rollinbud
Active Member
Media bias has gone from bad to ridiculous. http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/aug/3/big-bash-86-percent-romney-coverage-negative/
The big bash: 86 percent of Romney coverage negative
- Thread starter rollinbud
- Start date
stickyicky0420
Well-Known Member
lol i wonder why???
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Sympathy for the paulbot yet?
canndo
Well-Known Member
What a joke. Here is a representation of folks who claim firmly to believe that each should be lauded on their accomplishments, they don't believe in affirmative action - except when the one guy does a great job overseas and the other guy fucks it up big time - THEN the media should bend over backwards to give them both their props in order to bolster their self esteme.
The Times could have responded with all of the brilliant things that Romney said and did in Europe and all the bad things Obama did, but they couldn't manage that, all they could do is complain that the media didn't lie enough for Romeny.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
But Fox News a.k.a. "We hate Obama for the wrong reasons" is cool.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Even Fox couldn't come up with 10 minutes of why Romney's visits were just the greatest and bestest things. Of course Limbaugh managed "he hit a home run" but failed to much expound on Romney's rapturous journey.
canndo
Well-Known Member
This is what happens when the right pats itself on the back, raises yet another misspelled protest sign and claims that Obama is SO DAMN BAD that they could run a chimp or a dog against him and win handily. It's not the first time. It comes from the same observations that I have been making, they tend to believe in alternate realities rather than even attempt to change their viewpoint to conform with the truth.
Hell, now they are denying polling figures. Rather than say "gee guys, those numbers look bad, maybe we should do something differently", they say "well, those aren't real numbers, they are from the MSM, they can't be right because we don't want them to be".
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
I don't care much for Romney, but I'll vote for anybody but that idiot in the white house now.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Ive never understood this...."Ill vote for anyone but I don't care for Romney." Well if you will vote for anyone than vote for someone that you like for god sake.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
The Washington Times was founded in 1982 by News World Communications, an international media conglomerate associated with the Unification Church which also owns newspapers in South Korea, Japan, and South America, as well as the news agency United Press International.[SUP][1][/SUP] Bo Hi Pak, the chief aide of church founder and leader Sun Myung Moon, was the founding president and the founding chairman of the board
The political views of The Washington Times are often described as conservative.[SUP][48][/SUP][SUP][49][/SUP][SUP][50][/SUP] The Washington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."[SUP][[/SUP]
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what's the matter? got tired of being called racist after you called him "boy", so you're veiling the racism this time?
get the fuck out of here.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Come Buck cut him some slack
He did change his avatar from the "georgia cracker" one he use to have
remember that avatar
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Who wants to make a bet
Obama pushes for decriminalizing weed in his second term when he doesnt have to worry about reelection?
Obama pushes for decriminalizing weed in his second term when he doesnt have to worry about reelection?
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Ill bet you all of my yields for a year.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
So if you get banned you can just make a new account? Good to know.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
too much for no drama obama. he will end the policy that prevents those caught with simple possession from getting loans for school and whatnot.