UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i never used to be, but i have made the decision to become racist after kaendar showed up.
Looks like Harry Reid has gone to far this time.
- Thread starter Winter Woman
- Start date
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
This is from the dem playbook. Make him deny he's a pig-fucker.
Unfortunately this works on the weak minded. Look at all the calls for his tax records that nobody really cared about before.
I'm about 90% sure I'm voting for Johnson but I'm really looking forward to the entertainment of this election, it's going to get muddy.
Unfortunately this works on the weak minded. Look at all the calls for his tax records that nobody really cared about before.
I'm about 90% sure I'm voting for Johnson but I'm really looking forward to the entertainment of this election, it's going to get muddy.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Correction, lots of people cared about his tax records when he got dodgey with them.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
we can't trust romney's word on his taxes because he has lied about them before, like when he was running for governor and said he was a taxpayer in massachussetts, but it turns out he was paying taxes in utah, not mass.
of course, he retroactively changed them, just like he retroactively retired from bain. the man is a bad liar.
of course, he retroactively changed them, just like he retroactively retired from bain. the man is a bad liar.
pottscreek
Well-Known Member
Makes me think insider trading..
Debunked years ago.
Can you provide some valid proof of this old fallacy, or are you nothing more than a parrot for the Daily Kos!
Until you do, it's just another BUCKY FAIL!
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
When you have a liberal rag like the Washington Post giving the bullshit UB just posted 3 pinocchios, it's amazing he is willing to parrot it. I'm amazed there are people stupid enough not to see right through this misdirection. Well, actually they do.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so, you're telling me romney is a liar? i mean, i knew that, not sure if you guys want to blaspheme your savior like that.
his own words say he was not a resident in 2000, but he went back and changed them, just like i stated.
righties are too fucking easy.
At a news conference, Romney said that he filed as a part-year resident for 1999 and a nonresident for 2000. He amended those returns, claiming Massachusetts resident status, on April 2, a week after he announced he was running for governor of Massachusetts and four days before the state Republican convention that endorsed his candidacy.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2002/06/07/romney-says-didn-file-mass-resident/cxg3maVKXTA0iIuekT4QPO/story.html
Dude, your trick of changing the goalposts is amateur at best, now, let's see you back up the claim that Romney was not a tax payer in Massachusetts! (notice the correct spelling)
Lefties are soooo fucking ignorant when it comes to taxes!
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Romney did say that
and it's not that we are ignorant on tax issues
it's just we arent rich enough to stash our money in offshore tax havens like Mitt Romney
A man so poor in college him and his wife contemplated selling stock from their portfolio
SInce neither of them had a job nor needed one
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Romney said that he filed as a part-year resident for 1999 and a nonresident for 2000. He amended those returns, claiming Massachusetts resident status
But you would still pay part year taxes in Massachusetts or Utah, Major Fail!
Just like your Wheaton College thread! LMAO
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well, sure. if you go back and retroactively amend your taxes, as i pointed out originally.
the reason for the lying and amending is because the MA constitution calls for any candidate for governor to be a resident for 7 years prior to running. so he files as a NONRESIDENT, but claims to be a resident?
cool story bro.
a conservative leaning panel cleared him based on his business ties to the state, and that is fine. i have no problem with that.
all i'm pointing out is that romney mischaracterized his taxes. he lied then, he's lying now. he was amending his taxes as he was lying about them too.
you can blow your accountant on your hunting trips and motorcycle rides all you want, won't change the fact that romney lied about his taxes 10 years ago.
You'd pay taxes in both states moron, like I've said before, you'd be much better off sticking to threads you have at least mediocre knowledge in. Try the gay marriage and global warming discussions, opinions can't be proven wrong on a regular basis there.
ink the world
Well-Known Member
I think you need to research more about Romney and Massachusetts.
He originally did not file in Mass., he went back and refiled after making the decision to run there. More tidbits from the Romney experience in Mass:
1. He refused to disclose tax info there, yet demanded that his opponents spouse release their info
2. He likely committed voter fraud. He claimed his sons unfinished basement as his address.
3. He absolutely sucked at creating jobs
4. He signed an assault rifle ban
5. He supported abortion rights
Seems like the Monopoly guy will say and do anything to get elected.
Christie 2016!
canndo
Well-Known Member
right out of the Rove debate cook book "that was debunked [years ago]". Post no evidence, no documents, no personal recollection of the situation surrounding this "debunking", merely the statement "that was debunked" is enough right Beenthere?
I have looked into Romney's past witholding of his taxes and his retroactive alterations and I have not seen any evidence of these things being "debunked", care to show us some evidence of your statement?
canndo
Well-Known Member
so the "liberal rag" that cannot be trusted, that lies all the time is now stating something that you already believe. Now it is not lying or untrustworthy but will become so again the moment it prints something with which you do not agree. How very convenient for your world view and the sanctity of your ideology.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Here we see a quiet affirmation of all I have been saying these many weeks in Politics (and it has been fun). Here is a conservative actually stating that things scientific are no more than opinion and cannot be proven wrong (or right). This is the underlying mentality of the right, that all opinions are conjecture and that the science of global warming is nothing more than lay opinion.
Thanks BeenThere, this is why I enjoy reading your posts so very much.
canndo
Well-Known Member
but this isn't the whole of it, there is so much more, the lack of respect, in fact the utter contempt that the GOP holds for the voter, the country and even their own party that they would vet and find this guy acceptable both to run against their nemisis Obama and to actually lead this country through one of the worst times it its domestic history. I don't find Romney nearly as repuslive (and I find him pretty repulsive) as I do the concept that this is what Republicans are willing to foist off on a truely needy citizenry.
Bush, Cheney, Mccain, Palin, Romney - no wonder they look at Reagan as their saint, the others they manage to inflict us with are a reflection of the utter bankruptcy of Republican political thought.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
we should also be allowed to examine mitt's penis to ensure his circumcision was performed correctly, or he should be sent back for a mandatory government authorized "remedial corrective circumcision procedure" (referred to as a "re-circ" in the Bureau of Penis Inspection and Evaluation)
i propose that your penis may also be outside of specification (P-Spec) with regards to foreskin length (BPIE code of regs sec.305.228g) and scrotal separation (BPIE code sec. 15344.164.a)
until you prove your cock and balls are up to spec you cannot continue posting in this thread.