you have to pay $13.50 to vote in pennsylvania

ginwilly said:
lol, I had no idea that was a Beck site, I thought it was a potsmoker thing.

what site would you like referenced to prove Chesus was talking out of his ass when he said Bush dropped those charges. Doesn't matter, pick a few if you like.
Click to expand...

anything but the beck site or other "fear the scary black people" site will do.

but there is nothing you can do to convince me that up is down. i can read court affidavits. this issue was dropped by the bush DOJ whether or not it was also dropped by holder.
 
And I told al dem Crack hedz dat if dey proof 2 me wit a sellfone pic dat dey votd four OBAMA da bozz of al bozzez dat dey git da free 20 rok on electshun day.
 
ginwilly said:
Bush did not goob, he wasn't involved in that election.

Because they were intimidated?

Are you seriously going to try to defend the New Black Panthers while calling everyone else a racist? Gold!

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=holder%20dro&tok=jBaK8Yw45TP5sJo1w7rHTg&cp=16&gs_id=fs&xhr=t&q=holder+drops+charges+against+black+panthers&pf=p&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=holder+drops+cha&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=3c711fb061ac048&biw=1760&bih=790
Click to expand...


ChesusRice said:
A
recent Media Matters investigation has debunked charges that the Obama
administration withdrew criminal charges against the Panthers (in fact, the Bush
administration decided not to pursue criminal charges, with Assistant Attorney
General Thomas Perez testifying that the Bush Justice Department "determined
that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal
statutes"; a civil lawsuit was filed in the last days of the Bush
administration, and a judgment won by the Obama Justice Department in May 2009).

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-3460_162-6711575.html


Pwned
Click to expand...

Pwned again
 
ginwilly said:
Bush did not goob, he wasn't involved in that election.

Because they were intimidated?

Are you seriously going to try to defend the New Black Panthers while calling everyone else a racist? Gold!

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=holder%20dro&tok=jBaK8Yw45TP5sJo1w7rHTg&cp=16&gs_id=fs&xhr=t&q=holder+drops+charges+against+black+panthers&pf=p&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=holder+drops+cha&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=3c711fb061ac048&biw=1760&bih=790
Click to expand...

who is defending the NBPP?

all we are saying is that there were no voters intimidated. to prove voter intimidation, you need intimidated voters. sorry bud. i know facts upset ya.
 
UncleBuck said:
who is defending the NBPP?

all we are saying is that there were no voters intimidated. to prove voter intimidation, you need intimidated voters. sorry bud. i know facts upset ya.
Click to expand...

I'm also saying (with citations) that the Bush Justice department dropped the criminal charges
But SOmeone
is trying to make this some kind of racial preference thing by the Obama administration
And who says the Right wing forgot how to race bait?
 
UncleBuck said:
who is defending the NBPP?

all we are saying is that there were no voters intimidated. to prove voter intimidation, you need intimidated voters. sorry bud. i know facts upset ya.
Click to expand...
dey wer negroe an dat is da skaryist except for da jewz who switch out da forms to make sure dat OBAMA winds da lecshun.
 
Wordz said:
dey wer negroe an dat is da skaryist except for da jewz who switch out da forms to make sure dat OBAMA winds da lecshun.
Click to expand...

You got that wrong
See the blacks and the whites who are suffering from white guilt vote for Obama
The Jews run the federal reserve and own the media
 
ChesusRice said:
I am scared of the New black Panthers
There are almost a 100 of hem
give or take a dozen depending on which ones are in county lock up for child support or crack offenses
Click to expand...

The New Black Panther Party reportedly has 27 chapters operating across the United States, Britain, the Caribbean and Africa. Its Web page said it has become "a great witness to the validity of the works of the original Black Panther Party," which was founded in 1966 in Oakland, Calif.

so I guess 4 members per chapter is what you are claiming?

Court records show that as late as May 5, the Justice Department was still considering an order by U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell in Philadelphia to seek judgments, or sanctions, against the three Panthers because of their failure to appear.

Bush was long gone.
 
ginwilly said:
The New Black Panther Party reportedly has 27 chapters operating across the United States, Britain, the Caribbean and Africa. Its Web page said it has become "a great witness to the validity of the works of the original Black Panther Party," which was founded in 1966 in Oakland, Calif.

so I guess 4 members per chapter is what you are claiming?

Court records show that as late as May 5, the Justice Department was still considering an order by U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell in Philadelphia to seek judgments, or sanctions, against the three Panthers because of their failure to appear.

Bush was long gone.
Click to expand...

I feel really bad anyone would confuse these people for the Black panthers
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

The New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case, sometimes known simply as the Black Panther Case, is a political controversy in the United States concerning an incident that occurred during the 2008 election. The New Black Panther Party and two of its members, Minister King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, were charged with voter intimidation for their conduct outside a polling station in Philadelphia. The Department of Justice later narrowed the charges against Minister King Shabazz and dismissed the charges against the New Black Panther Party and Jerry Jackson. The decision to dismiss the charges has led to accusations that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration is biased against white victims and unwilling to prosecute minorities for civil rights violations. These charges have been most notably made by J. Christian Adams, who in May 2010 resigned his post in the Department of Justice in protest over the Obama Administration's perceived mishandling of the case, and by his former supervisor Christopher Coates.
 
