisfaction of NOT voting for the other douche bag? Follow your instinct, don't support either douchebag.this sucks as i will openly admit i voted for the man first time around.. mostly because i was so sick of bush and the repubs, but the longer he's in office the less and less i'm liking the man and his presidency, and i find this to be extremely disturbing to say the least...
now i'm all fucked up on what to do come november.. i really don't see myself getting behind this man again, and i'm surely not a fan of mitt... what's a man to do.. i'm starting to think about simply writing in ron paul, but i kind of feel like that's throwing away a vote, and i just don't know at this point in time..
Carrying your logic a bit further out....why not vote against both ? Do you really think things will be improve regardless of whether Obama or Romney is President?Voting AGAINST a candidate is a perfectly legitimate vote. If, of two viable candidates, one is worse than the other, then you should vote for the better of the two. No candidate can be perfect for everybody.
but what do you do if none of the lesses are evil, only different...you can pick which evil you can live with the most...and the preventative detainment thing is already done..that has happened...so a new president won't fix it..we know this...Voting AGAINST a candidate is a perfectly legitimate vote. If, of two viable candidates, one is worse than the other, then you should vote for the better of the two. No candidate can be perfect for everybody.
But killing Americans without a trial and indefinite detention for being labeled a terrorist by a law enforcement official is a step up? How about covering up a gun walking operation that has killed untold number of Mexicans and a border patrol agent? How about eclipsing 8 years of executive orders in 3.5? More money into MMJ raids than any other president? Do you guys just forget immediately the stupid shit Obama admin does?I don't know if I can stomach Mitt Romney...I mean he just seems to be a bit too outrageous with the abortions and the birth control and just everything he thinks and believes. He seems to be a little too much of a zealot for my tastes.
If Obama wins I want the pubs to take the Senate, if Romney wins i hope the dems hold it. Neither party has shown they are responsible enough to hold the holy trinity.but what do you do if none of the lesses are evil, only different...you can pick which evil you can live with the most...and the preventative detainment thing is already done..that has happened...so a new president won't fix it..we know this...
I am not sure that there is a lesser evil really in this race.
The idea was to vote for the one who will do the least damage. I know things aren't improving with Obama, they're getting worse for most. A vote for Romney might jeopardize my job, but I've never had trouble finding work. I feel a duty to vote for the candidate who will serve the whole country the best.Carrying your logic a bit further out....why not vote against both ? Do you really think things will be improve regardless of whether Obama or Romney is President?
The idea was to vote for the one who will do the least damage. I know things aren't improving with Obama, they're getting worse for most. A vote for Romney might jeopardize my job, but I've never had trouble finding work. I feel a duty to vote for the candidate who will serve the whole country the best.
I know you watch Fox NewsThe idea was to vote for the one who will do the least damage. I know things aren't improving with Obama, they're getting worse for most. A vote for Romney might jeopardize my job, but I've never had trouble finding work. I feel a duty to vote for the candidate who will serve the whole country the best.