How tall should a 4-week old Sativa plant be?
- Thread starter FatJ1114
- Start date
D port Growth
Well-Known Member
1 to 2 foots tall
GrnMan
Well-Known Member
Ugh...maybe a foot tall, but not 2ft??
Picasso345
Well-Known Member
One time I used only moonlight to grow my plants as an experiment and my plant was 2 foots tall at 4 weeks from stretching. 
It depends on strain, your lights, any troubles, etc. From seed I would say a foot at the very most. More important than height though is nodes. How many nodes do you have?
It depends on strain, your lights, any troubles, etc. From seed I would say a foot at the very most. More important than height though is nodes. How many nodes do you have?
GrnMan
Well-Known Member
Yea, he's posting across the forum bro.
Let's help him here..
https://www.rollitup.org/newbie-central/68431-need-help-diagnosing-problem-yellowing.html
Let's help him here..
https://www.rollitup.org/newbie-central/68431-need-help-diagnosing-problem-yellowing.html
Fungus amOnguz
Well-Known Member
and i thought i asked bad questions
email468
Well-Known Member
Sativas generally speaking grow more slowly than Indicas but grow larger in the long run.
Having said that, growth rate is a combination of environment, strain, and experience - not necessarily in that order.
Rather than focus on size, it is much better to focus on other health indicators like color, how they are growing, health of new growth, etc..
Having said that, growth rate is a combination of environment, strain, and experience - not necessarily in that order.
Rather than focus on size, it is much better to focus on other health indicators like color, how they are growing, health of new growth, etc..
email468
Well-Known Member
thanks man - you know your shiza also (that is a good thing, right?)
Picasso345
Well-Known Member
Look on myrollitup. I think it's an option to hide your status.
GrnMan
Well-Known Member
Ahhh, will do.
email468
Well-Known Member
the upper right-hand corner of every post has the post number, a scales and a double exclamation point.
The post number is self-evident, the scales is for giving reputation points (or rep) and the double exclamation is for reporting the post to the mods.
Reputation points are visible below the Gallery link and are represented with the little black (and later red) boxes. The point to rep is to help new to the forum folks know how much weight to give someone's advice. Someone with "a lot" of rep should be more trustworthy than someone who doesn't. Though the system is not perfect since it does not take into account people just repping their friends (which most of us do) and it also does not take into account someone new to the forum but not new to growing who may be giving awesome advice.
Or to put it another way - if you base trustworthy advice on rep points means trusting my advice over a newly joined Jorge Cervantes or Ed Rosenthal!
which would obviously be a very bad decision!
The post number is self-evident, the scales is for giving reputation points (or rep) and the double exclamation is for reporting the post to the mods.
Reputation points are visible below the Gallery link and are represented with the little black (and later red) boxes. The point to rep is to help new to the forum folks know how much weight to give someone's advice. Someone with "a lot" of rep should be more trustworthy than someone who doesn't. Though the system is not perfect since it does not take into account people just repping their friends (which most of us do) and it also does not take into account someone new to the forum but not new to growing who may be giving awesome advice.
Or to put it another way - if you base trustworthy advice on rep points means trusting my advice over a newly joined Jorge Cervantes or Ed Rosenthal!
which would obviously be a very bad decision!