[h=3]There Is No New Black Panther Party: An Open Letter From the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation[/h]In response from numerous requests from individual's seeking information on the "New Black Panthers," the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation issues this public statement to correct the distorted record being made in the media by a small band of African Americans calling themselves the New Black Panthers. As guardian of the true history of the Black Panther Party, the Foundation, which includes former leading members of the Party, denounces this group's exploitation of the Party's name and history. Failing to find its own legitimacy in the black community, this band would graft the Party's name upon itself, which we condemn.

Firstly, the people in the New Black Panthers were never members of the Black Panther Party and have no legitimate claim on the Party's name. On the contrary, they would steal the names and pretend to walk in the footsteps of the Party's true heroes, such as Black Panther founder Huey P. Newton, George Jackson and Jonathan Jackson, Bunchy Carter, John Huggins, Fred Hampton, Mark Cark, and so many others who gave their very lives to the black liberation struggle under the Party's banner.

Secondly, they denigrate the Party's name by promoting concepts absolutely counter to the revolutionary principles on which the Party was founded. Their alleged media assault on the Ku Klux Klan serves to incite hatred rather than resolve it. The Party's fundamental principle, as best articulated by the great revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara, was: "A true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." The Black Panthers were never a group of angry young militants full of fury toward the "white establishment." The Party operated on love for black people, not hatred of white people.

Furthermore, this group claims it would "teach" the black community about armed self-defense. The arrogance of this claim is overwhelmed by its reactionary nature. Blacks, especially in the South, have been armed in self-defense for a very long time; indeed, the spiritual parent of the Party itself was the Louisiana-based Deacons for Defense. However, the Party understood that the gun was not necessarily revolutionary, for the police and all other oppressive forces had guns. It was the ideology behind the gun that determined its nature.

Because the Party believed that only the masses of people would make the revolution, the Party never presumed itself to be above the people. The Party considered itself a servant of the people and taught by example. Given massive black hunger, the Party provided free breakfast for children and other free food programs. In the absence of decent medical facilities in the black community, the Party operated free medical clinics. In the face of police brutality, the Party stood up and resisted. Considering the overwhelming number of blacks facing trials and long prison terms, the Party developed free legal aids and bussing-to-prison programs.

The question the Foundation raises, then, is who are these people laying claim to the Party's history and name? Are they reactionary provocateurs, who would instigate activities counterproductive to the people's interests, causing mayhem and death? Are they entertainers, who would posture themselves before the media, and, according to numerous sources, with empty guns, to spin gold for themselves? Are they, given the history of their late-leader Khalid Muhammad, a group of anti-Semites like the very Ku Klux Klan they allegedly oppose? What is their agenda?

Conditions for blacks in America today are worse than when the Black Panther Party was formed in 1966. Blacks in the main continue to live in poverty; disproportionate percentages of blacks die from AIDS and cancer, as the black infant mortality rate continues to be double that of whites. There is a desperate need for liberation agenda. The Black Panther Party unarguably set the example, espousing principles and a history that certainly should be embraced by all those still struggling for freedom. Rather than appropriating the Party's name, however, groups that purport to represent African Americans ought to follow the Party's true historical example. In the absence of such commitment, the Foundation denounces the usurpation of the Black Panther Party name by this questionable band of self-appointed leaders.

For further reading on the Black Panther Party, please visit our website at www.blackpanther.org. Books by and about the Black Panthers can also be purchased online through this site. Suggested reading includes Revolutionary Suicide, To Die for the People, War Against the Panthers, This Side of Glory, and A Taste of Power.
 
UncleBuck said:
who is defending the NBPP?

all we are saying is that there were no voters intimidated. to prove voter intimidation, you need intimidated voters. sorry bud. i know facts upset ya.
Click to expand...

there was enough proof that a district Judge from PA pressed the DOJ to press charges.

Bush may not have investigated but if you noticed, between Nov and Jan after the elections Bush didn't do a whole lot.
 
ginwilly said:
there was enough proof that a district Judge from PA pressed the DOJ to press charges.

Bush may not have investigated but if you noticed, between Nov and Jan after the elections Bush didn't do a whole lot.
Click to expand...

So did they drop the charges or not during the Bush administration?
That is a question with only 3 answers
YES
NO
and
I dont know
 
Flagupsidedown.png
 
ChesusRice said:
So did they drop the charges or not during the Bush administration?
That is a question with only 3 answers
YES
NO
and
I dont know
Click to expand...

NO
they downgraded the charges, Holder dropped them.

I did enjoy your victory dance celebrating your ignorance though, that was cool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top